Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

If that means the opposite of truthers, then you're right. We look at the evidence instead of ignoring it like truthers do. We don't go off of ignorant opinions like truthers.

So which people? You can't even describe exactly what happened, so it ought to be entertaining to see you try and explain who did it and why.

As usual, that makes no sense.

So you're saying truthers are Internet Bullies? You've just described the majority of truthers to a "T".

 

Can you address the facts or will you continue to act like a bully?

Look at your point numbered 4:

"they like to dominate others and are generally focused on themselves."
Like the way you increase the size of your own posts and reduce the size of everyone else's?

"They often have poor social skills and poor social judgment"
Like the way you ignore evidence posted to you and instead resort to name calling and spamming? (Poor form, EG)

Poor Judy has lost her mind. She can't sell her book legitimately so she resorts to sock puppets who push her falsehoods through bullying tactics. I don't blame her, but you should be ashamed of yourself.

Like the defrocked and disbarred hack lawyer Leaphart.

 

I don't have a 'theory' on any of the above...I KNOW they are a bunch of half truths,assumptions,mistaken beliefs and outright lies......

 

Quit whining,no one is 'bullying' you here

 

EG, why did you quote 2 of my posts in a post in which you did not respond to any of the criticisms of Judy's work that I offered? You asked me direct questions, I answered those direct questions and your response was to call me a bully? You asked me questions and I answered them. That's not being a bully. That's called having a discussion. Are you interested in having a discussion here, or are you just interested in selling Judy's book?

Are you going to discuss your so called facts, or are you only able to cut and paste other people's posts?

My other comment about your posting style was removed as flamebait, but I think it should be noted that each of your arguments has been the work of other people. I've not seen any attempt by you to actually discuss this work. For example, your 43 point post is a word for word cut and paste of someone else's post on this comment thread:

http://thegazette.com/2012/01/29/wtc-buildings’-destruction-unlike-what-we’ve-ever-seen-before/

Can I expect some discussion on this topic from you, or is argument with you moot?

 

Many Internet bullies share some common characteristics. They like to dominate others and are generally focused on themselves. They often have poor social skills and poor social judgment. Sometimes they have no feelings of empathy or caring toward other people.

Can you go a whole post without cutting and pasting someone else's work and inferring it to be your own?

 

1.) I'm not off topic.

2.) I'm not a "Truther"

3.) I'm not a bully.

4.) I'm not whining.

5.) I can cut and paste without your authority.

6.) I don't have to answer to your inflammatory remarks.

 

Light Detection And Ranging optical remote-sensing image of the World Trade Center complex

​

The LIDAR imaging efforts began September 15th as field survey personnel provided the necessary ground support and calibration expertise for the airborne imaging sensors using high resolution cameras and laser ranging devices. The data from these airborne and ground-based systems produced very accurate map products of the World Trade Center complex after destruction from magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions with relative accuracy around 11.8 inches. Both private industry and government agencies such as the U. S. Army Joint Precision Strike Demonstration Program Office benefited from these activities.

The dark green areas in the LIDAR image represent regions below sea level. If there had been a breach in the foundation retaining walls that kept out the Hudson River water, (the "bathtub") these areas would be flooded as well as the New York City subway system. But destruction of two quarter mile high skyscrapers weighing over one million tons didn't breach the protective retaining walls because they were "dustified" in midair. Each World Trade Center tower was 110 stories tall, but the amount of material that remained after destruction from magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions is tiny even compared to the height of World Trade Center 6, which was only an eight-story building. The center of World Trade Center 6 was completely gone, down to the ground. The main part of World Trade Center 4 was completely gone, down to the ground, only the north wing remaining, as if it had been neatly sliced off. World Trade Center 3 was completely gone except for a few stories at the southern end. In actuality, there was no "rubble pile".

Flag-raising photo​

The flag-raising photo was made shortly after 5 p.m on September 11, 2001. He was standing under a pedestrian walkway across the West Side Highway, which connected the World Trade Center to the World Financial Center at the northwest corner. Franklin said the firefighters were about 150 feet away from him and about 20 feet (6 m) off the ground, while the debris was about 90 feet beyond that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_E._Franklin

Language influences perception of events, and thus language can be used for perception management. There was no "rubble pile". A more accurate term would be a "rubble field". Because language influences perception, it may also lead to biased perceptions of events. For an independent evaluation of all the evidence, assumptions must be minimized to avoid such biases. For this reason, a new vocabulary is helpful. The use of new language, such as "dustification", acknowledges that an observed process may not yet be well understood. This alternative terminology enables us to describe an observed process without unduly triggering pre-judgements of the observed events or of their results.

This subject is covered in the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. in Chapter 9, Where Did the Buildings Go?, Section A, pages 175 to 178.

 

1=You skirt the gray area
2-Yes,you are
3-you keep accusing us of 'bullying'
4-Yes,you are
5-Good for you
6-childish

 

You've not answered any of my remarks, let alone the ones you think are inflammatory. It's clear that you're here to regurgitate talking points and sell a book.

I'll keep making sure your potential clients see all the holes in the logic you present. I don't think it'll be good for sales if you refuse to respond.

 

Here's a question about your so called evidence that needs to be answered by you (or Dr Judy Wood):

If steel was rapidly turned to dust in the open atmosphere that day it would have ignited. Iron in the steel would have rapidly combined with the oxygen. This rapid oxidation is called combustion and small particles of iron are highly combustible. The result of this ignition should have been easily recognizable, and could even have been used to determine the composition of the steel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spark_testing

We did not witness these results, however. There was no visible evidence that steel was rapidly turned to dust. What is Dr Judy Wood's explanation for this easily identifiable problem with her conclusion? Does she have one?

 

You keep proving that.

 

You can either keep pestering me with silly questions or you could simply read the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. No one forces you to come to this website. If the subject bothers you so much, turn off your computer and go for a walk.

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."​

 

REMAINS OF STAIRWELL B

​

STAIRWELL B

After the destruction of WTC1, all that remained was a small corner of the outer columns and a few stories of stairwell B. Stairwell B was located in the center of the building. In Figure 172, as noted, Stairwell B can be seen in the remains of WTC1. Another firefighter, Jay Jonas, trapped in stairwell B tells his story:

Firefighter Jay Jonas

And then the collapse stopped.

In a day of first experiences for everybody, well here’s another one. I can’t believe we just survived that. It was very quick and during the collapse you couldn’t help but think that this is it. It’s over. This is how it ends. I kept waiting for that big beam to hit or that big piece of concrete to come down and crush us.

It never came.

When it stopped, my first thought was oh, man, I can’t believe I just survived that. But then we were in a battle with the dust and the smoke for a while. That big cloud of dust that was surrounding lower Manhattan, I was in the middle of that. I know exactly where Ground Zero was. It was the B stairway of the north tower, that’s exactly Ground Zero. That’s the geographic center of that building. And I was in the middle of that.

[...]​

That’s what was going on. And right around the three-hour mark, all of a sudden, a beam of sunshine hit the stairway. I looked and said, “Guys, there used to be 106 floors above us and now I’m seeing sunshine.” They’re like, “What?” I said, “There’s nothing above us. That big building doesn’t exist.”

[...]​

So we left. We left the stairway. Sal left the stairway. He had to kinda go down on the rope a little bit in order to get out because it was elevated and you had to make your way down across some debris. Then Tom Falco leaves the stairway. I wanted to be the last one of our group out of the stairway just because I don’t want to have to go back, “Ah, where’s Tommy? I gotta go back and see where he is.”

Tommy Falco leaves the stairway and then he comes back in. He pokes his head in and he says, “Hey, Cap, wait until you get a load of this.”

So I make my way up to the hole. I poke my head out and I couldn’t believe what I saw. I couldn’t believe it.

The first thing I saw was that corner facade that was still standing. And I was looking at it.
I said, “I can’t believe this. This is unbelievable.”

Firefighter Jay Jonas continues

These are the biggest office buildings in the world and I didn’t see one desk or one chair or one phone, nothing. The only thing you saw was steel, some reinforcing rods and this dust. That’s all that was left. There was nothing that was recognizable, no carpets, nothing like that.

[...]​

Out of all the hundreds and hundreds of firemen, police officers and civilians that were in that building when it collapsed, only 14 of us lived.

We just happened to be in the right spot. There was nothing magic about it. There was one pocket, one void and we happened to be in it.

​

This subject is covered in the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. in Chapter 9, Where Did the Buildings Go?, Section B, pages 181 to 1183.

 

The questions are not simple, and you should be able to answer them with ease if you actually knew the answers or if the answers were in the book. You neither know the answers nor does the book answer the questions.

So, unfortunately for you, you are going to have to endure people questioning the claims you make which are obviously silly and make believe. What else do you call "technology" you can't replicate or even accurately describe?

 

Congratulations on debunking your own (*)(*)(*)(*). How do human beings describe the magic rays nuts like Woods claim "dustified" the building? Surely something that can vaporize a building isn't going to be good for humans, is it? Can you think of ANY other technology that can make buildings go away that wouldn't also make all the other people go away?

Seriously. If you're going to make that claim, why didn't they find all the people after they fell from a building that no longer existed? They should have found tons of bodies lying all over the place.

More questions you will run from since you can't answer them and the answers aren't in your holy bible as written by Saint Woods.

 

Judy Woo's book may be found under "Fantasy Fiction" in the dump bins at Barnes & Noble.

At 2 bucks, it's still overpriced.

 

The only place that would touch that filth is Amazon and only by a truther seller. You can't even get the book from Barnes and Noble because they wouldn't lower themselves to crap like that.

Here is another gem for EG to ignore and run away from. A complete debunking of Judy Woods by a physicist.

 

The question I asked you is a major problem with Judy's theory. The answer to the question I asked is not contained in her so called textbook. On the contrary, It's more of a picture book then a textbook. Wouldn't you agree?

 

As I said before, you can either keep pestering me with silly questions or you could simply read the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. No one forces you to come to this website. If the subject bothers you so much, turn off your computer and go for a walk. The Hosting Provider for this forum is only 2.8 miles from CIA Headquarters!

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

Truth, like love, is not something you can hold in your hands. You can't own it; you can only express and acknowledge it or you can hide it (i.e. hidden truth, secret love). Truth and love are self-evident and knowable. "To thine own self be true; and it must follow, as the night the day, thou can'st not then be false to any man." As free spirits riding our horses through the Carousel of Time, we can choose which horse we wish to mount. Do we want to travel on criticism, contempt, defensiveness, or stonewalling? "No man is an island, entire of itself every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main". Life isn't Dutch Treat. We are groups of time spirits traversing a Universe with no beginning and no end. Those who worship the material world are doomed to a life of misery. "For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?" We are born naked and we die naked. After Adolf Hitler committed suicide, was he able to take his Mercedes with him? Our material nation, like the Titanic, is slowly sinking as the band played on. Who will save us from ourselves as the white, red, black, and pale horses spin around going up and down? Truth, as well as love, finds you; not vice versa. Grab the brass ring by reading the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. and truth will find you.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=000maS8qdps"]Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better[/ame]​

 

OPEN YOUR EYES - IT'S A WHOLE NEW WORLD

NO EVIDENCE OF HIGH HEAT​

Whoever hung those mini-blinds on the top floor did a good job of securing them!
Gee, with raging fires just below the top floor they really good! They must be fireproof!

​

 

Wow! This is a new one! Now the claim is that this web site is sponsored by the CIA because it is only 2.8 miles from CIA! That is TFF!

But, unfortunately for you, I know how to look up IP addresses. Political Forum's IP address is 64.131.68.70 which is in NYC, not Virginia. The registrant is from Kentucky, so you strike out there as well.

Looks like you still can't get anything right.

 

This photo is Six World Trade Center (the U.S. Customs House) which was an eight-story building that stood directly northeast of the the North Tower (WTC 1) as viewed from West Street. The building to the left in the background is the Verizon building across Vesey Street. WTC6 tenants consisted almost entirely of federal government agencies. FEMA, the agency charged with investigating the disaster, did not collect any data on this building. The undamaged mini-blinds on the top floor demonstrate photographic proof that there was NO EVIDENCE OF HIGH HEAT associated with the destruction as substantiated in WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S.,M.S., Ph.D. There were no raging fires. Everything that glows is not hot. Cool flames were accidentally discovered in 1817 by Humphry Davy. Hang mini-blinds over a small campfire and see what happens.

I think it's quite humorous when you hear people squawk about the cost of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S.,M.S., Ph.D. as a basis for not purchasing it. Many people spend more than $39.95 filling their gas tank, dining out, attending a concert or sporting event, and have nothing tangible to show for the expense!

Here are video clips of John Hutchison demonstrating the work of Thomas Townsend Brown (March 18, 1905 – October 22, 1985)* where he points out the 32-gage wire. Professional disinformation agents provocateurs remove the audio and then claim it is levitation by a fishing line. Anyone stating they are fake has essentially identified themselves as a disinformation agent.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qn_hnXvbv8"]TT Brown Experiment #1[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiu7qRZwZnk"]TT Brown Experiment #2[/ame]​

Cool Plasma
For those of you who think that sonic micropulses are the future of tooth care, prepare to set your faces to stun. Scientists at the University of Southern California (USC) have developed a tiny, cool, plasma blowtorch that breaks apart the sticky bonds that holds plaque to a tooth. However, unlike the hot plasma at the center of stars and lightning bolts, this plasma torch is no warmer than room temperature, as demonstrated here by an especially daring dentist.
http://www.popsci.com/gear-amp-gadgets/article/2009-06/miniature-plasma-blowtorch-kills-plague-cleans-teeth

High Frequency Solid State Tesla Coil
http://www.richieburnett.co.uk/hfsstc.html

*an American physicist, was a leader in developing theories concerning the link between electromagnetic and gravitational fields theorized by Dr. Albert Einstein. He advanced from theory to application with the development of solid and disc-shaped apparatuses which are believed to have created and utilized temporary, localized gravitational fields.
http://www.antigravitytechnology.net/thomas_townsend_brown.html

 

What's wrong, EG? Can't respond to the fact you tried to pretend this is a CIA run site because according to you it is hosted by CIA headquarters? Got caught in yet another lie so you run away. Seems to be an ongoing trend among truthers.

 

I suspect that the issue here is that the CIA comment was meant for a different forum. EG rubber stamps his posts all around the internet.