Chevron has fallen!

Possibly because I don’t always bother to read your posts

 

Yeah! Amazes me how you will defend the likes of the Koch Brothers

 

Oh! Oh! You poor poor……..shakes head

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8157593/

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/5/603?uid=563b4f0a2a

And I am not even beginning to touch on microplastics

 

Speculation is not science.

 

I'm not aware of any part of this discussion involving the Koch brothers.

 

Thanks for the demonstration that you are unable to recognise peer reviewed research

 

The likes of the Koch bros. They are just an example of those who put personal greed above planetary good

 

Then I can discern no meaning in your post. To what greed do you refer?

 

The words “could” and “may” indicate speculation.

 

And where were they used? And I am asking for specifics please as I acknowledge in both research papers they leave room for further research - this is standard in all research but does not diminish the findings

 

Now this is close to a troll https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/fighting-climate-chaos/climate-deniers/koch-industries/
https://www.newyorker.com/news/dail...ade-their-fortune-and-the-influence-it-bought

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-neg...t-his-climate-change-disinformation-campaign/

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/27/climate-crisis-villains-americas-dirty-dozen

The trouble with relying on denialist websites is that they don’t always give you “the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth”. As you can see I used a variety of sources and there were way more out there

 

Sorry, but you seem to have been duped into believing in made-up boogeymen.

 

Occam’s Razor mate

Either what I posted is incorrect and all these oil execs and the Koch brothers are a above reproach or a plethora of journalists in a multitude of outlets from countries across the globe are somehow wrong and I do realise I am talking to someone who would rather believe a couple of discredited internet blogs over thousands of scientists from diverse countries world wide

 

What you posted included much speculation and dark innuendo but hardly any evidence. Your belief is fundamentally a conspiracy theory.

And what you call discredited internet blogs are in fact excellent aggregators of the peer-reviewed research you claim to follow.

 

Aaaannnndddd all those journalists from reputed outlets across the globe are wrong but you are right? Remember these are “big boys”and they can take the news outlets to court if the facts are in error.

https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/figh...sis/exxons-climate-denial-history-a-timeline/
and wouldn’t they love to bankrupt Greenpeace

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExxonMobil_climate_change_denial

There is documentation alright - tons and tons of it - but you actually have to read what I post to see it

 

More evidence

https://www.nrdc.org/stories/lies-koch-brothers-tell

 

Exxon published and/or shared with the IPCC all their climate research. The reason no lawsuit against Exxon has been successful is that their research was open and their public statements were consistent with IPCC positions.

 

As I said, it’s a conspiracy theory.

 

The NRDC? The same people that just got their lying butts handed to them in the fall of Chevron v. NRDC?

That's just delicious.

 

Thieve reports are not speculation they are reputed sources linking to facts but you aren’t bothering to read them are you? I KNOW this because your answers are too fast to be a considered response. It takes more than 60 seconds to review a link and click on the associated embedded material

 

Expand further please with links and not just speculation. BTW I have provided multiple links from a wide variety of sources

 

The NRDC piece is ten years old. I read it when it was new. It’s a mere propaganda site, btw. A conspiracy theory is right down their alley.

 

Is it? Well I have provided a number of other varied sites

 

No better — sort of a rogues’ gallery of propagandists.

 

Reuters? BBC? The Guardian? They all had much the same information - at this point I am declaring a “Brandolini” as it appears I am doing all the work

Bye!