BREAKING: US Launches attack on Syria

Even the Russians have an image to uphold, supporting Baby killers won't do much good for that. I bet they are in the process of hand picking a successor to him right now

 

We obviously live with you on different planets.

 

BS, not buying any of it.
There's a ban. Started by Trump himself and cheered by most every single RWer. They're just being hypocrites.

 

I didn't mention war crimes. I mentioned being the world's judge, jury, and executioner. You didn't even address anything in my post you replied to.
There is a world organization to deal with sovereign nation crimes. Hint, it's not the USA.

 

The left doesn't think that. That's why much of the left says get the hell out of the ME. Our meddling in their world is what makes them hate the west.

 

The USA is just getting more and more bold. We used to do covert missions to overthrow gov'ts we didn't like.
Starting in 03, we just declare war or just bomb them from a distance.
We don't even hide it anymore, about killing to take down a gov't we don't like.

 

It's all about preparing the world for the 2nd coming.

 

Gassing kids makes Assad judge, jury, and executioner. Understand I'm all for airstrikes and drones, but NO boots on the ground.

 

If you know they hate us, then why bring them here? If I were a chicken, I wouldn't invite a fox to live in the hen house.

 

Those babies hate us? IMO, they all don't hate us. The RW gets spoon fed that crap and eat it up.
Any rate, I mentioned that in this thread, why do we care if Assad kills muslims? We kill muslims, muslims kill muslims, our RW doesn't want any muslims in the world, so why the need to bomb a country that is doing what it seems we want?
Because it was gas instead of a bullet?
Wer'e hypocrites,

 

It's his country at this time. If he does something the international community finds terrible, the international community needs to act on it. Not this lone wolf crap.

Note: any weakening of Assad is strengthening ISIS. Syria is and has been a no win situation. Especially since our newest buddy Putin is Assad's right hand man.

 

Ivanka wears the pants in the Trump family = http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...Syria-Missile-Strike-Assad-US-Russia-Tomahawk

 

I wasn't talking about babies, but you already knew that.

The RW doesn't get spoon fed anything. If even 1% (It's definitely higher) hate us enough to kill or be killed, that's 15,000,000 Muslims against us. How many are in the US 3 or 4 million? So out of that 30 or 40 thousand here are willing to kill or be killed in the name of Allah? Odds are more successful terrorist attacks will occur. The more we invite the higher the odds.

RW don't want Muslims in the world? How did you come to that conclusion?

I don't want us there in the first place, gas weapons or not.

 

We're working on a plan to kill Kim. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...rea-include-placing-nukes-south-korea-n743571

"The National Security Council has presented President Donald Trump with options to respond to North Korea's nuclear program — including putting American nukes in South Korea or killing dictator Kim Jong-un, multiple top-ranking intelligence and military officials told NBC News."

And they whine about Russia interfering in our elections.

 

Why would they hate us? And don't give me they hate our freedom crap. That's RW BS.

If there are 30-40K haters here, there would be much more terrorism going on.
We don't invite terrorists in. Never have. But I guessing is they are muslim, so they could be. That's how I get the RW don't want muslims in the world. For they think they are just a stones throw away from being a terrorist. Any of them.

 

Trump will have China and Russia bombing us before he's out of office.

 

If Ivanka stays in the White House that might happen very soon.

 

So gassing his fellow Syrians would achieve what exactly?

 

Islam makes no secret they hate Western culture. They see us as immoral and inferior. That's enough to drive a portion of their religion to wage jihad.

There have been many attacks here. Just because most of those attacks have resulted in single digit murders, doesn't mean they're insignificant.

You don't know who we are inviting into our country because we can't vet them without the left coming unhinged and blocking any process that would sniff out potential terrorists.

Again, your claim that RW don't want Muslims in the world is nothing more than hyperbole. We want common sense regulation that limits their access to our country and vets those who are granted access.

 

They hate Usa because you kill them under the squeals of democracy and freedom.
Usa killed 500,000 children in Iraq. And then Usa says it's just a mistake...

 

They also hate the decadence and the excesses of western societies, and up to a point I sympathise with that.

 

His executive order doesn't refer to Muslims or any other religion.

The order is based on security reviews conducted by President Barack Obama’s deputies.

The moratorium is largely temporary. Citizens of the seven countries named as security risks are banned from entering the United States for the next 90 days. Refugee processing is halted for 120 days. The longest-lived aspect of the ban may prove to be the halt on Syrian refugees, but that isn’t given a time frame at all. It will last “until such time as I have determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure that admission of Syrian refugees is consistent with the national interest,” as President Trump wrote.

Obama banned immigration from Iraq, and Carter banned it from Iran, and you didn't say squat.

Trump’s refugee caps are comparable to Obama’s pre-2016 practices:

If you wanted Democrats to make these policies, you shouldn't have run a dreadful insulting washed up drunk, too stupid and vain to give Bernie the number two spot, like the gracious and wonderful Ronaldus Maximus (The Great One) did.

 

Fake News:

The claim that sanctions killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children originated in a 1995 letter to The Lancet which, in turn, was based on a Baghdad survey done by Sarah Zaidi and colleagues. After other researchers identified anomalies in the survey data, Zaidi, to her great credit, re-investigated the work from the ground up. Having sub-contracted the original interviews to the Iraqi government, she traveled to Baghdad and re-interviewed many of the original households. When Zaidi failed to confirm quite a few of the reported deaths in these follow-up interviews, she retracted her results.

 

USA tried to justify yourself, therefore, conducted a fake investigation. Usa lying crap. We see this in Iraq and Libya. And now in Syria.

 

Yes, that's part of it.

Don't think for one second you're any better, comrade.