Democratic Party's record on Race >>MOD EDIT<<

You'll have to provide verification of your claims because I watched as much of the Charlie Rose interview that is available on youtube and he said no such thing. All I heard him say is that the government did what it needed to do at the time. Further:

And:

So unless you can substantiate your claim I'm going to have to call

[video=youtube;RvK1F-Thrzk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvK1F-Thrzk[/video]

Granted the current administration is not being nearly liberal enough in going after the bankers. But are you, a conservative, actually calling for Obama to tighten legislation?

 

First google result huh? He disagreed with Obama monetary policy and doesn't like the regations passed in his name. Go quote him on what he thinks about the volcker rule.

Your link only says "they don't know why he resigned" and then speculates. Read your google results before linking.

Here you go:

So he disagrees with your new fed chief too. Not a fan of the stimulus or what they have been doing to banks, not a fan of the rule in his name and got nothing accomplished before he resigned in frustration.

 

My links have Volker DEFENDING Obama and describe Volker as being one of the most LIBERAL people to be found in the Obama admin. And apparently English is a second language for you because your quote does NOT say what you claim it did.

All he is saying there is that the stimulus needs to be ended at the proper time. If that's the strongest argument you have then you have NOTHING! But nonetheless Reagan taking credit for other people's work is not the worst thing he did. It's little wonder THE GOP IS CONSTANTLY LYING about Democrats when their pride and joy of the last FIFTY YEARS, Reagan, had so much REAL CRIMINAL activity in his administration.

 

Ain't it great that democrats finally jumped aboard the republican party platform?

 

Just a shame the Republican Party had to abandon it since the Democrats were doing it..

 

Republicans never abandoned it as has been proven. Democrats had the Presidency, House, and Senate, republicans could do nothing but democrats were forced to face the facts.

It is still democrats that push race based legislation. Not much has changed except moving minorities off of private plantations and onto a government one. Instead of product, they are used for votes.

 

I agree Democrats haven't really done anything but bamboozle black folks for the last 30yrs, but what is the alternative for black folks to join a even more racist party of whom you know hates you.

 

That is the democrat narrative. You have it down pat. A more racist party? Seems you think the democratic party is racist. LOL

 

False. Which party embraces black leadership?

 

LOL, you mean which party ran an empty suit socialist because he was black?

 

Which party contemplated running an empty suit black conservative to "split the black vote"?

 

Sure they did. Reagan vetoed Civil Rights bills and sharply curtailed existing Civil Rights Actions. The Republicans have been on the same path ever since.

That is why minorities have abandoned the Republican Party

 

The American Socialist Party?

 

Yep, because the Republican Party is definitely the party of all people. Only a fool believes that.

 

In spite of page after page of demonstrated decades of racism on the part of democrat party policies, actions and politicians, we continue to see liberals insinuating racism on the part of the republican party without on ounce of evidence to back it up.

 

I don't know of anyone who can point out democrat hypocrisy on race better than Ann Coulter. Here are two recent articles on it:

And here she makes a great point, that white democrats don't actually vote for blacks in their congressional districts, but have segregated districts out so that the black people can vote for black congresspersons while black republicans have to run in majority white republican districts to get elected.

Which party is racist now?

 

That link is now bad but here's a new link to the same article:
http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/3554

 

Yes, and at that time Republicans lived in the North, Democrats lived in the South, now today republicans live in the south and Democrats live in the North, Republicans are now conservative when they used to be liberal, democrats are now liberal when they used to be conservative. Again, for the millionth time, these are absolute historical facts.

 

Here is a entire thread complete with sources about how the KKK were, and still are, CONSERVATIVES not liberals, yes indeed they were Democrats at one time, but they were conservative Democrats. Are you really going to sit here and say the KKK are liberals? Tell someone in the KKK he is a liberal and he will very likely assault you

http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/375935-kkk-liberal-conservative.html

And this here is the KKK charter, its all about how much they hate liberals, not conservatives.

 

Yep, the Klan is stupid, thanks for alerting us to that earthshattering new development. They misuse the term "liberal" ... just like you misuse "liberal" and "conservative." I guess that should lead discerning readers to conclude that you and the KKK are about on the same mental level.

 

Republican record on race is better than democrat’s record on race...even in the last 6 years:

Even if you are a Black President of the United States, you can do anything to undermine Blacks and not be held accountable by the MSM. If this were a republican doing this he would be deemed a racist. But no, this is a Black president who is undermining the educational benefits being received by these inner-city Black children. Isn't it ironic that President Osama can't find one single other government program to cut except this SUCCESSFUL ONE CREATED BY REPUBLICANS! He has to do it because the program is so successful that it is making the teachers union look bad. We all know that Obama owes the teachers unions with all the money that they got from hard working teacher to pay for Obama presidential advertisements. We can't have these inner-city Black children getting great educations and moving out of the poor neighborhoods, that is the democrats main constituents! It serves the democrats purposes to keep them dumbed down and in poverty and in need of democrat welfare programs.

There are more current articles on this showing even democrats who are mad at their party for opposition to this program which I will post at a later date.

 

That's just nonsense. Republicans throughout history have always been a conservative party. We can go through line by line, policies and politicians, with a few exceptions (like Teddy Roosevelt), republicans are and were conservatives.

Was Wilson a conservative? FDR? No.

This is a ridiculous argument and just a silly attempt of democrats to take credit for republican moves.

 

I can't find a link to where you got some of that, except one link to something dated in 1999 (when the Klan had how many members?). The Klan today is nothing. But I think it is safe to say that it is a creation of the democrat party, and that they targeted and lynched blacks and republicans.

I reject the idea that the parties switched philosophies liberal to conservative & visa versa. It's not based in any fact.

 

That would be "abysmal", as in "your post is abysmal". You do realize that anybody who was once a Democrat racist is now a Republican racist, correct? Who gives a (*)(*)(*)(*) about 60-year old 'history'.

 

Well, here is the proof than

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_switching_in_the_United_States#The_19th_century

Following the United States Civil War, the Republican Party faced several massive party switches. As Reconstruction ended, many Southern Republicans became Democrats. In 1872, Republicans dissatisfied with President Ulysses S. Grant formed the Liberal Republican Party and had a joint presidential campaign with the Democrats. Most Liberal Republicans soon returned to the main Republican Party, however. A similar situation occurred in 1884 when the mugwumps left the Republican Party and supported the Democratic presidential candidate, later rejoining the Republican party.
The next major conflict in the Republican Party occurred in 1896 when Republican supporters of free silver left the party to form the Silver Republicans, though again most of these politicians later rejoined the Republican Party. By the late 19th century, as the Democratic and Republican parties became more established, however, party switching became less frequent.
The 20th century[edit]
The shifts in American voter demographics beginning in the second half of the 20th century &#8211; the southern states from Democratic to Republican, and New England and the West Coast states from Republican to Democratic &#8211; have prompted several incumbent federal legislators and many state legislators to switch parties. In addition, as changes in state laws made it harder and harder for members of third parties to be elected or re-elected, many former members of these parties became members of the two dominant parties.[1]
Notable party switchers[edit]
Notable party switchers of the modern era include:"

The link I provided continues to label all of the politicians who switched from democrat to republican and vice versa, the list is so long I cant post it here so you will have to actually go to the wikipedia link and read for yourself.