A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

So, you can't answer my completely reasonable question then?

If you can't answer the question, just admit you have no answer. Don't pull an obvious deflection. You'd garner a bit of respect just by saying you can't answer.

To review my question: Why would they bother "faking" the plane crashes if they used explosives to destroy WTC? Why not just use the explosives and tell people Al-Queda planted explosives?

 

You refuse to deal with the reality that two live footage clips that did not change camera angles before the explosion, do not show a plane. You are stuck in reality but hold tight to your fantasy world on a message board.

 

Okay, I'm glad you cleared that up.

What, pray tell, did they use for T1?

 

It definitely wasn't a plane. A missile is most likely.

 

Quit making stuff up...a missile would have blown the whole side of the building out

 

So you can't answer then?

Why would they bother "faking" the plane crashes if they used explosives to destroy WTC? Why not just use the explosives and tell people Al-Queda planted explosives?

 

Still no answer.....interesting.

 

Ummm...no there aren't.

What makes you think that if someone could add a plane to the footage....someone who just wants to (*)(*)(*)(*) with you could not take it away?

 

I refuse to indulge 7forever; he's here just to pomote his blog. I wanted to say I love your sig line.. I may steal it.

 

The hole that was NOT supposed to be there but has to be there, is not there because no plane impacted T2. Everyone has seen the failure of TV fakery showing the nose come through the northeast side and the live footage showing no such thing. Add to that a picture with no circular hole and now an east view.





The only nose out footage are the close-up side views and in particular the hasty (west view) fade to black admission of fakery. This wide east view does NOT show the nose out mistake because all these graphic planes were separate incidents.

 

Still no answer:

Why would they bother "faking" the plane crashes if they used explosives to destroy WTC? Why not just use the explosives and tell people Al-Queda planted explosives?

 

FAKE PLANE SOUTH VS. UFO WEST WINS

The orb cannot be ignored because the fake west plane was shown on all networks who allowed and participated in TV FAKERY. These pics are 13-14 seconds before a decent sized fireball and show the circular bomb well west of the dive bomber myth. This proves two different flight paths beyond any doubt and that makes the ufo bomb the unanimous winner.




This wide west angle is 11 seconds before impact and travels straight south to north, confirming three flight paths. It has no wings.LOL


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0c00OfgFmk&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=44"]2nd Plane Hit on 9/11/01, Jersey View 1 - YouTube[/ame]
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrwE-U-bkIk&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=12"]2nd hit CBS divebomber CBS9 4:37 pm - YouTube[/ame]

 

You can turn off the spam machine - we get that you ignore the millions of eyewitnesses in favor of your agenda. The question you keep ducking is:

Can you answer this, or will we be treated to more delusional spam?

 

"It's a bomb, it's definitely a bomb." This is the type of footage that would show the orb but we don't get that here. The impact was edited out by someone, that's for sure.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TKdqezML4I&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=45"]9/11 Rooftop Eyewitness - Its A Bomb Definitely A Bomb (Live Raw Video) - YouTube[/ame]

 

Because the planes were supposed to bring down the buildings and the arabs who flew the computer planes got the blame. SHOCK AND AWE. Mind Control, NWO. It happened but the info age uncovered most of the tv fakery.

 

The 'orb' is just an out of focus blob of one of the engines of the plane as he turned into the second tower..

 

If the planes were supposed to bring down the buildings, why did they also use explosives?

How does shock and awe rationalize why they used planes which were completely unnecessary to manufacture the desired outcome, according to you?

So, again: Why would they bother "faking" the plane crashes if they used explosives to destroy WTC? Why not just use the explosives and tell people Al-Queda planted explosives? Or alternately, if the planes were going to bring down the buildings, as you now say, why did they also use explosives?

 

That's only because you're referring to film at a very low resolution from a significant distance away.

By your argument, the Twin Towers had no windows because you can't make them out in the same footage.

 

The "official" BS story refers to a very low resolution "something" from not so far away, and you accept it as proof of Flight 77 (when actually it shows NOTHING of the sort). Why the inconsistent standard?

 

that's because truthers flopped the picture,and made it so out of focus that the engine looked like an 'orb' because of pixellization

 

Who said anything about the official "story"? I'm just pointing out that regardless of what the "orb" in this video footage actually is, the reason it has no identifying features appears to be because of the low resolution of the video. To assume that it isn't a plane, helicopter, missile or alien spaceship because the features of such things aren't clear in that footage would be foolish.

Of course, these videos are far from being the only evidence available.

 

I'm just pointing out that the "orb" in this video footage was the bomb that exploded the south tower and the reason it has no identifying features is because it's an unknown flying object. To assume that it's a plane, helicopter, or normal missile would be foolish.

Of course these videos are far from being the only evidence available that debunks any plane impacting tower 2.

 

It's not out of focus in any way. It's a blob.

 

There are many angles of the fake plane that clearly show it's supposed to be a plane. Your reply is silly and has no substance.

 

Asked and answered. Your question is irrelevant anyway. You're never gonna catch your tail.