DOE agrees 9-11 was a Nuclear Event

Discussion in '9/11' started by John T, Jan 22, 2015.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. One Mind

    One Mind Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Messages:
    20,296
    Likes Received:
    7,744
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That works both ways of course...you are not the only group of deniers, we have those in the AGW debate as well.
     
  2. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So let me get this straight. You link a video as proof for what you believe to be true and when proof is confronted, you run with your tail between your legs? Nice to know someone can point out lies and misinformation and you just plug your ears with your fingers and chant "la la la la"...

    :roll:
     
  3. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    :roflol:

    What a cop out!

    Another professional is needed to verify lies Gage is telling? I suppose a professional needs to verify that Gage edited out the east penthouse portion of his video? Or you need a professional to verify that the entire WTC7 structure didn't collapse in 6 to 7 seconds like he lies about?

    :roflol:
     
  4. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,853
    Likes Received:
    2,660
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This is still my favorite video from 9-11.

    [video=youtube;9EXb9LMeizA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EXb9LMeizA[/video]
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,it does NOT 'work both ways'...WE aren't making crap up out of whole cloth to compensate for our incredulity....
     
  6. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
  7. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Not in my experience. What kind of rational mind can entertain controlled demolition?

    This is true in my experience.

    You were saying?

    Yes, but it didn't happen.

    So have most people, and the history of animosity between al-Qaeda and the West seems to be an historical facet that 9/11 truth conveniently ignores. You can find nothing in US history as a precedent for the 9/11 truth mythology. And no, Operation Northwoods and the Gulf of Tonkin are not precedents, as one was a plan that wasn't implemented, with the other more or less a confused fiasco.

    It is fallacious to believe that just because people don't swallow the outrageous claims of 9/11 truth, they automatically 'trust men in power'. Think about it before you parrot such a meme.
     
  8. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    A whole panel against one individual? That's the AE911T way I suppose. They won't even answer my emails about the advertised debate, so clearly Gage doesn't take his challenge all that seriously.

    Lame personal attack.

    Try Chris Mohr's videos on youtube.
     
  9. ararmer1919

    ararmer1919 Banned

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    8,605
    Likes Received:
    2,150
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All the points he made are points you or any other truther could acknowledge, because they show your theory is as full of holes as you claim the official version is.
     
  10. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,604
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Chris Moron versus Retard Gage, that's great!

    If nukes had created openings under the buildings then the videos would have shown the lower portions moving downward. That is not what we see in any videos.

    psik
     
  11. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Ya think? It's as moronic as controlled demolition.
     
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    :roll:

    And the supposed demonstration of physics in your homemade video is not what we see in any of the footage either.
     
  13. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,538
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You proved so many things with the above vid ...

    1. Not a pyroclastic cloud.
    2. No CD explosions.
    3. No freefall of tower.

    I could probably find a few more but the above will do enough to invalidate this thread.

    Thanks for disproving so many truther claims. :)
     
  14. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What amazes me is how that guy survived the 1,100 to 1,300 F temperatures!

    :roll:
     
  15. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,538
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the video is obliviously a fake disseminated by disinformation agents ...
     
  16. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,604
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Richard Gage holds up boxes and expects people to use their imaginations from there. He doesn't actually drop anything. Mohr just says idiotic drivel and gets the quantity of fuel wrong.

    Has someone built a better model that can collapse completely? ANYONE! Any engineering school?

    LOL

    psik
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why would anyone need to?

    No model can approximate the variables present in the collapse of the towers,especially your pitiful attempt..


    BTW just saying Mohr got it wrong isn't enough,you need to prove it.
     
  18. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,604
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    To PROVE they can do something besides just TALK and that what they say is demonstrable.

    You can only TALK. But in 1940 it only took 4 months to model the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in a wind tunnel at the University of Washington. No Computers existed. But today we can't even get virtual models. Physical and Virtual models require accurate data. But that seems to be what people don't want for resolving the 9/11 Affair. The NIST does not even specify the total amount of concrete in the towers.

    And all of the Conspiracy Theorists don't point that out about the NIST.

    People pretending that modelling is unimportant merely advertise that they are full of sh!t.

    I can't help it If you have not listened to Mohr blather, I am not going to waste my time being diverted finding his quotes.

    psik
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tacoma narrows bridge is yet another red herring by you,since they KNEW the mechanism that caused the collapse,it was quite evident.
    And the quantity of concrete in the tower is still irrelevant
    And modeling IS important...just not half assed attempts like YOURS

    And YOU'RE the one that made the claim about mohr,Back it up!
     
  20. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Seconded. It's just the usual truther libel.
     
  21. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,853
    Likes Received:
    2,660
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Some engineers questioned the Tacoma Narrows bridge even before it was built. And the designer of the bridge (who also designed the Golden Gate Bridge) ignored an important 1933 report on the effects of wind deflection in suspension bridges. Interestingly enough, the report was also ignored in the original design of the Golden Gate Bridge. However, during construction it was realized it moved to much and underdeck stiffeners were then added to the design.

    The TN did not have this, although they were being designed to be added at the time of the collapse. One of the alternate designs incorporated plate girders for stiffening, but the expense and delay were not acceptable to the PWA. Most people tend to forget that this was one of the New Deal projects, intended more to put people to work and to be as cheap as possible.
     
  22. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What does your reply have to do with anything I wrote/pointed out? I said that your homemade video doesn't correctly show/represent any of the physics seen on that day either. You went out of your way to avoid discussing this.

    You have admitted that the model in your video in no way represents either twin tower's design. Yet after you admit that, you STILL go on to say that your video represents the physics of the collapse and what SHOULD have happened.

    How is that even possible?

    I even gave you an example using your logic. According to you, I should be able to smash to Hot Wheel semi trucks together and use the results of that collision to predict what will happen physically to real life semi trucks when they collide.

    Is that what you are saying psikeyhackr? Or are you going to continue to ignore these points because you don't want to admit you and your crappy video are wrong?
     
  23. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Psikeyhackr,

    Where are you getting the 425,000 cubic yards of concrete for the two towers from?
     
  24. Casper

    Casper Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    12,540
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Jeeez, the one major downside to the internet is crackpots and nutjobs can spew their nonsense at the world. Why doesn't this board have a Crackpot Conspiracies and Theories Section for this sort of "stuff"?
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,951
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    depending on what point he is trying to make that is perfectly valid, do you know what point he is trying to make?
     

Share This Page