One gun...one shooter. Some people believe anything, even 50 years later and after the records released reveal a multitude of things that don't align with the one gun, one shooter. Shame that some folks have gotten so used to being so ignorant. My faith in humanity is completely gone at this point. Sad.
Back to the topic that 'Fraud keeps avoiding: Why do you link to 'no-planes' sites and then whine and dodge when called on it?
It is an exact quote of Shyam Sunder NIST WTC Lead Investigator in "Experts Speak Out" [video=youtube;X-V1CiuGMJo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo&feature=relmfu[/video]
I don't find it odd at all. Everything he says is a joke. The entire NIST report is not from an honest scientific inquiry into the building collapse. It is a total cover-up. They are mocking the ignorance of the sheeple with 911 and their blind obedience to authority.
[video=youtube;ERhoNYj9_fg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ERhoNYj9_fg#![/video] Building 7 Obvious Controlled Demolition.
This maybe slightly off topic but, After following the these conspiracy theories for a fair few years now (Brother Jonathan I don't believe your version). All iv'e ever got from your theories is cherry picked quotes, and evidence that fits your own theory, like the nist report you were quoting above about the free fall speed but I don't think you've read the whole thing, because if you had you would know exactly what it says instead of picking out from it what fits your story. Instead you call people who believe the official story shills or whatever else they maybe called, and claim you can't debate with them because of one reason or another. I have one question and that is what is series of events for that day (without truther websites) in your own words.
I don't have a version. I am not promoting any theories. As a 20 year building contractor I agree with the world renowned professional building experts from all around the world, architects, engineers, and building contractors, that the official story is not true. Fire can not bring a 47 story building down in 15 seconds. It's impossible.
But if you don't believe the official report your going to have an opposing account of events so what is it. It's a simple question.
Why do I need to promote a theory when I don't have one? You want me to make one up? Many 9/11 Commissioners don't believe the official story so why should I? [video=youtube;Atju9lOAtn8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atju9lOAtn8[/video]
There is not one 9/11 commission who think 9/11 was done by the US government BJ. Taking random quotes out of context does not mean they do not stand by their work. Many of the same ones in the video have expressed support for their report many times.
I never made the claim that the government did it. The commissioners claim that they got started late, didn't have enough time or money to do a proper investigation. I don't know who did it, but if they don't believe their own report is accurate, then why should anyone? The government spent more money investigating Monica Lewinski than they spent investigating 9/11. What did I take out-of-context?
I did not make that claim. In the video, they clearly doubted they got everything right. In their book they demonstrate that the investigation was hampered at nearly every turn.
Because you use the part of their quote where they are talking about how the government/FAA/NORAD/Pentagon/CIA/FBI were trying desperately to cover their own asses, but cut the bits out where they said they did the job and got the story out.
9-11 was done by 19 hijackers. the towers collapsed due to physical damage, fire, weakened steel, and gravity. thats all there is to it.
That may be true. I heard that somewhere but do not know it for a fact. You are claiming it is false. How much was spent on each investigation?
