Cracker Barrel’s Pride Month Posts Provoke Conservative Fury

Oh, so you're basically justifying tranny terrorism because there are violent white supremacists in our society. I bet that's the same logic you used to defend the BLM riots, too.

 

Gay and transgender means no children.
Without children no society can exist.

 

Yes. And those people have superstitious nonsensical beliefs on that subject that they are incapable of defending.

Slavery is wrong. Homosexuality is not. But I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you are about to argue the opposite.

 

Obviously, you wouldn't ridicule them, therefore you shouldn't ridicule people who don't want alphabet flags in their faces.

 

The only way to make that argument is to be willingly dishonest or to fail to read. Which is it?

Quote me ever defending the BLM riots or ever in any way supporting the initiation of violence. You can't. You are making **** up. It's the only game you know how to play.

 

Some people believe both are wrong. Do they have the right to believe that?

 

Quote yourself ever condemning the BLM riots, or the CHOP zones, or any Leftist terrorists.

 

Yes. People have the right to believe idiotic things. It happens every day.

 

Your inability to use the forum search function is not my responsibility. I've condemned leftist terrorists. Quote yourself condemning white nationalist terrorists.

 

Only 7.2% of the population identifies as LGBTQ+. You better tell the rest of the 92.8% to get busy cranking out babies since 8 billion isn't enough for your ideological bent.

 

Why does it bother you so much? Are you "questioning" yourself?

 

You are claiming that the only options are for EVERYONE to have children or for NO ONE to have children. No one is dumb enough to actually believe that.

 

Are you triggered by a flag?

 

That's two of the most significant acts of terrorism that immediately come to mind and not too distant past.
How come he wasn't a black supremacist sniper?

 

They come to mind to you and you ignore the other attacks because that's what suits your politics. I'm not sure if he was a black supremacists or a black separatist or otherwise a black nationalists (these are all distinctions that righties like to make about white supremacists/separatists/nationalists), but he was certainly a racially-motivated black terrorist. No one denies that.

 

Like I said, CONTEXT.

A flag by itself doesn't trigger me, it's the intent. You're the one that brought up a Confederate flag chair. Under what conceivable scenario would Cracker Barrel, or any other establishment, choose to display a symbol like that? One is used as a show of support, the other a symbol of hate and oppression.

 

Lol, I want to hear you say that, if Biden appeared on stage with a LITERALLY giant Nazi flag in the background, that you wouldn't have a problem with that and wouldn't post about it or post on any thread about it. Go ahead. I want to see you play make-believe.

 

I'm not ignoring a damn thing. It's you liberal progressives that keep telling us that white supremacist terrorism is the biggest threat in the nation.

Was it different on those particular days?

Wasn't it Washington DC and how many people did they kill and have the city in absolute and utter terror for how long until they were caught?

Remember they went around shooting random people from the trunk of a car.

 

No one claimed it was the biggest threat in the nation. People (correctly) said that it is the biggest TERRORIST threat in the nation.

According to you, though, we should completely ignore those shootings. There have been more white nationalist terrorists and you say we should ignore them, so we have to ignore the smaller number of black nationalist terrorists.

 

You are presenting an extreme view.
The real working options are:
1. Do not advertise homosexuality
2. Do not provide special benefits for gay sex.
3. Do not participate in the goup advocating criminal child mutilation.

 

Yes. Your take was extreme and that's why I pointed out how absurd it was.

 

That's hilarious!

 

What do you mean?
There is nothing absurd in stopping advertisement and promotion of gay sex and child mutilation.

 

If it wasn't for fabricated straw man you would have very little to post

 

Your personal problems with gay sex and the fake argument about child mutilation (which tends to only happen in the case of circumcision) mean nothing. Your argument was an all-or-nothing one. Everyone has babies or no one does. That's absurd.