Of the People, By the People and For the People. At least try to get your quotes correct as you stoop to mocking things you don't understand.
Hey Jango, we've talked about this before. I know you expected a better military reaction, but understanding the fog of war is very important here. You also have to understand how the military reacts to things. There aren't jets turned on, ready for the pilot to get in and take off. I want to say it takes at least 15 minutes to get a jet able to take off, I'll find a source. Lefty could provide more as well through his military experience. When the first plane hit there was absolutely NO ONE that thought it was a terrorist attack. Every news agency, and government entity was under the impression that it was purely an accident. A plane that meant to land had an emergency and crashed into the tower. It really wasn't until 175 hit that things started coming together. They then new it was a terrorist act, but by the time they got planes in the air it was already almost over. Combine that with the jets going out to sea instead of over Washington, and the fact that the transponders were turned off, and it gets very complicated. I agree that we could have responded better all around. Quicker, more precise, better communication. All that has gone into affect since that day, but I think your expectations are a bit high on this one.
Who's document is it? I simply asked why yours was all scribbled over. Did you ever think to question where the document came from?
I'm still not sure how this is relevant to the discussion. How does this prove that an asset known as Tim Osman is ObL?
Immediately: Stop paying all taxes .............. Default on all loans.......... Stop buying all non necessities............. Stop voting for the 2 party machine........ Democrat and Republican are just a control scheme, thought up, planned,designed by the Plutocrats who truly run this world, to divide and conquer, all within.......... One political voice of the people is the Elite's worst nightmare...........
(from post #26) What you're doing is trying to sway those viewers who haven't seen the proof of an inside job. You know there's a mountain of it. Here's some of it. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDfxB9nUfDc The proof of an inside job is so clear that all you pro-official version posters can do is try to bury it to reduce the number of people who see it and then talk as if it didn't exist. Go ahead and obfuscate away. The proof is simply too clear to obfuscate.
Oh look, Scott decided to chime in for his normal link botting. I was hoping we'd get to see this. "The evidence is so clear." Yep, it sure is. The evidence is clear that 4 planes hit 75% of their targets. Too bad none of your drivel states any different.
Why not Scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c?...you do a good job of obsfuscating truth on these boards FYI,your 'opinion' isn't 'proof'
None of the crap in that Spurstalk link was posted by anybody who knows what they are looking at. The YouTube is just unfounded snark. Cosmored circles the smoke from flight 77 and calls it the nose of the aircraft when there are unmistakeably blue and red lines outside of and directly ahead of the crayon marks. Pathetic.
Here's a discussion on this issue. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/275987-few-debunking-links.html#post1061950663 The pro-official version posters were pretty much cornered on this issue. They then made some hand-waving posts and declared victory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handwaving The Black Knights declare victory even when they lose. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4
That is kind of what you lot do. When we point out that your sources are Nazi, criminals, charlatans or lunatics, you start flinging #2 Sweeney/Martin all over the room.
Does TRUST mean anything? Does anybody really understand what is going on? Take something simple. In World War II there were a number of planes that could do over 400 mph. Could they build planes that could dogfight and do 400 mph without knowing something about aerodynamics? That was 25 years before the Moon landing. So here we are 43 years after the Moon landing. Are we supposed to give a damn about cars that roll along the ground at less then 150 mph? Does that make any technological sense? But do our economists talk about planned obsolescence? Do our economists talk about how many cars we have thrown on the junk heap since the Moon landing? What is there to TRUST? They give Nobel Prizes in Economics to people who can't do algebra. And now they talk about BIG DATA. Isn't the depreciation of durable consumer goods for the last 60 years BIG DATA? What happened to the depreciation of all of those cars since 1969? But didn't all of the new cars get added to GDP? Do our politicians know economists are talking bull(*)(*)(*)(*) or not? I asked a PhD economist to explain how a car engine worked. He didn't have a clue where to start. Are they going to tell us about planned obsolescence in computer software? YEAH RIGHT! It is not about being lied to. It is more like nobody knows what they are talking about anyway but they say it very well. We have out of control complexity. http://vimeo.com/54817244 psik
It won't be 44 years until July 20th. You need to put your brain in gear and not just come up with knee jerk trivia. psik