Does Offshore Wind Development Threaten Whales?

On topic: any science to share in this thread?

 

The science was presented. You have merely denied.

 

Already presented.

 

That is a falsehood.

 

9 months in and yet to see one relevant research paper on the topic.

 

You demanded - “Really? Prove your hypothesis“

Nothing can be proven in science.

 

What you have presented is a hodgepodge of unvetted Citizen Science & Fringe Science findings presented in blogs and tabloid rags that have no credentials. This is a statement of fact.

 

Credentialism is the refuge of threatened orthodoxies. It is a barrier to stymie discussion of the question at hand.

 

Denial ^^^ based on belief of a faith based narrative.

The enhanced CO2 effect hypothesis has been disproven using the scientific method. The only way for alarmists to deny this is to claim that the evidence disproving the enhanced CO2 effect hypothesis is not credible.

 

That is not what “prove your hypothesis” means

 

But but but - it fits a worldview bias!

 

Please tell us what you think it DOES mean.

 

Well, no. Please note that the thread title is a question.

 

Professor Koutsoyiannis would not find it ridiculous.

 

Tell you what - I will stop showing what you DON’T know about science if you stop claiming that someone’s opinion is “science”

And WHY do you not know the most basic basic basic of steps in science?

 

Question or no you are defending the core concept like it is the Hope Diamond. But MY issue is the claim of what is and is not science. I am attempting to teach you how to discriminate

 

Your post is unreadable.

 

Then click on the link

 

And btw, I wonder why you fear the question so much?

 

Ah. I see you cleaned it up. I don’t think you’ve made a point.

 

So, nothing about the actual scientific method?

I guess that's to be expected.

 

Hypotheses cannot be proven. Your demand was to do so. You don’t understand the scientific method.

 

Denial pictured. ^^^. Ironically the enhanced CO2 effect hypothesis is apparently what you believe to be true.

 

And finally, I haven’t defended anything except the existence of a question.

 

Lols! Okay I will bite - looking forward to a good laugh

What is YOUR concept of the “scientific method”