Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

I never claimed planes didn't hit. That's one of the disinformation specialists here that propagates that agenda.
If you honestly do some very simple research, it takes barely any time at all to find flaws in the "official" BS story. To say that you there is "no proof" of thermite/thermate, or any indications of controlled demolition, is not accutate. Your OPINION is what it is though, and it's wrong.
God is all around you bud. Take the time to look there too and you'll find evidence of that too, if you allow yourself to. People that don't believe in God crack me up too. The thing I say to them first off, is I ask them a question. I say, "Do you see examples of evil, or do you believe there's evidence of evil?" They usually indicate that there is. Then I ask, well, why do you have such a problem accepting that the inverse of evil can exist? Anyway, believe whatever makes you comfortable. I know what the realities are, as do most decent people.

 

The rich never think they're rich. Common mentality.

 

1. The claims of controlled demolition, thermite/thermate have been debunked. Niels Harrit’s (Jones) paper has been soundly refuted as bad science and bad process. Nothing there. Bomb detection/cadaver dogs didn't "hit" on any explosive material in the WTC...and the WTC was not turned to dust. All the steel was accounted for and removed.

2. That's a nice thought however, an appeal from personal incredulity isn't evidence or proof. So far, everything formerly attributed to god has proved to not be so. My guess is, when they do completely solve the Cosmological issue, god won't be found there either.

 

You keep linking to sites that make that claim. Why is that?

 

Yes, you did. As Hannibal pointed out, now you're just running scared from it. If you link to an article, and that article promotes a "no plane" theory, then you endorse that link. You're just too chicken (*)(*)(*)(*) to man up and own it.

At least now you're admitting you're disinfo, that's a step.

There is proof. In fact, Harrit proved it themselves with their stupid little paper. It's over, and not only that, thermite couldn't bring the towers down, so just the theory is bunk

In the smile of every child, in the tears of every baby.

Yeah, real hoots those guys.

Which isn't a relevant question as they aren't denying the presence of evil in the first place. They're saying that there isn't an invisible father figure that condemns you because you touch yourself at night, or have a few beers on the weekend. This is your basic texas sharpshooter fallacy.

No one is denying that there is evil, of course there is also a lot of good in the world too. I could MAYBE see the connection being relevant if you proved there was a "devil". However, I don't think anyone is stupid enough to say that there is no evil in the world. Like previously stated, however, proving there is evil doesn't prove there is a God. How did Greek Mythology, Buddah, et. al. get created if there was a single powerful God? According to the bible God smited the hell out of the followers for building a fake golden cow. Yet, this same all powerful God allows there to be multiple religions, not dedicated to him, without doing a damn thing, nowdays? Seems sketch.

 

Because I link to a source doesn't mean I agree with everything present on said source. I'm trying to illustrate a particular point, which the shills do everything they can to obliterate it.

Get a clue man. To not consider that the "official" BS story is impervious to error, is well, stupid and short sighted.

God exists bro. Because you can't prove to yourself that he does, or because the evidence that exists doesn't align with your standard of acceptance, means nothing really.

It's easier for you to believe that there is no God, so that you can go about your daily business of exploitation, manipulation, or some other form of "business" that helps line your pockets. I understand that mindset. I you truly believed in God, your own conscience would give you pause for what it is that you do to obtain your wealth, and you can't be bothered with that so, to you, there is no God. I completely understand.

 

When you link to a source that ONLY promotes 'no planes, no victims' ... Which part do you agree with? You've done this on several occasions, now.

 

No wrong. You keep claiming the "official" story is BS but when it's pointed out to you, the individual claims made by the Twoofers are factually and scientifically false, you retreat to calling everyone shills.

How about this, why don't you post which specific details/claims the Twoofers make that you believe are supported by the evidence.

Really??? What is your standard of acceptance?

What complete BULSH. I don't acknowledge any god because none of the "evidence" offered as proof has been shown to be valid..yet, I don't run around lying, cheating, raping or killing anyone...and none of the other non-believers I know have acted that way either. So you tell me how you claim or your logic is valid.

Would you start lying, cheating, raping and killing people of you learned there was no god? Is so, you have a character flaw/personality disorder.

 

The "official" story IS BS. Pick any starting point, from the changing timelines NORAD provided (I learned long ago that if a story keeps changing, it means it probably isn't the truth, because, truth is truth, and it doesn't change), or, the underground plane is Pennsylvania, to the magical performance of a failed Cesna pilot. It's ALL BS.
I've tried SPECIFIC evidence is here many times bud. It is never acknowledged so, what's the point in debating dishonesty?

I see examples of God everyday bro. Sorry you're so blind to the truth.

 

Never even once.

 

Just more waffeling on your part. Get SPECIFIC...PICK ONE CLAIM! I bet you won't. Still waiting for you tell us how Thermite was used.

"Blind"??? really?....this is just like you 9/11 claim. You like the idea of the claim, you're just too ignorant to get specific because you know you lack the ability to back it up.

 

Because you know the truth? How do you know what the truth is, and who told you?

 

I'd sooner 'worship' something which exists, rather than a 'god' which is about as realistic a proposition as me finding Cameron Diaz naked on my bed with next week's winning lottery numbers tattooed on her arse.
No wonder you believe in fairy tales like 9/11 conspiracies! It's all falling into place...

 

Believing in mythical deities is inconsistent with logic, reality or common sense. In short it's a waste of time.

 

This is rank nonsense! Evil exists because evil people do evil things; either because they're lunatics, sociopaths, psychopaths or any number of reasons. The converse-people doing good things-is not evidence that 'god' exists!

 

Can the shills get out of "attack mode" or their leader stop running interference long enough to post something that directly opposes the "official" BS story long enough to have an actaul exchange of serious, HONEST debate? I think not. I've tried it. However, if you can come up with a way to actually HAVE an honest exchange without all the static of the shill agenda, I'd be up for entertaining the idea. Thus far, it's not been possible. Reasonable "back and forth" exchanges of points and counter points is NOT what the shills want, at all, as I've found. Lemme know your proposals though. I'm all ears.

- - - Updated - - -

(example of the interference for many years, right here).

 

All you have are excuses. And links to 'no-planes' websites.

 

did you know that its 2013 and nobody cares?

 

Many do not care. Yes, I knew that. People are stupid, ignorant and lazy. What can ya do?

- - - Updated - - -

Hence yet, another example.

 

Believe whatever makes you more comfortable Sir. How's the portfolio? Doing very well, I assume?

 

Why do you KEEP harping on 'building 7 wasn't hit by a plane',Fraud?

WE KNOW what hit it,and we KNOW why it collapsed....

 

Dodge noted.

Planes hit the towers, people were killed. Your impotence to admit this notwithstanding.

 

.........

 

You're a coward. I have asked you, sincerely, to post one specific claim made by you Nutters...something we can research and discuss...ONE CLAIM...and what do you offer up??? Nothing but comments about "shills" and "BS".

The fact is, you have no idea what you're you posting about. If you did, you would have put up a claim.

 

I happen to believe that it's possible for the puddle to be a bit deeper than that. I think the puddle can wonder just what it is that makes a puddle a puddle. Is it its shape? Is it the water it is made of? Is it the strange force that causes a puddle to wonder about its existence? A combination of the three, or something entirely different?

This puddle doesn't just have a self centered view of the world. Its thoughts are more humble. It wonders what will happen when it ceases to be a puddle. Is it once it's no longer the same shape, or when it's made of different water? How is the strange ability to wonder generated in a puddle? Where does the wonder go after the moment the water in the hole changes form or phase or simply wanders off to some other place?