AMERICAN MOON (2017): A fascinating documentary about the Moan Hoax from start to finish

Thats why the author of the Op is butthurt

 

None of which proves a damn thing.

the fact remains the lanmdings were real not gfaked and that has been proven in this and every other thread.

You are owned

 

Nope.

NASA completely shit their bed in FEAR when GOOGLE announced their Lunar X-Prize in 2007 where companies like Astrobotic Technology Inc. had announced their entry to land a robotic probe on the moon and send live video back of the so called and NASA alleged Apollo moon landing sites

PS:

The only thing you ever owned were all the marbles you lost.

 

What did Australian ham radio operators track?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-04/australias-first-moon-bounce-schocked-us-experts/11339552

Not to mention Parks and Tidbinbilla

https://www.cdscc.nasa.gov/Pages/cdscc_historyapollo.html

 

No they did not. They had good reasons to restrict them as they did and it is not alleghed.

I owned you son and you know it

 

So what!

The FAKED Moon landing had radio communications that even had the CIA telling the Astro’Nots when to speak in order to mimic the 4 second time/distance delay as Bart Sibrel exposed.

By the way my grandfather and my dad were both ham ram radio operators. I was active as a child when they were active in their hobby and know exactly how the 10, 15, 40, 80 and all 50 through the 100 meter amateur frequencies work.

 

I’m sure they did.

 

We TRACKED something

with independent verification from ham radio operators - remember the actual signals from that craft went through Parkes
https://www.parkes.atnf.csiro.au/news_events/apollo11/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkes_Observatory

But the first few moments came from Tidbinbilla https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6267686/canberras-small-steps-behind-the-one-giant-leap/

WE have documentation backing that we got those signals from somewhere on the moon so - did the “fake landing” incorporate a fake rocket that went to the moon and sent signals back?

So for the moon landing to be fake it has to also involve not just the Australian government but TWO radio telescope facilities in Australia as well as ham radio operators and the Carnarvon tracking station

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07...narvon-in-the-apollo-11-moon-landing/11261800

 

They tracked the Apollo rocket which was in LEO only.

They never tracked the ALM on the Moon because it never, ever, ever landed on the lunar surface.

That’s why the CIA had to tell the Astro’nots when to exactly speak. They fake astro’nots even screwed up the FAKED picture/overlay of the earth they put over the one window in the command module to make it look like they were 130 miles away.

The whole thing was so amateurish that only a fool would be stupid enough to believe in that farcical fantasy.

 

Yes they did track it OUT of LEO and all the way to the moon.

They did indeed land on the moon which you and everyone else including your video have failed to challenge.


The only fools are those who believe it was faked.

 

False. Bart Sibrel conned a select gullible few with his video, you included it seems. He made numerous claims that can be demonstrated to be actually impossible. The word "talk" that he claims is false and completely irrelevant anyway. The noise is a comms click from the microphone or some other electronic device, it makes a "tuk" sound.

Sibrel claims through his film that they stood at the back of the cabin and shot through a round window to "mimic the full Earth". In LEO this is completely impossible, as any observer would struggle to get a single country in the window doing this. The window was provably not the round one on the hatch, but a 4-sided one on the hull. Quite clearly the full Earth can be seen to be zoomed out to a very small distant planet and it actually completely disappears off to the side of the window, when we view the full transmission. Needless to say the lying Sibrel doesn't show this bit! The full Earth in the transmission can actually be screen-grabbed at the start and finish and be shown to be rotating a few degrees. It matches fully with photography taken on or around this time. In addition, Sibrel lied about this freely available footage being some sort of secret! There were three transmissions and the dishonest Sibrel deliberately kept footage out of his film because it proved he was lying!

I would suggest (and not expect it to occur) that you stop being sucked in by the fakery from people claiming there were no landings. Sadly, I have yet to come across a single conspiracy theorist who had the integrity to alter their position on one single

 

This is basically a rehash of the usual debunked to death crap. Pick anything in your movie that you think proves anything and I will address it. There is an actual scene in it discussing a falling lid that proves they are in a vacuum!

Capitalizing and an exclamation mark do not prove your case. There are a number of selected pieces of footage discussing hammer sounds that have been exhaustively debunked on this forum. It is totally insane to suggest NASA would have used any live microphones during a scene shot in a vacuum! Notwithstanding that they are not in sync with the hammer impact and many impacts have no sound at all during the same sequence. Vibration and microphone shake noises perhaps, where the only microphone in the scene is a close proximity voice mic anyway!

 

False. The return signal from a surface bounce is random in time and direction and the laser needs to be far stronger. With the laser ranging experiment carried out in numerous countries and numerous sites on the Moon for 50 years, the return is accurate to the millimetre! It has been claimed falsely and with no evidence that these could be unmanned reflectors, but this involves a quite significant space program aside that has no paper trail, evidence and needing many people to carry out. It also precludes the astonishing accuracy needed to place and align the reflector on the Moon.

 

Nonsense. This shows that the TV signal produced passed through a whole variety of channels and conversion to get it ready for transmission. You seem to be unaware that NASA landed 6 times on the Moon, with the last 3 missions sending live footage lasting hours in duration straight to American TV sets. What exactly about that section makes you think it is proof? You do realize that by placing FACTS and SCIENCE in quotes is a way of saying the opposite don't you?

 

Well I will take NASA engineer Kelly Smiths word on it.

"The Van Allen Belts, an area of dangerous radiation." Shielding will be put to the test" "Sensors aboard will record the radiation for scientists to study" "We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space"

lmao!


So critical thought begs the question, If it can't be done today with modern technology what makes anyone believe 1960's tech took men beyond LEO?

Because It NEVER happened, folks and that's a FACT!

And these corrupt moon landing hoaxing thieves continue to steal $56,000,000 a day from the American tax-payers!!!

Also the Lunar Module destroys the moon landing hoax since it was made of gold colored Renyolds Wrap foil, paper and tape, weak aluminum tubes, cloth, cheerleader batons, a Chinese wok, covered with their billion dollar looking gold Mylar.

Looks like most of the crap was bought from a garage sale near Cape Canaveral. *LOL*

The Rover also destroys the fraud since there is no place to put the rover in the Command Module/LEM area of the Saturn V rocket.

It would have to go where the rocket engine for the LEM was claimed to be, so that means they could never leave the moon without that rocket engine!

Another BIG FAIL for the Moon landing believing pseudo science tards.

And since we are on the subject here's yet another piece of very damning evidence from a scientific program of the 60s/70s demonstrating the space suits and how they are put on, bulkiness etc..

Those astro'nots require the help of two people and yet they still struggle to get into the suit because of it's size, design. Bare in mind 3 people had to repeat that feat in a tiny capsule.

It's laughable when you see it and think it through.

But hey on another side note, as if it hasn't been obvious the past three years. Enough people will believe anything they see on their "Tell-a-Vision" screens.

 

itrr happened and thjat is a FACT. Your claim it never happened is a proven lie.



It was never a secret how they dealt with the Van allen belts.

Yes there was space for the rover that is a fact of physics. Physics is a branch of science Science is something which destroys each and every one of your claims.

Putting on a bulky space suioot with help on earth does not compare to doing it in zero Gs.
When you think about it you are desperate and cornered and defated.

Like all lunar landing hoax believers you staked this claim to compensate for a failed life but unfortunately you sare exposed as a massive failure even at this.

 

MOON HOAX: DEBUNKED!: 8.2 If the Van Allen belts weren’t a problem for Apollo, why does NASA need to test the new Orion spacecraft? (moonhoaxdebunked.com)

Read the page, stop running away from debate like a troll and actually learn something. You, a complete internet nobody, with no clue about science in any way shape or form, blunders onto things that a) aren't your own thoughts and b) debunked to death for 20 years. It may not occur to you, but your incompetence in understanding is the real issue. Also your complete failure to respond to direct rebuttal seems to be the same old, same old problem with conspiracy theorists.

Houston we have cherry picking and lying by omission:
"Radiation like this can harm the guidance systems, onboard computers or other electronics on Orion."

Basically the new kit uses smaller integrated circuitry and can be damaged much easier than older more robust, heavier technology. Plus, they are taking more direct routes through the central regions. Learn something!

The troll acronym.

It can be done with today's technology, they need to test it. You are not a critical thinker, you are a parrot of other people's failed observations.

Yes it did, six times and we have 842lbs of peer reviewed material that adds to the evidence. You are a generator of noise with no understanding of a single thing relating to this subject.

Bullshit! The accounts are all published. NASA does virtually none of the spacecraft designs. It is all sub-contracted out to other companies with full accounting and costs available.

Only a very clueless person would make such useless observations. The Lunar Module was built by Grumman, not NASA! There were dozens of engineers, a complex design record, including videos and hundreds of images. Without the lightweight cladding you fail to identify properly, this spacecraft was an engineering masterpiece.

MOON HOAX: DEBUNKED!: 7.17 How could a Lunar Module made of tinfoil withstand temperature extremes so well? (moonhoaxdebunked.com)

Clueless, totally clueless!

Test deployment on Earth:
Apollo 15 testing lunar rover deployment - YouTube

Full deployment on the Moon:
Apollo 15 Rover deployment - YouTube

Once more the ignorance and idiotic observations. In Earth gravity, these things are quite heavy and it makes sense to assist the wearer to put them on. On the Moon it is 1/6 the gravity and weight! In space, weightless, well even you may be able to figure that out!

Especially when it shows flawless gravity, imagery and location. With literally millions of items backing up the full narrative, including 842lbs of peer reviewed lunar samples.

 

You sound very "agitated" and extremely "butt hurt".

It's not my fault that the U.S. FAKED all the Moon landings...

All "chicken shit" NASA had to do was allow the 20 or so GOOGLE Lunar X-Prize contestants like Astrorobotics video tape their FAKED Apollo landing sites to prove all these honorable and trustworthy Moon landing deniers wrong.

But NO!

NASA shit their bed back in 2007 and cried like the "CORRUPT" and "FRAUDULENT little bitches they are in order hide the "TRUTH" that they never, ever, ever, set one human foot on the lunar surface.

So you can keep repeating all the NASA and U.S.government "Propaganda" all you want, but that's all been "DEBUNKED" already going way back to 1972 starting with Bill Kaysing.

I suggest you inform yourself instead of regurgitating debunked NASA propaganda by starting with his detailed and FACTUAL book "We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle" which can be purchased on Amazon in paperback for the measly sum of $44.99 USD.

 

It has never been debunked. The only one butthurt here is you because your every claim has been systematically dissembled.and debunked.

It is proven beyond question that the landings were real and your efforts are a failure

 

Sure it's been "DEBUNKED" over and over again by people who actually have a working brain, not forum poll-parrots who regurgitate proven government lies and have no actual "critical" thinking skills.

I still get a huge kick out of the three "astro'nots" who knew they were nothing but big FRAUDS and dishonest liars and could not bring themselves to swear on the Bible, though....

Just looking at all their sullen faces after their undisputed FAKED moon landing return to earth, where they gave that ridiculous press conference in which they were caught up in all their lies about seeing or not seeing the stars tells me all I need to know.

 

Must have been some solar winds blowing the flag around at the end.

 

Secrets of the Shining - Kubrick told us about the moon landing hoax in this film.

 

No it never has been debunked.

No onje who believes that the landings were a hoax has such a working brain.

There is no proof of such lies as you claim

The frauds and dishonest liars are the ones like the people who make the fictional film

Once again the fact is every claim you have made has been disproven and destroyed. You lose

 

All true.

NASA hired Kubrick to film a fake lunar landing but the cost was so high they had to film on location,