Even a police officer called in to this program and told the host that they were lied to, and how 911 was a fraud (particularly in WTC7's case), and was told basically to "go elsewhere". This is one of the latest attempts by our own government officials and the powers that control the media to mute any attempts to discuss what actually happened on 911. Read, and think ,and decide for yourself, then please respond. http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-s...onted-about-911-by-wave-of-cspan-callers.html
Read, thought, decided that you post nothing but absolute crap. If you're wondering how I read this so fast? It's because the fact you're linking to it is ridiculous. This is just an appeal to authority (he's a cop (which isn't even verified)) which makes you think it has actual legitimacy. It doesn't.
In reading that article it's so completely off base it's not even funny. First off, that entire article just assumes that it is a fact that building 7 was a CD, which it obviously isn't. The entire thing is confirmation bias at it's best. It doesn't say who the cop is, and it's clear that the people calling in are members of AE911. So basically it's just them tooting their own horn, there's nothing to this at all. Then, finally, they get sick of all the nut cases calling in and asking about 9/11 that they tell them to take it somewhere else. There's nothing sketchy, no politicians are being dodgy, and the article even criticises one politician that says, "I don't have any education in that field, so I shouldn't be speaking about it." (not verbatim, I paraphrased). How stupid is that? Someone says that they don't have the required training to evaluate a demolition, and the article tries to paint them as hiding the truth. That is definitely in the top 5 dumbest article I've read, in regards to 9/11. I like how they try to make it look like the article comes from a legitimate source. Eli Rika is a nobody, just some loser that works for AE911, or a volunteer. No one actually cared about this, and I mean that. Nobody. Good stuff.
I meant someone other than one of the handlers. - - - Updated - - - That's pretty much the standard response from OCTers. I expected no less.
What debate is going to be had when "OCTers" are dealing with "truthers"? It's been proven beyond any doubt that the buildings were brought down by planes, fires, and gravity. You are knowingly lying about what happened on 9/11. If you don't know it by now, then you'll never, never, never, know it. You are then pointless to argue with, and pretty much just around for ridicule. We've gone over every aspect of 9/11 and you refuse to accept facts. You can say there's no chance at honest debate, however, you just don't realize that you're the problem.
Many people don't "know" it. Many people question it, and many people want to mute people that don't agree with them. YOU refuse to accept that facts, unless it's part of the "official" BS story. I'll agree with one thing though. It IS pretty pointless to engage in this kind of "debate", as I've learned over the years.
Especially when you are a 'truther' and bring zero evidence to the debate. When presented with facts, a 'truther' will run away, quite 'fraid.
Says the bully of the block, that prevents honest discussion on the subject, and lies repeatedly about hanging out in airports. Consider the source people, and give it the correct weight when evaluating the programmed posts.
Yes, consider the sources people. A report done by hundreds of professionals in their field that used the most advanced technology available to monitor the collapses of all the buildings, or, subsequently, believe the ramblings of an architect, who has no structural engineering experience, and hasn't designed a building over 30 storeys or even practiced his (*)(*)(*)(*)ing profession in almost a decade. So your options are 1) Believe the unemployed architect (With no experience in structural engineering, fire safety, fire prevention, airplane crashes, and compared the WTC to boxes) that makes his living out of scamming truthers out of their money, or 2) A team of professionals who are educated in the fields they reported on using the most up-to-date technology and recreations. Choose wisely young skywalker.
Excuse me but, "It's been proven beyond any doubt that the buildings were brought down by planes, fires, and gravity." No it has not either. There's been no real investigation of anything Mr. or Mrs. Plague311. You know, you're the real problem and so are other people like you. To me, the fact that Bin Laden's relatives received more respect from our government than the surviving families of 9/11 victims, SPEAKS VOLUMES to me as an American! Flying these people first class out of the U.S. straight to Saudi Arabia when no one else could take to the sky. Furthermore, we had supposedly just been attacked by 19 Saudi citizens and our government red eye's his relatives there. Oh yeah, that's makes perfect sense to me. Those few fires you see burning in WTC7, do you really believe that was enough to collapse a steel framed high rise into it's own foot print when the building wasn't even compromised by the collapse of WTC1 and 2? It doesn't happen that way. It wasn't hit by a plane either. Have some damn common sense! No, no, no, no! Every aspect of 9/11 has not been gone over and you really are a FOOL if you believe that. You say we refuse to accept facts and I say you've accepted facts that haven't been vetted properly. Did you even know that samples of the dust that covered Manhattan were tested by non government people and that Nano-thermites were found in it? Do you know what those are? Hard to keep the "truthers" from getting their hands on some dust to test because it was everywhere. GOOGLE it. Don't ask me for a link either. Take some time and actually LOOK for yourself and maybe you'll find something that will raise your eyebrow a bit. While your at it, take some time to research Poppa Bear Bush and Baby Bear Bush and their tidy little relationship to the Saudi's. Everyone of Baby Bear Bush's oil endeavors tanked and Saudi investment money bailed him out time after time. Do you have enough common sense to ask yourself why? Why would they keep doing that? Why not just flush your money down the crapper, it's a lot faster. Oh No! These things couldn't possibly have anything to do with what happened on 9/11! No way our government is involved in any way. They wouldn't do that! Our government has been concocting schemes like this for the past half century and they finally got one done. The Vietnam war was started over a lie. Google that too. Bay of Pigs, Operation Northwoods, on and on. Our government will do ANYTHING to get what it wants and 9/11 solidifies that statement for me. ANYTHING!
It sure isn't, here's a good listen. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS5EjLAUMU0 Here's another one. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Trj_5J02k&list=PL74C869E0B326F3D7
I'll go ahead and throw you a bone. If you bother to actually LOOK on your own for anything you might be too stupid to find it. Yeah, these unemployed architects and engineers are just crazy. NIST said they found no evidence of explosives in their report yet admit to not testing for them. How convenient. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&list=PL1C909F8C8C80A477
Oh. Okay. When will those unemployed architects do anything with their petition? They've been raising money for years now (700 grand in 2011 alone) on the promise of submitting their 'work'. Got a date for that? Hey ... any demolition experts or structural engineers on that petition? As to your other claims regarding WTC 7: see this. http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html
I think it's pretty difficult to get mainstream media outlets to cover anything news-worthy these days. Who says they are unemployed? You? How do you know how much money they have raised? Why should I care? I believe them over my lame government and your lame accusations that everything has been proven. You can find videos of demolition experts and structural engineers too that sound more credible than your status quo.
That's nice. When will they be submitting that petition? How many structural engineers have signed it?