Climate Alarmist Calls For Burning Down Skeptics’ Homes

Since people don't believe the lies now the hate comes out and they want to destroy all that disagree. Sounds like a third world country dictator


http://www.infowars.com/climate-alarmist-calls-for-burning-down-skeptics-homes/

 

Try his column in context.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevezwick/2012/04/19/a-tennessee-firemans-solution-to-climate-change/

When you folks distort what other people say, how do you expect intelligent people to take you seriously?

 

I think you need to learn to read ... but what do you think of actual death threats by your side against scientists?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/mar/03/michael-mann-climate-change-deniers

 

There is absolutely nothing we can do about Global Warming without destroying the Global Economy and reducing most people to a 3rd world level of existence.

Unitl the Envirowackos realize that, accept that reality and learn to live with it. Then I say send the powder.

 

Then why even say it? Shows the hate the left has foe any that disagree with them

 

So you refuse to address the hate the OP shows

 

Then answer this. If we reduce carbon to say 1950 levels how much will it change the temp and climate change?

 

letting something happen and causing it to happen are two different things.

 

Does nothing for the hate monger speech he put forth that could cause others to do it

 

Would that not just release even more carbon dioxide into the earth's atmosphere? lol

 

if you think that is about hate, you have a comprehension problem.

 

I doubt that a climate scientist could give you an exact answer on that - most likely it would eventually lead to slowing it down.

the thing is, the warming we are seeing now is from several decades ago.

what we will be seeing in 30+ years is the result fo what we are doing now.

 

No I don't. If you think it is not hate you have a problem

 

Another words it is not science just propaganda.

You show what i know Global warming is a scam. If you can not say what it will do then it will do nothing

 

Why does anyone threaten another person

http://www.cleanbiz.asia/story/climate-scientists-threatened-australia

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/20...cientist-wifecyberbullying-pushed-by-deniers/

 

We are still filling in the details but we know, in broad what will happen

 

Environmental terrorism has a long history. The hate continues


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/09/environmental_terrorism_alive.html


http://www.vancouverobserver.com/su...e-canadian-environmentalists-terrorist-threat

http://www.fff.org/comment/com0512c.asp

http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalc...-environmental-terrorist-to-most-wanted-list/

 

Yes we know nature will do what it wants and man has no conntrol

 

American thinker is a right wing blog and it is only one persons opinion - sorry no real evidence there

The piece from the Vancouver observer is more about n the environmentalists and silencing them than about them threatening others

ELF/ALF - hmmmmm interesting that this group has been operating so long with so few arrests over time - interesting also that it appears to be almost uniquely American. Best our Greenies manage is to sit up trees and get elected to Parliament. If I were a conspiracy believing person I would think that the actions of ELF/ALF do more to polarise people against environmentalism that to garner support - and who would benefit from people deriding environmental protections - not big business surely!! That is what I might think were I a believer in conspiracy theories. Not being a believer I do firmly believe that there are nut jobs everywhere who will use any excuse to do harm example the Unabomber.

Whackjobs like ELF aside, and there are extremists everywhere, compare the statement in the original post and in particular how it was actually written, with what Morano is doing in putting people's lives in danger

Which on this comparison is more extreme?

 

You can not dispute the facts so you falsely attack the source.

I would expect nothing less from you when I show proof of what I claim.

 

You claim it but show nothing but blind faith and credulous gullibility wrapped in arrogant presumption.

 

Carbon -- Temperature change
Good God
The man is still living in the nineties .
Back to school pitif2ul9

 

So you can prove how much lower carbon will affect temp if at all

 

So you can live with committing a terminological inexactitude in the thread title? That is straight out dishonesty.

 

No that comes direct from the article in the OP