COVID-19 Research, Drug trials and Pathophysiology

Let's say we do figure out and prove the virus was created. What then?

 

At minimum, an interesting legal case against the Chinese.

 

I think we should get to the bottom of it if we can.

 

That has been the thrust of my posts.

 

I noticed that some time back.

 

Covid Lab Leak a Scandal of Media & Govt Censorship
Jonathan Turley, NY Post




The Wall Street Journal reports that the Energy Department has concluded that the COVID pandemic most likely arose from a... Read More

 

U.S.
The National Review
Covid-19 Likely Originated with Lab Leak, U.S. Energy Department Finds in New Report

 

Where do we go with the answer, one way or the other?

Having a wet market for game is irresponsible. Maintaining a lab where a deadly virus can escape is irresponsible, too. Deliberately spreading covid would be crazy.

Anyone who is a sentient being knows the CCP are evil thugs we would be crazy to trust.

 

If Chinese culpability can be established to the satisfaction of the courts then extremely significant damages could be awarded. It would be unlikely that the Chinese would ever pay, but the judgment would provide useful leverage.

 

It might be another nail in their credibility coffin. But like I said, sentient beings already know they're thugs so we'd be educating ideologues and stupidos, both difficult tasks.

We might use it to put pressure on CongressCritters to look into our own labs. Are they taking the care necessary to protect society?

 

A question worth asking.

 

Three years of covid and still not a word from the government sock puppet medical experts about what is obviously a genuine concern. Not a word when Trump was President. Not a word since.

We're lucky Ted Kaczynski wasn't a biologist.

 

InteraktiveActive Member
I don't believe there is a coronavirus
it does not exist
do you agree
for the first time, I heard about him on TV
should the TV cure me?
coronavirus was invented to transfer everyone to iphone and ipad

 

coronavirus is a smartphone business at home

 

New genetic data links raccoon dogs to the pandemic’s origin
A sample taken in a Wuhan market in early 2020 holds genetic traces of both the coronavirus and a small canid known as a raccoon dog, scientists report. The data boosts the theory that the pandemic started through natural spillover from animals rather than emerging from a laboratory.
By Joel Achenbach and Mark Johnson

 

If China won’t share Wuhan market covid data, someone else has to
Opinion by Amy Maxmen

 

Not surprised that it is a Zoonotic disease after all MERS and SARS 1 were also Zoonotic. There are a bog load of zoonotic diseases

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/list-of-zoonotic-diseases/list-of-zoonotic-diseases

 

A bit of Chinese cooperation would help immensely.

 

After covid, scientists ask if virus research is worth the threat of a deadly outbreak
Three years after the coronavirus pandemic began, a growing number of scientists are reconsidering the dangers of prospecting for unknown pathogens and conducting other high-stakes work worldwide.
By David Willman and Joby Warrick

 

Oh Really Jack .. Tell us more .. you mean the Gov't and media been lying to us .. misrepresenting the truth ?

 

All except the Chinese are making a good faith effort.

 

Vulnerability in China’s labs allowed pathogens to escape, and it could happen again
Multiple investigations by U.S. and international scientists show China is vulnerable to serious lab accidents.
By Joby Warrick and David Willman

 

• 
  COVID may have escaped lab, top Chinese scientist admits

 

I wouldn't put it past them.

 

Highly cited Lancet long COVID study retracted and republished


One of the first studies of long COVID has been retracted and replaced seven months after editors marked it with an expression of concern citing “data errors.”

The original paper, “6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study,” was published in The Lancet in January 2021. It was “the first large cohort study with 6-months’ follow-up” of people hospitalized with COVID-19, according to an editorial published simultaneously, and has been cited more than 2,000 times, according to Clarivate’s Web of Science. The World Health Organization, for example, cited it in several documents.

Last November, the article received an expression of concern stating that a researcher had contacted the journal about inconsistencies between that study and a paper published in August 2021, also in The Lancet, describing the same cohort of patients after one year of follow up.

Continue reading