AZ Immigrant Youths CHASE DOWN Senator Kyrsten Sinema – Box Her in Bathroom Stall

Yes, IF it had been a male. Which it WASN'T. So this is a meaningless point-- agree?

And if you can somehow skate over the attack on the Capitol as not being a much more violent, and obvious, attempt to INTIMIDATE lawmakers, than this girl's camera-phone (which I would not come close to intimidation, in my book) then you are way out in fantasy land, about that.

 

You'd be a lot sadder if you were forced to pay for other people's crimes like we are.

 

Can you show me video of Trump supporters following female reps into the bathroom?

 

Please this wasnt 2 gals chatting in the restroom.

It was a confrontation with illegal filming as well.

 

Dont forget this started outside of her classroom and they followed her to the bathroom

 

That is actually debatable, because those legal professionals who have an enormous amount of schooling, and so get paid the big bucks, have trouble expressing a thing, clearly. Here are the conditions, from your link, which the law states are illegal:
<SNIP>
1. In a restroom, bathroom, locker room, bedroom or other location where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy and the person is urinating, defecating, dressing, undressing, nude or involved in sexual intercourse or sexual contact.

2. In a manner that directly or indirectly captures or allows the viewing of the person's genitalia, buttock or female breast, whether clothed or unclothed, that is not otherwise visible to the public.
<End Snip>

Of course, the girl was not filming Senator Sinema, while she was urinating or whatever, or while she was undressed or exposed. She was filming the door to the bathroom stall. That is not the same thing and I'm going to say that, while it may have been in bad taste, I doubt that it was illegal.

 

You have no idea if Sinema was going the bathroom or not and there is no mention of it being ok if a stall door is closed..

 

Yeah, I find the using of camera phones annoying as well, but these are the times we are in. And any politician understands that this job entails a loss of some of their privacy. Sinema is used to being surrounded by a drove of reporters, with real cameras, hounding her with questions, as she tries to make her way through the Capitol; I really don't find it believable that this would shake her up, or register as anything more than a minor annoyance.

 

Not annoying- illegal.

And apparently a male did go into the restroom as well.

 

You should do some reading...

‘Journalists’ Make Things Worse for Biden - and Themselves - After Botched Response to Sinema Incident
https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah...r-botched-response-to-sinema-incident-n451772

 

What I am saying is that, if the door is closed, it doesn't matter what is happening behind it, because SHE is not being filmed.
And didn't you watch the video? Even from the angle of the person who stood back, near the entrance, I am sure I saw a door being closed and/or opened.

 

Uhh this 47 year old woman that introduced Bernie at several rallies hasn't been arrested nor charged?

 

Did Leftists Who Stalked and Filmed Sinema in the Bathroom Commit a Crime?

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/202...sinema-in-the-bathroom-commit-a-crime-n451507

 

You can't give me a thumbnail sketch, to help me decide if it's worth my trouble? The name of the website already has me dubious of its objectivity.

 

And you, apparently, never make clear exactly what you mean, or to what you are referring.

Do you know how to state a coherent argument. Yes, I know, the first commandment, according to Jesus. I was a devout Christian for a long time, and my prior posts should have shown you that I still have a pretty good recollection of the Bible, esp. the New Testament. But there is no reason to delve into into it, other than to distract from my point.

When I said, "the golden rule," that meant what is known by that name, to people, regardless of their faiths: do unto others, as you would have them do unto you. You made a claim about your own motivations, which you presumably expected others to accept (specifically me, to whom it was addressed). Then you made unsubstantiated assumptions about me, which I maintained were false. Instead of showing me the same courtesy of at least nominally accepting my word, you accuse me of lying, and back up your claim with a bunch of lies about posts that I never made, without quotes from any of these fictional posts, of course. One does not need to have an extensive theological discourse, to recognize your hypocrisy. That course only makes sense, to one trying to avoid facing the truth.

 

You only lost me at your last sentence, trying to make any sort of equivocation between these two things. If we are going to ignore the degree of any act, we might as well compare interrupting a speaker, with attacking the Capitol.

One can see far worse than talking at someone in a bathroom stall, all over reality t.v. You should yourself, "Look at Jan-6 when an army of people assaulted the Capitol to confront members of Congress," and then review this video.
A bit ridiculous.

 

It’s more clear than ever that leftists are total hypocrites. If this had been Pelosi or AOC instead of Sinema there would have been gnashing of teeth and anguished howling from NY to LA. And Sinema is even a DEMOCRAT! Imagine the twisted justifications there would be if it had been a Republican woman.

 

And pray, what crimes do you mean?

 

Isn't it a sight to behold?

 

These people are obnoxious in the extreme.

 

What does Jan 6th have to do with the topic? Finning... If the man with the camera followed my wife into a restroom, I would have made January 6th look like time in a monastery! Might have even given that dreamer a swirly! You just stumble all over with your words.....and to think, Sinema is even a Democrat!

 

That female speaks like a child. Pathetic. Talk about dim-witted.

 

It isn't priceless. This is the future of America. Adios!

 

Another confused reply from you. My post was a reply to another's post that specifically made an analogy with Jan. 6th. That's what Jan. 6th has to do with my post, which you would know, if you were paying attention, and read the quote, to which I was replying. But you've already shown-- by attributing to me, a bunch of posts that I never made-- that truth & sincerity have no part in what you write, so I don't expect anything better of you.

 

You've certainly wasted a lot of time to accomplish nothing and failed to make any point.

First, on January 6th, I've made my position clear on this forum many many times that I disapproved of the riot, and think people who have committed crimes should be accountable to the judicial system. However, that doesn't mean I think that January 6th was an insurrection; it was a riot. People who sincerely think that is an insurrection (as opposed to those who are simply saying it as a political point), are just dumb, and too dumb for me to waste much time with. Whether you fall in that category is strictly up to you.

So yes, a senator being harrassed and chased into a bathroom while being filmed is more insurrection-like than the riot on January 6th. No one confronted any congressmen, demanding they change their vote, or follow them into any bathrooms. You may think personal harassment, and people showing up at Sinema's house later, are all just "part of the process" but I regard it as near the bottom, not the top, of a slippery slope.

But in an age when half the country and all the institutions support a General committing treason, I guess this is really a rather minor quibble.