To some extent it is. Our nation is in debt to it's ass and we're only adding to the deficit with the latest "tax reform bill". It's time to work smarter, not harder. The RW's negative attitude on both abortion and sex education is idiotic. All to often they support a fetus in the womb, don't give a **** about the baby until it turns 18 then seek to blow millions of dollars per year putting them in prison. Better, IMO, to provide sex education in public schools, cheap but effective contraceptives and inexpensive abortions.
As to your first idea, As for your first statements, I'd put it on par with ending innocent lives of the unborn.Murder for convenience is not right either way. As to your second idea.....not bad!
A zygote is not a human being, ergo it isn't murder. At some point it becomes one and, therefore, aborting it is illegal. You are free to be against abortion then flip-flop and complain about thugs, criminals and other low-income criminals plaguing our streets.
Please look up the word potential . You cannot end a life of something that isn’t alive. Try to think of an acorn and an oak tree. It is a potential tree.
Max Rockatansky said: ↑ Translation: I didn't read your posts, I just hate you and anyone who doesn't agree that all men are pigs. No worries, Renee. EXCELLENT AND POINT ON , Renee !!!!!
I'm surprised by that post but here's another thing we could do for that deficit, cut military spending since social programs are a drop in the bucket compared to the waste and corruption in military spending.....but we both know that won't happen.....the Repubs know it's easier to blame the poor...
Are you capable of answering my original question without all of your hysterics about killing those children who are already living?? If not then please do not waste my time and the sites bandwidth because you will not be taken seriously.
Seems like you are the one with hysterics. Somebody referring to an embryo as a child or a zygote as a child seems to be quite hysterical. How can you take someone seriously who does not know the difference
Yet the vast majority of abortions are in blue states, by black mothers and by women who can't afford another child or are not ready for one. Do you really want to add millions of kids to the welfare roles? http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/ The highest number of 2014 abortions occurred in California (157,350), New York (119,940) and Florida (75,990); the fewest occurred in Wyoming (120), South Dakota (550) and North Dakota (1,260) (AGI). Black women were 3.75 times more likely to have an abortion in 2013 than white women (CDC). Reason 19% Done having children 23% Can't afford a baby 25% Not ready for a child
GEE, sure looks like MOST women are responsible and don't have kids they don't want or can't afford.....
If a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it, does it make a sound? Haven't you ever heard of that Pro-Life video “Silent Scream” ? The lungs are probably just too underdeveloped yet, and then the fetus is surrounded and engulfed by all that amniotic fluid. The lungs aren't even designed to take a first breath until it comes out. Even if the fetus tried to scream you wouldn't hear it. One nurse reported hearing a faint whimpering sound when she put her ear right up against an extremely premature baby which didn't survive.
Reason #4 don't know or won't recognize the causes of pregnancy and can't figure out how to prevent it, whether it be birth control or abstinence.
In your total disdain and disrespect for women ( remember what YOU called them!) I expected you to think women are so stupid they don't know the cause of pregnancy. It must be frustrating for some to really realize women are much smarter than they themselves are.
Meaning too stupid to be a good parent? Meaning stupid people tend to have stupid children? What is the solution here?