Biden Administration's Anti-Catholic Hate Thou shalt have no other gods before ... HHS?

My favorite hobby is not playing golf.

 

When you say "you guys", your kind of exposing yourself as a partisan cheerleader.

But I'll bite.

What is that logic "we" use?

 

Lol, define the word athiest without using the word god.

 

We wouldn't need the word atheist if someone hadn't invented the word god....

 

""Pope Francis considers it an 'incoherence' that President Biden, a ...
'Pope Francis has described it as an "incoherence" that President Joe Biden, a Catholic, is in favor of legal abortion.'"""

But not his priests who support, condone, and supply pedophiles.....Pope forgot to look in the mirror....

 

Gay pride parades are forcing themselves down peoples throats.

 

A person that does not believe in a higher power.

 

Lol, defend your position without shifting the goalposts and relying on silly straw men. Funny how quickly you change your tune.

 

You're still going to be stuck with him not knowing the difference between not believing in a higher power and believing that a higher power doesn't exist. Same misunderstanding as before, just using different wording.

 

No, my position has not changed. No, I did not shift any goal posts. I provided definitions. - a theist believes in god,an athiest believes god don't exist, and an agnostic has no opinion one way or the other about god's existence. These are definitions.

You offer no definitions. All you got is denial.

 

A reimbursement is not a subsidy. Do you not know the difference?

And no idea what a "sangha" is so would have no clue as to how to respond.

 

Judge not lets ye' be judged...Popes tend to forget that one.

Allowing something to happen doesn't make one guilty of what happened. Unless pope Francis wants to take the blame for all those pedophiles...doubt he does. I would say he should worry more about his own house than the White House.

Still wrong. Also, actually saying "fake news" is so 2020.

Are electric sanctuary candles acceptable? | Catholic Answers

Electric Sanctuary Candles | EWTN

As for predicting outcomes of the future, I'll leave that to you. I can't say if they will win in court or not for sure. What I can say is if there are genuine safety concerns, I see no reason why they can't address them if ordered to do so AND still maintain their Catholic-ness.

 

Ridicule is often born out of hate. And the hate is plain in many of your posts about Catholics and Christians. From what I have seen you never pass up a chance to ridicule them. Hence, hate. You can of course deny it. But its evident to anyone with eyes and 2 brain cells to rub together.

 

You might have a point...if Biden ONLY sat there and did nothing in regards to abortion. However, he has advocated for it, that is not simply "allowing" it to happen. That is encouraging it to happen. No different than sitting there advocating that a murderer kill someone. Just because you didn't plunge the knife into someone's chest, does not mean you are not guilty of being an accessory to murder.

 

There aren't. The Catholic Hating Administration Pukes have already backed down from their unjustifiable position.

 

Cool. Sounds like a non-issue then!

 

How has he advocated FOR abortion? Not banning something is NOT the same as advocating for it by ANY stretch of the imagination.

Or rather, to apply your same scenario, if someone advocates for guns to be legal, and someone uses a gun to murder, you're saying they are an accessory to murder? I mean, they allowed the weapon to be legal...

 

Sure it can. I can subsidize something by reimbursing for the costs. The only difference is a subsidy can happen prior to incurring the cost and typically is more a general purpose, such as an industry as a whole as opposed to a specific cost the industry incurs. But they are the same. Someone else is footing the bill, it's that simple.

 

Is signing an executive order enough of an advocating position for you? Or is this one of those instances that a person could provide hundreds of examples and you'll still refuse to admit that he's advocating for abortion?

LINK: Abortion executive order: Biden signs executive order Friday aimed at safeguarding abortion rights | CNN Politics

There is a huge difference between your scenario, and mine. Advocating for guns to be legal, does not mean you advocate for those guns to be used in murder. Where as advocating for abortion is, guess what, advocating for abortion. Your scenario requires assumptions, my scenario is a straight out 1 to 1 ratio.

 

So you don't know what a subsidy vs reimbursement is. Got it. Please learn before continuing.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
FoxHastings said: ↑
OH NOOOOOES....a candle will go out and god will disappear !!!!! LOL The Catholic Church may not make a BILLION next year...to add to their other BILLIONS....to effing bad!





LOL, to you righties EVERYTHING IS HATE.....

Nope, don't hate the catholic Church nor anything else (it's a waste of energy....someday maybe righties will realize that)


Stating facts is not hate, ridicule maybe but not hate...

BTW, do you have any other emotion???

No, it isn't ....ridicule is born out of seeing something rediculous....AGAIN, is hate the ONLY emotion righties know !!!!

As I said, LOL, to you righties EVERYTHING IS HATE.....

 

Look, you're so mad that you can't even quote properly. That is another sign of hate. I feel sorry for you that you have so much hate.

 

I have freedom from government requirements around my participation in religion. I don’t need to be free from seeing a church. I just don’t want the government forcing it upon me in any government space.

That’s freedom from religion.

 

No. He's merely maintaining access to reproductive health care that can include abortion. It also includes contraception and privacy for such care. Again, simply maintaining the legality of a choice is not the same as advocating for it. Unless you agree that maintaining access to guns makes one an advocate for murder. Then I'll concede. Or maintain access to knives for that matter. Or hands.

The difference between my scenario and yours is I know what the actual definition of murder is. Abortion isn't murder no matter what your priest of pastor told you. They aren't lawyers. Murder is a legal term. You can google it. And you're still wrong. Simply because abortion is legal and accessible, with heavy restrictions even before Roe v Wade was struck down, doesn't mean one has to get one. In fact, it could be sitting there legal as hell and never get used, right? Just like that gun could be used for nothing but target shooting. Abortions don't end pregnancies, people do! Stop blaming an inanimate procedure!

 

No, it's as I said.

Subsidy: a sum of money granted by the government or a public body to assist an industry or business so that the price of a commodity or service may remain low or competitive.
Reimbursement: the action of repaying a person who has spent or lost money.

I mean, how you see miles of difference between those two you will need to explain.