Can I convince PF's resident truthers that American 77 hit the Pentagon?

Discussion in '9/11' started by cjnewson88, Jan 19, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,113
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...said the guy who agreed with leftysergeant's analysis of why smoke looks like smoke in one photo and like the pointed nose of a craft that's too small to be a 757 in another.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/290910-do-you-trust-us-government-11.html#post1062370641

    You can pretend all you want but you destroyed your credibility when you agreed with leftysergeant.

    edit
    ----------------------

    Start watching this at the 37:55 time mark.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwThcdIoufc
    (9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL)
     
  2. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You're the one who called smoke 'metallic', you never had any credibility to begin with. And look, again you're linking the same, same stuff. Already seen it Scott, from the first time you linked it, ya know, 20 times ago Scott. New material much Scott?

    Here's a good repeat; http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/

    Been there Scott? Been proven wrong yet Scott? How about answering my questions, Scott?
     
  3. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have blown it by misquoting me. I never called the smoke normal jet exhaust. It looks like the exhaust from a badly damaged engine or that emitted by an aircraft, from a smoke emitter, in an airshow. Now stop that.
     
  4. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rjmHqES_lto
     
  5. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://911conspiracy.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/molten-steel-extreme-temperatures-at-wtc/







    How many witnesses do you need?

    Or are all these people nuts too?
     
  6. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
  7. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    They were censored by the ZOG media.
     
  8. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I fail to see how molten metal disproves the official collapse explanation.. large, hot fires in the towers bought them down, should stand to be that large, hot fires should continue to burn in the rubble. Which they did. The only thing stories of molten metal do is support the official story, as no controlled demolition has ever, EVER, left behind molten metal and fires in the debris pile.

    Edit: ermahgerd! Controlled demolition!

    [​IMG]
     
  9. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More likely the persons cited did not know how else to describe things they had never seen before.
     
  10. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    A low resolution photo is always going to be a low resolution photo. Go into Best Buy and ask to see a low res photo on one of their high res televisions. You know what happens? You have a low res photo on a big screen. Tell me, if you can, what was the resolution on the original photo? Do you know?

    - - - Updated - - -

    I see the team players are keeping silent on this "new and improved" photo. Wonder why?
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    the only one with no credibility is you scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c

    the plane shown was NOT 'too small',and it's nose was NOT pointed
     
  12. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What "new and improved?" It just hasn't been corrupted by untold numbers of downloads and uploads to and from various web sites. Everybody started from a hastily-made copy that was sent to the news media. Aint gonna look all that professional, nor need it. I could see the plane in the old one, but then I have an above-average IQ and experience in airfield fire fighting.
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,225
    Likes Received:
    1,700
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you always discredit yourself, in fact I would be shocked if there were any official story hugger that did not discredit themselves on a regular basis from my observation.

    I always set cameras to infinity when possible for max depth of field and infocus range.
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Again with the 'discredited' crap.
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,225
    Likes Received:
    1,700
    Trophy Points:
    113

    yeh and you are shoveling us a pile of (*)(*)(*)(*) with clips that make patently false claims.

    there is no barrelling in the lense that ******* is passing off as a 180 degree lense, in fact is is as close to a 50mm on a 35 as one can get.

    - - - Updated - - -

    citation
     
  16. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thank you for showing how little you know about security cameras. It's a fish-eye lens.
     
  17. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    mmm false claims he says, and yet I have an entire blog of evidence to back my 'false' claims up. Where's your supporting evidence?
     
  18. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,113
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lefty sergeant is trying to mislead those viewers who don't take the time to click on the links and look at what he said. Click here and look at posts #91 and #92 and you'll see that he actually said that was normal jet exhaust.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/290910-do-you-trust-us-government-10.html

    When he realized how lame that attempt at obfuscation was, he changed his story and said it was a damaged engine. That was a pretty big slip-up. Now all of the other pro-official version posters here are engaging in damage-control by trying to muddy the waters and bury this issue before too many people see it which totally discredits them too.
     
  19. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,113
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why don't you make a YouTube video and say who you are and which airlines you've worked for and which planes you flew? Some anonymous person saying the opposite of what so many people with backgrounds say is not very impressive.
    http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

    Start watching this at the 37:55 time mark.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwThcdIoufc
    (9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL)
     
  20. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    stand up and gives standing ovation.yeah he never gets tired of his boss sending him here to get his arse handed to him on a platter having to resort to lies to to try and save face in defeat.they sure pay him well to embarrass himself and to tell blatant lies.
     
  21. Shangrila

    Shangrila staff Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    29,114
    Likes Received:
    674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The thread is over 750 posts, feel free to start another.


    Shangrila
    Site Moderator
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page