Conservative Women: Civility and Tolerance in the Age of Obama

You asked for one and I gave one. How many do you need?

Doesn't quite answer the question.

The perceived Jewish role in it. They were no Socialist, that is historical revisionism.

How do you figure?

I have no idea why you have Churchill on that list.

When did I say Social Democrats were conservatives?

And that plan was?

It's not my theory.

http://autocww.colorado.edu/~toldy2/E64ContentFiles/SociologyAndReform/SocialDarwinism.html

You had not orginally specified anything. If you did, then please direct me to the correct post in which you did.

 

More than one because it's not a very good example.

All the names of the Southern Democrats which were "racist social conservatives" supported liberal policies. I'm merely trying to show that you can't call these people social conservatives because there are no indicators which shows that they supported conservative ideals.

Whether it was perceived or made up the Nazis used their hatred for Jews to advance their economic policy.

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the only way to maintain economic security was for Government to seize resources by force and to have direct control over all of them. This is not very capitalist. I don't know why you insist on ignoring this.

I already told you. You said that these groups like the KKK and Nazis were "extreme right" because they "exclusively" supported abortion and eugenics while ignoring that prominent Progressives also supported the same things.

You also want to ignore that they were socialist because you seem to believe that Nazis supported Social Darwinism in an economic sense.

Because he supported eugenics as well before the First World War.

By starting their own church called Protestant Reich Church and assimilate the churches to the culture of National Socialism.

Well I don't know why anyone would come to that distinction. After all, that's not what Laissez-faire is about. It just the believe that market forces should work out themselves. It just means that there should be an economic environment in which people can do business without government regulation and intervention. It's the left that makes the distinction that it means that the poor cannot competition because they're always saying that people are keeping them down.

The link I gave you was suppose to be on civil liberties. I don't know why flag burning was included. I later gave you a revised one.

 

Because you said so?

There are indicators. You are simply ignoring them.

Power for power's sake does not necessarily indicate Socialism. In fact, it fails to explain authoritarian regimes before Socialist theory emerged.

I actually didn't say any of the above. You seem to have connected several statements for some reason when they weren't connected.

Though, as you said, one position does not a liberal make.

Not exactly eliminating the church.

It's based on what people have actually said. Laissez-faire tends to end up with wealth concentrated in the hands of an increasingly dwindling population. Nonetheless, this is really a tangent not totally related to the topic at hand.

When you first brought Robert Byrd up I don't remember you mentioning civil liberties in particular. I didn't specify civil rights and neither did you...at first. The post quoted above was not the first one. And if you didn't want to include something like flag burning, use a source not containing flag burning?

 

Well you might think it's a good example, but it's a pretty broad example as well.

What indicators?

1. They were racist
2. They opposed civil rights

The indicators I look for are core beliefs

He didn't gain power against the county's wishes. The Germans were will aware of the Nazi ideology, literature and their plans for the future. Mein Kampf sold 200,000 copies in German between it's release and 1932

Yes you did >_>

Well I will admit that it is a bad example. I did say the early 1900s. He did believe in eugenics before he was elected as a British MEP and before joining the conservative party in 1922.

They wanted to eliminate Christianity.

Because that's the best source I could get that outlines his positions for as long as he has been in office.

 

Can you quote Obama trashing any conservative woman?

 

No. Why would I look for quotes from Obama?