I want to correct a typo in post #216. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...nlight-addendum.584604/page-9#post-1074075848 I meant to say, "You're trying to mislead people who haven't looked at the anomaly."
Nobody cares about your idiotic excuse to spam and ignore responses. You have no integrity, no objectivity - just pathetic.
Incredible isn't it. A person who sickeningly claims to be objective, claims to be a truth seeker has now been shown to be the total obvious. Once again to reiterate: Case 1: This involves the Cernan jump above. This person denies the synchronous landing of the soil with the insane "bouncing/ricocheting" dust and then when shown a picture of the dust rising to zenith with the astronaut's boot denies the 100% visibly obvious! This one sequence alone proves without any doubt at all that the jump can only occur in a very low gravity environment. In addition to the proof outlined above : If you are suspended from a wire it is above you. If you then move forwards, the center of gravity is changed, the wire will pull you back slightly as it presumably attempts to follow you in a magic way to be above you once more. The fact that this basic thing has never occurred to the spammer or that he has no idea whatsoever about it, speaks volumes about how hopeless he is on this subject. In the above footage, Cernan comes back to the LRV from well over 100 yards away and not in a straight line. I don't know what bullshit suspension system the forum spammer thinks is possible and I guarantee he will not address any of this - but for there to be a wire above him following for over a hundred yards and not in a straight line is ridiculous and moronic! Case 2: This involves the John Young jump salute. The footage, once again, shows conclusively a dust arc rising between his boots. Incredibly, this serial forum spammer admitted that he could see this arc "Scott: I can see the arc you're referring to and the soil goes up as high as the foot" (not realizing its significance) then when shown how this was slam-dunk proof, he lied and changed his story! Case 3: This is astonishing. A whole thread on this one concerning the LRV Traverse on the lunar surface shot with film. It is one of the most amazingly detailed pieces of evidence possible and incredibly this serial forum spammer (even though he conceded he had no idea how it was "faked"!) still denied its significance. Still awaiting numerous things: 1. How was this done - without ridiculous trolling about static screen projections! 2. What possible reason would they even do this on 3 different occasions? 3. How many people to do this astonishingly accurate film with zero inconsistencies and proving they were on the Moon. Case 4: This one is both insane and baffling. Noted here. Not one person reading this will not know what happens when you close a door. There is a draft of air and it is mainly in the direction the door swings round. On clear footage replete with dust, this person refuses to answer this totally obvious thing and maintains that a tiny puff of dust in the corner (from impact) is evidence of air, when the damn lid falling sends not a single waft of air towards the visible dust! The air is ALWAYS in the direction of the movement, with lighter spill to the sides. There is no dust disturbance matching the air displacement! He is afraid to answer this simple question: If you slam a door, what is going to happen, a tiny little puff in the corner or a large waft of air in the direction of the door shutting?
You're misrepresenting my position. People can read it here. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...urd-hoax-coffin.604367/page-3#post-1074074552
Liar. Your position is not being misrepresented you are being dishonest as you always are when cornered. Here is your "position" answered directly below it, tell the "viewers" why you didn't point THAT out! Moronic Right there - shoots himself in the foot! Another lie. Irrelevant. Another lie. Irrelevant. You are owned spammer. The 20 years you have posted your garbage on every major forum on the internet have resulted in not one thing standing up to scientific scrutiny. You have been exposed as a liar You say you see the arc, you say it goes as high as his boot! Your problem is you were too ignorant to realize that that was a slam dunk proof they must be on the Moon. There is a parabolic arc of dust between his boots. It travels up to the same height as his boots and at the same time. This is indisputable. It is visible on the original video and on my gif. The astronaut's motion is 100% consistent with lunar gravity. Since the soil and astronaut rise together, they must fall at the same speed together. This means he cannot possibly be on any wire support! If you speed up the jump it starts looking very odd. To make the astronaut and ergo the soil rise the same as Earth gravity, the video must be increased by 245% - this looks totally absurd. There is no counter explanation for this - it must be on the Moon.
Please explain why this is moronic. What's happening can be seen more clearly at full screen and in slow-motion. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...urd-hoax-coffin.604367/page-3#post-1074074552
And the pathetic evasion continues with the customary moronic link to an irrelevant link. You are disgraceful, as is your partner in trolling. Denying something when it is clearly visible shows anyone with eyesight what a liar you are. The arc between Young's boots, the arc in front of Cernan's - 100% undeniable. The falling battery lid that you crazily keep denying - how dumb does anyone have to be to not understand the direction of a draft. It's not impressive, either you are a pathetic liar or life hasn't taught you how drafts operate. You are done spammer - 20 years of failure and you are too scared to admit it.
Bump! Now be an honest truther, be objective, use the scientific method and explain HERE, without links to previous bullshit fail: Why doesn't a falling battery lid send the clearly visible dust everywhere in the direction of fall. Why do you fail to answer the large post at the top of the page - Cernan's dust wave is level with his boot? Game over! What kind of person fails to provide a working answer to the LRV traverse over many miles? How can you stand there and deny evidence, in your face, that Young is rising in line with the kicked dust? How can you maintain this was a small area given the enormous zoom in the Hadley Rille video. We know all of the above prove the Apollo landings individually on their own, so we need to understand what the motive is for this troll to deny these completely obvious things. It's too late for this serial forum spammer to worry about losing face, that ship sailed 20 years ago. Does he have some money making tied in with this massive failure? It can't be to educate others, since every single thing he posts about is conspiracy driven garbage.
