CDC now saying comorbidity deaths NOT COVID deaths, lol.

Thanks for yet another red herring.

 

YOUR QUOTE: According to the CDC director on CNN, no, not all of them. She failed to provide an accurate count, but did establish that she views COVID deaths differently than liberals did all last year.


QUESTION; Last June, did the Liberals viewed Covid19 Death Rate differently than the Republicans?

Of course!.........Back then, Liberals were chanting; ''We have a high rate of Deaths per 1M pop''

However, Trump and his Sheeple were chanting; ''We have the lowest Covid19 death rate in the world'', or one of the lowest.

Thus, in reference to the DEATH RATE versus DEATHS PER 1M POP, (stupid partisan battle)

Question; Today, who has been ridiculed, Republicans or Democrats?

Answer; Well, the liberals are still right......WE still have a high rate of Covid Death per 1M pop

Question; What about the death rate, is the U.S. still the lowest, or one of the lowest?

Answer;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country

 

If what you say is true and you didnt just pull this claim out of your *ss, can you provide an actual link to someone saying this?

I seem to recall just the opposite where the left refused to say anything about deaths per capita and instead just looked at the total number of deaths (ignoring the bogus China numbers) and called us the worst; when in reality we were always around 10-15 in deaths per capita and doing better than most of the Europe an powers.

 

Your questions are another red herring. The simple point was that the CDC director changed the methodology. Simple fact.

 

Once again, if said 223 cases were classified as Covid19 deaths, then she hasn't changed anything.

Here's how Covid19 deaths are coded in Michigan;

ICD–10 U07.1.............died of Covid19

or

U07.2............. died of other causes, however, Covid19 was an underlying or related cause of death.

https://www.mdch.state.mi.us/osr/Provisional/CvdTable1.asp

Thus, let's assume 100 deaths in Michigan were classified as Covid19 deaths, and as per the following breakdown;

ICD-10 U07.1; 95 died of Covid19

ICD-10 U07.2; 5 deaths; 2 kidney failures, 3 heart attacks, and Covid19 was an underlying or related cause of death

CLAIM; Out of said 100 deaths, 3 died of a heart attack....................TRUE!

 

Once again, the standard has changed, which is the issue. But thanks for repeatedly posting red herrings.

 

On paper, where's your proof that she has changed CDC's Guidelines for Certifying Covid19 Deaths? Where's CDC's News Release?

 

The CDC isn't going to come out here and say "Even though we've been blatantly political over the past year, we're now going to be completely honest and transparent."

So it's up to us to discern and read between the lines. They said one thing, now they want to use a different criteria. It's okay if they don't announce what we're seeing, we're seeing it.

 

It's in the video in the speech I quoted, and again in post #23 I believe for the corollary.

Unless you want to call all the media's frothing at the mouth death tolls (like the kind that CNN scrolled at the bottom of their screen) complete bunk.