count unborn fetuses in Census?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by hilbert, Feb 16, 2012.

?

Should fetuses be counted in the Census since humans

  1. yes -count them

    7 vote(s)
    17.1%
  2. no - postpone until birth

    34 vote(s)
    82.9%
  3. undecided

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. hilbert

    hilbert New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Many of you regard unborn fetuses as human beings. Should, therefore, they be counted in the Census?
     
  2. Nonconformist

    Nonconformist New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Great idea! They could add a "-1" age category and better be able to plan for schools, etc.
     
  3. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are not people so shouldn't be counted.

    But a bump because I am interested in the answers of lifers.
     
    HillBilly and (deleted member) like this.
  4. CoolWalker

    CoolWalker New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    3,979
    Likes Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is the dumbest thread I have ever seen. What, you want to count used condoms too? How about handjobs by young boys?
     
  5. Ostap Bender

    Ostap Bender Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2008
    Messages:
    14,957
    Likes Received:
    1,274
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Every Abortion is Killing of a Human Being, please do not forget that Abortions have already killed more as 40 millions Americans.
     
    HillBilly and (deleted member) like this.
  6. itlivesinthere

    itlivesinthere New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "People" and "human" are different terms. No, they aren't people in terms of being an outside-of-the-womb "person", but they are most definitely human beings inside and outside of the womb.
     
  7. fishmatter

    fishmatter New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Such sticklers of Obama's citizenship. But willing to hand it to 40 million who definitely weren't born in the US. This is the generosity of compromised values.
     
  8. CKW

    CKW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    15,393
    Likes Received:
    3,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If fetuses were protected---it would be useful information on the state of the nation.

    The birth rate and births estimated---is important in census data.
     
  9. TheTaoOfBill

    TheTaoOfBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    13,146
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I voted no. But then I realized that was just politics talking. In reality I see no problem with taking data on how many expectant children there will be in the next year.
     
  10. TheChief

    TheChief New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This.

    10characterruleisgaylol
     
  11. PatrickT

    PatrickT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    16,593
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Liberals are sad. I know it's a surprise Hilbert but my mother didn't get counted in the last census. She's dead. She probably voted for President Obama and she was dead then, too, so dead doesn't mean totally gone, does it.

    Just because dead people get to vote for Democrats doesn't mean they get counted in the census.

    The OP was incredibily stupid so I didn't vote in the silly poll.
     
  12. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    perhaps the 3/5ths compromise could be reinstated and amended to replace slaves with fetuses


    The Constitution of the United States

    Article I - The Legislative Branch, Section 2 - The House

    "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons"

    isn't that the point of this thread?
     
  13. mertex

    mertex New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,066
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm pro-choice, but I think most definitely they should be counted, if Reps/cons are going to consider them persons.

    They should also be "deductibles" for tax purposes.

    If you want to consider them as "persons" then they should have every right that a person has. Not sure how this would be carried out, but that is a possible result of such absurd laws.

    Women who have miscarriages should also be investigated for murder, and the fetus should have a funeral, all at the expense of the parents.

    They should be able to vote by proxy (one of the parents can cast their vote).

    I'm sure there are more benefits, but can't think of them at the moment.
     
  14. mertex

    mertex New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,066
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do Republican/conservatives make such outrageous and untrue statements without backing them up? Perhaps the dead people voted for McCain and Palin, I know a lot of brain-dead people that did.
     
  15. Joker

    Joker Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,215
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I wouldn't be against asking on the census if a person within a household is pregnant at the moment.
     
  16. Joker

    Joker Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,215
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think he's referring to live fetuses inside the womb of a pregnant woman.
     
  17. Joker

    Joker Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,215
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sure, but they ought to be counted less than born babies.

    Well, with the exclusion of abortion, they do basically have every right that a person has.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/24/america-pregnant-women-murder-charges

    It's not unheard of, and I think it's definitely warranted sometimes.

    I guess you don't realize how often people do have funerals for their stillborn children, at their own expense.

    No one has the right to vote until 18.
     
  18. fishmatter

    fishmatter New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Although that's a sticky question when many women don't like to admit they're expecting until a good amount of time has passed. But assuming nobody minded at least it would be potentially useful data.

    Asking about abortions, or just adding a column to a page in the census, seems kind of an arbitrary value to include. And if the motivation is the somehow honor their lives (and not flaunt the figure for political gain.)

    Using the common metric that life begins at conception as many as 3/4 of all successful fertilizations spontaneously abort, often before the woman knows she's pregnant. And once you're tested positive as pregnant one in five will miscarry. These deaths, presumably at the hands of god if you believe in such things and you're keeping score, dwarf medical abortions.

    Quickly googling a bit I get just over 4 million live births per year making it about 20 million the number of abortions nobody talks about. Compared to under 1.2 million per year according to the CDC.

    If the goal is to correctly account for all the potential lives then anyone not including these numbers is being dishonest or they're unaware of these facts and aren't qualified to form an informed opinion. And if they know but don't want to dilute the numbers then it's obvious the move is political and not lto honor or remember anyone.
     
  19. Blasphemer

    Blasphemer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    2,404
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Voted yes, it would be interesting. But only third trimester fetuses.
     
  20. PatrickT

    PatrickT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    16,593
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Nice try, Mertex. There isn't a snowball's chance in hell they voted for McCain. There is no Republican equivalent to ACORN. No, the greedy, selfish, racist nitwits who voted for President Obama are desperate to say, "They do it, too," just like little kids.
     
  21. hilbert

    hilbert New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    achievemente says, "This is the dumbest thread I have ever seen"

    I was only treying to point out how ridiculous you GOPpers are, and suceeded with you!
     
  22. hilbert

    hilbert New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know! Citizenship ought to be granted to all CONCIEVED in the U.S. Where they were born wouldn't matter. Imagine Mexican women streamnin g across the border for 1 night stands!
     
  23. Perriquine

    Perriquine On hiatus Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,587
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The only people counted are those who lived in the home on the census date, which is the same date for everyone, not the date the census taker visited the home. Or at least that's how it used to be. I know this from doing genealogical research. Just because someone was born in the census year, that doesn't mean you'll find them listed in the census record for that year. In fact, if the census date was June 1st and someone had a child after that date, the child wasn't counted even if the census taker visited the home after the birth. So when doing research, we have to be conscious of what the census date was and if we know the full birth date, whether it falls after the census date.

    Are we going to start asking on what date the woman got pregnant in order to determine whether or not the unborn child should be counted for that census year? Good luck with that.
     
  24. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,257
    Likes Received:
    74,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    And since 50% of all conceptions do not implant or are naturally aborted in the first weeks - that must mean God kills Americans eh?
     
  25. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,257
    Likes Received:
    74,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Could you imagine the question bank surrounding this?

    Are you female?

    Are you pregnant?

    Are you sure you are not pregnant?

    Have you had a pregnancy test in the last week? If not go to question 52 and use the attached kit
     

Share This Page