A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

This west footage was created later but apparently not so soon after tower 2 exploded.

Here's the obvious plane morph from the east.

 

Bull,NO reporters 'argued'with ANYONE about no plane hitting the WTC,more truther fabrication

 

The live footage trumps the fake footage every time. The two orbs are slightly different in size, come in at different angles, but both from the west. I can't explain the differences but when those orbs are hidden behind the towers, the south tower explodes and in that they are 100% consistent. I'm going with the WB11 footage because of it's similar, straighter path of both wide views.

 

Exactly.....nuff said.

 

I acknowledged a reality that changes nothing. The silly people who pretend to believe the official story never do anything besides ignore facts.

 

If you cannot explain the differences, and you have admitted that you cannot, then that places reasonable doubt on your entire hypothesis. Not that the entire hypothesis isn't already full of more holes than Swiss cheese.

 

So TWO people say there was no plane. Thousands of others say there was. And you believe that the two people are right and all of the other video was faked.

Good luck with that.

 

You know you're right? We should simply rely on something "official". A controlled report perhaps?

 

Don't worry about the slight problems the truth has. You have two flight paths which cannot be reconciled as one. Like with Greer shooting jfk, the 911 goofers will never defend their proven lies and won't present any challenge to facts.

 

I don't need luck when the facts support no planes at either tower 2 or the Pentagon. The two films with those women as witnesses show no plane, which is not possible unless there was really no plane.

 

The radically different angle of approach in two obviously faked videos, presented as evidence, is a slight problem? Please.....

 

So why would these conspirators bother telling people there were planes, or faking planes? Why not simply destroy the towers in whatever method they actually used, and tell people the terrorists used those methods?

Ockham's razor destroys every stupid 9/11 denier argument.

 

It's not a radically different angle.

 

Television fakery sold the world the plane myth and it worked, but the info age quite possibly will take its stand in my lifetime. Because that's the official lie sold to willful ignorants like yourself.

 

Final proof that two flight paths were aired on 911

The government's official flight path is the dive bomber which places the digi-plane above and behind/south of the towers before its steep dissention into the southeast corner of T2. Neither, the chopper 4 orb or WB11's mini-missile ever appear behind and above the towers. The chopper orb is the closest with it first being hidden just below the top of the southwest corner of T1. No plane morph or either orb from the west ever appeared anywhere near as high or south of the towers, in sight like the dive bomber. THIS SIMPLE PART OF THE 911 COVER-UP IS EXPOSED.





[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vknlSBzYkXY&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=42]9/11 FOIA South Tower Strike and Witness "Another Plane Coming Down, See? .... Boom!" - YouTube[/ame]

 

One grainy, doctored video and two confused witnesses do not trump the plethora of other evidence.

 

In this instance, I'm quite comfortable saying yes.

And of course we know which lie was sold to raving lunatics like yourself.

Television fakery. Good Lord. HOW many people would be required for THAT conspiracy to work?

 

thats 4 by my count, here is another one for you. Fox news no less! News you can count on!





Yes a plethora is right.

 

There were around 117 eyewitness accounts and only 20 percent saw a plane. Only 8% saw and heard a plane.

 

Anothe dreamed up Fairy Story. Are your sure the American government didn't use witchcraft?

 

You're not understanding my question (obviously).

Why would they bother "faking" the plane crashes if they used explosives to destroy WTC? Why not just use the explosives and tell people Al-Queda planted explosives?

Like most 9/11 deniers, your preposterous theory requires massive amounts of unneeded complexity that would surely sink any conspiracy. Utterly ridiculous.

 

Okay then, 4, I guess that settles. it.

If no plane impacted T2, what made the big plane shaped hole in the building? Meticulously placed explosives?

 

Since the hole is blown inwards, those explosives need to be on the outside of the building.

 

Why would they bother using real planes when they did not have to? There were no plane crashes and no evidence that can hold to up to even minor scrutiny. For T2 they used a ufo packed with explosives and told americans that Al-Queda planned and executed an impossible hijacking terrorist myth which was sold to the masses by way of five participating TV networks.

Like most 9/11 denialists, your preposterous government conspiracy theory requires a massive level of complexity that would surely sink any mythical conspiracy. Your attempt at truth suppression is Utterly ridiculous.

 

Yes, they were confused and bewildered by not seeing a 767 but an unknown object flying behind the buildings before it exploded Tower 2. You are correct. You can clearly see the orb attached to the bottom of the fake plane.