AZ Immigrant Youths CHASE DOWN Senator Kyrsten Sinema – Box Her in Bathroom Stall

Sins of the father?

So, blame the kids for crooked pols and lawbreaking parents?

 

What is dumb, is talking about insurrection, which certainly has nothing at all to do with the girl in this video.

I guess I spoke prematurely-- but your contention is REALLY ridiculous. Bizarre, would be even more on the money.

Only because of all the Capitol Police, many of whom suffered serious injuries in trying to hold back the horde. And if they had reached the Congress, the plan was not to plead their case while recording it on their phone; people had spoken of killing Congresspersons. One person had a pocket full of zip-ties (i.e., impromptu handcuffs). What do you think would have happened?

If you appraise the threat to Sinema, as greater than the threat to Congress on 1/6, when they were evacuated, you show you are not thinking competently about one or both of these events (probably the Capitol riot).

Treason? He was trying to reassure the Chinese, who were erroneously expecting that we might attack them, in order to avoid a conflict, accidentally starting. To call that treason, along with rating that violent throng of people on Jan. 6 as posing less danger than one chica with a camera-phone, shows that you have gone completely off the cliff of reason.

Going by your own rating of what is too stupid to be worth discussing, it seems to me that we are done, here.

 

Some folks on the Left dog whistling for potential domestic terrorist violence against Sinema.

"IT WAS NEVER GOING TO STOP WITH THE LEFT ONLY BULLYING REPUBLICANS:"

● Shot: Feminist on Jezebel: ‘I Will Personally Be Thrilled If [then-Trump aide] Stephen Miller Dies of Covid-19.’

—NewsBusters, May 11th, 2020.

● Chaser:


Time for the Dirtbags at the FBI to investigate.

Kyrsten Sinema’s harassers shouldn’t get a pass from Biden.

They are dog whistling for a felony attack on Sinema

We Asked a Therapist How the Hell Lawmakers Still Traumatized by The Insurrection Are Supposed to Do Their Jobs.

“One of our basic human needs in order to function and in order to perform is feeling safe. It’s a very trying position where she isn’t feeling safe and she feels that there’s a risk she’ll be harmed.”

—Jezebel, January 22nd.

More:


Sinema likely security now before she ends up like the GOP baseball team that was shot up by a Bernie Supporter.

 

Totally, Bro'...
She is gonna need more security that Steve Bartman leaving Wrigley Field after Game 6.

 

After Bidens botched response to her being harassed, I suspect she's more inclined not to support the bill.

 

THis is such a great representation of the left.

Not all of them, but this behavior is absolutely soon to be the status quo of the left with the amount of participation.

 

First off, I saw the video; they didn't chase her out of the bathroom. Secondly, if you are going to serve in public office, you need to have thick skin because things like this and doing other things like booing the president in public or chanting "F*ck Biden" all come with the territory. If she cannot handle it, then it's high time that she consider another career.

 

AOC played it like David Hogg, never in danger, nowhere near the danger, hamming it up like they were a victim.

 

Biden Supports Stalking Women In Bathrooms.

 

He likely always has.

 

And there is something wrong with that? You say it as if I am a fellow clansman, who you just discovered is actually a mestizo. I am decidedly more on the left side of the political spectrum, all in all, than on the right; I never hid that fact.

Here, though, I have no idea what you are talking about. I don't recall ever posting in favor of Rep. Waters; in fact, I thought her immediate call for impeachment of Trump was ridiculous, and I found her language, calling him a S.bag, totally improper, and reflecting poorly on herself.

I also do not think I ever posted on that story. So it is completely erroneous for you to be tying me to these stories, simply because I have many posts which lean left. What you are doing is attributing to everyone on the left, all the worst traits you have seen from, or imagined of, anyone on the left.

Again, I am clueless as to what you are talking about, because you are, obviously clueless about it.

Are you accusing me of shooting someone? Or even of supporting the shooting of anyone? If so, you are way off base. Or to put it a way you might better understand, you are now, yourself, in Maxine Waters territory. Are you proud? And yet don't you see her as shameless?

And this is the only line of your, "reply," that could have anything to do with my post, except you have tied it to a bunch of bogus examples. I had answered a post that alleged forced Democratic conformity, which was a riot, considering the way Congressional Republicans speak, and certainly vote, like either an army of Trump-bots, or a single-minded organism-- a kind of McConnell-amoeba-- depending on the issue. So your citing Democrats like Maxine Waters mouthing off, or presumably "leftist," diners hassling Huckabee-Sanders, or those who were objecting to statues of Civil War "heroes"-- oh! you were complaining on behalf of the, "fine people," who went to Charlottesville, to chant, "Jews will not replace us!" carrying their tiki-torches; I just got that reference-- or your citing the disturbed individual who shot at the Republican softball players, not only do not apply to me but, because none of these is an example of inter-party, forced conformity, they are all non-sequitur to my post.

And I can say that I do have comparisons, of enforced compliance among Republicans, versus among Dems, as I gave in that post of mine that you quoted but apparently did not understand, or else just chose to talk about something else, without explaining your diversion from normal protocol. So now I understand your post; and there was nothing in it for me to need reply to.

 

Maybe. Republicans are expected to obey their leaders and attack the opponents, but it seems Dems are more likely to confront their own leaders too when they don't keep their campaign promises.

 

"I love the smell of Leftist desperation in the morning....it smells like...2010..."

 

When Leftists harass women who won't let Joe have his way they're fair game - it's part of "the process".

If a RWer did that it would be domestic terrorism...

 

I doubt that a republican voter confronting one of his/her own politicians would be considered terrorism. How did you figure that?

Republican voter questioning a republican politician would be labeled a traitor (by the GOP), not a terrorist. Disagreements are not tolerated.

 

I doubt a Republican voter would stalk and corner his/her politician in a bathroom stall and harass them.

Where did I get the idea that Leftists would label their opponents a "threat" in order to silence them?

Read a newspaper in the last few years? How about the last week?

SCHOOL BOARD GROUP LABELS CRT CRITICS AS TERRORISTS; OKLAHOMA LAWMAKERS RESPOND
https://www.ocpathink.org/post/scho...tics-as-terrorists-oklahoma-lawmakers-respond

School board association suggests 'domestic terrorism' threat exists at local meetings
https://fox17.com/news/nation-world...elp-with-domestic-terrorism-at-local-meetings

A Medical Student Questioned Microaggressions. UVA Branded Him a Threat and Banished Him from Campus.
https://reason.com/2021/04/07/microaggressions-uva-student-kieran-bhattacharya-threat/

Where have you been?

I can't help but detect a whiff of disingenuousness in your question.

 

Yes, you hardly ever see a GOP voter confront their own politicians out of fear of being publicly called a traitor. Blind loyalty/obedience is part of their DNA, so they are far more likely to make excuses for their politicians, which is why GOP can hike the debt through the roof and no one says a thing.

Opponents? We are not talking about opponents, we are talking about a democrat voter confronting a dem politician. Why would anyone care if a republican voter did the same to a republican politician? I sure wouldn't care, and I am neither Dem or Repub.

However, as you can see from the comments here, republicans call this dem confronter a "criminal" who should be arrested.

 

Lead chic was 45, and an ardent Bernie Bro. These folks don't care what crimes they commit, chasing a senator into a bathroom and filming is actually a class B felony in AZ. How about we get some arrest warrants and put these women in jail where they belong.

 

She was filmed the entire time up until she shut the stall door... Do you have a reasonable belief in privacy when you are in a stall with the door shut?

 

Exactly. What is the difference between what happened on Jan 6 and the happening to Sinema in the Senate bathroom which is the main topic of this thread?

Why isn't the Senate leader Schumer, for example, commenting on this latest breach of the capitol? Why isn't the Senate leader Schumer, for example, demanding an investigation of the bathroom invasion? Why isn't the Senate leader Schumer, for example, demanding a questioning of the lackadaisical performance of the capitol police? Why haven't the bathroom invaders been arrested?

 

Just stop your doublespeak. It's not worth that many words. You started this string by trying to minimize the actions of the leftist fascists' that stormed into a restroom to manhandle Kristen Sinema for her principles. At the very least, I drew you out and got you to admit what you are!

 

Maybe I missed it somewhere.... Is Sinema crying that she was bullied and that she can't handle it? Seems like she did a great job dropping a deuce, washing her hands and walking out and ignoring the ignorant immigrants.

 

Because the biggest difference is Sinema has a (D) behind her name, even though she might lean center. Piss her off enough, she could change affiliation and sway the balance of power.

 

Yup and apparently one was a male.

 

Yes, she has thick skin. Its funny to see republicans trying to play the victim card on her behalf. Seems like a standard move. If the far-left faction of her party, or the pro-immigration faction in this case don't agree with her, they can speak up . IMO such differences of opinion show there would be interest for a 3rd party in US, where the fringe left can remain Dem, and fringe/populist right can stay with GOP, and moderates and conservatives form a new party. There are differences of opinion within the GOP as well, although their voters might be too afraid to voice them.