Economy added 255,000 jobs in July

Discussion in 'Economics & Trade' started by toddwv, Aug 5, 2016.

  1. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :roflol: Pew is funded by Soros shills!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Their circulation rate will tell you that.
     
  2. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pew is funded by Soros shills, so what's your point?
     
  3. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    MILLIONS of jobs added under President Obama - HUGE contrast to the millions of job losses under traitor Bush.


    THANK YOU MR OBAMA!
     
  4. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    Funny how when Pew posts numbers favorable to the right wingers, they love it.

    When Pew posts numbers the right wingers don't like, now they claim it is controlled by Soros and that its facts are unreliable.





    :roflol: :roflol: :roflol:
     
  5. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The point is that the Murdoch Street Journal is another RW propaganda outlet along with the other Murdoch "news" outlets.
     
  6. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then I guess Pew is another LW propaganda outlet along with the other Soros "news" outlets. Fair enough.
     
  7. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Funny how when the WSJ posts numbers favorable to the left wingers, they love it. The real problem for the Democrats is the economy has been in a stagnant malaise for the last 8 years with Obama as President, 4 years of Hillary will be the same.
     
  8. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks Obama for the low wage, part time fast food jobs you've created.
     
  9. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When I cite Pew, you can make a point if you wish.

    - - - Updated - - -

    False RW propaganda.

    Thanks GOP for protecting the m/billionaires at the expense of the working people.
     
  10. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male




    MILLIONS of added jobs = "stagnant"



    :roflol: :roflol: :roflol: :roflol: :roflol:
     
  11. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's what the GOP wanted and why they gave us austerity, sequester, and obstruction:

    Step 1: Obstruct and use control of the House to (*)(*)(*)(*) up the economy. E.g. Create as much uncertainty as possible by threatening to cause the US to shut down the government, default on its obligations, and wreck the economy. Add 700,000+ people to the unemployment lines by eliminating government jobs. Block every single proposal by the President to create jobs. Force austerity cuts in Govt spending to prevent or limit economic growth.


    Step 2: Blaaaaame Obaaaaaamaaaaaa and count on tghe sheeple being ignorant and misinformed or simply blaming whoever is president.

    [​IMG]

    The best thing we could do for the economy is vote the billionaire panderers out of Congress.
     
  12. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When Obama took office the economy was tanking at a -9% real rate, losing 700,000+ jobs a month, unemployment was 7.8% skyrocketing upward, and the stock markets and housing markets were crashing in the worst recession in 80 years. The deficit was running at $1.2 trillion, soon projected to hit $1.9 trillion, the housing market was destroyed, and the economy was headed straight for a depression.

    But now the the private sector has added more jobs every month for a record 77 months in a row, stock markets are up about 180% from their recession lows to record highs, corporate profits have hit all time highs, we've gained back all the jobs lost in the recession and millions more, the housing market is recovered, the deficit has been cut by more two thirds, the unemployment rate has fallen from 10% to 4.9%, and 15 million additional private sector jobs have been added since Jan 2010.

    Only those invested in failure for political purposes could say the economy has been in stagnant malaise for the last 8 years. If Obama were a white Republican, conservatives would be hailing him as a savior.
     
  13. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There, there Iremon.............

    [​IMG]

    Look at the stack of regulations for Obama Care.....If you are looking for a reason for Obama/Clinton's stagnant malaise, you're looking at it in the photo above. It's the reason the Democrats lost the House in 2010, the Senate in 2014 and the White House in 2016. Hillary is just Obama in a Pants Suit. The Republican's will fix the economy when the obstructionist Obama is gone from the White House.
     
  14. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]

    Obamanomics......

    [​IMG]

    Reagan inherited much worse.
     
  15. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    GOP obstructionism:

    Maybe we should have done it more like when Reagan was president.


    Not Austerity:

    Reagan
    Federal Spending increase, 1981-1986: +46.0%.
    Total government employment, 1981-1986: +879,000

    Obama
    Federal Spending increase, 2009-2014: -0.53%
    Total government employment, 2009-2014: -540,000

    LOL, RW propaganda. Reagan inherited an economy that was booming with a 7+% real growth rate in which the economy was gaining jobs.

    Obama inherited an economy tanking at a -9% real rate and losing 800,000 jobs a month.

    Only in RW propaganda world could you say Reagan inherited much worse.
     
  16. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Democrats "lost" the WH in 2016? My you are living in the RW propaganda fantasy world, aren't you?

    It's Iriemon with two i's. Thanks.
     
  17. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,675
    Likes Received:
    25,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nearly 100 million American workers have been idled by the current stagnant economy. The economy is very bad for the working class.
     
  18. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure thing Sean. Let's get those grannies out of the old age homes and back in the factories.

    More RW propaganda fabrication the gullible just lap up.
     
  19. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,675
    Likes Received:
    25,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You really do not know that the figure of nearly 100 million workers idled by the bad economy does not include "grannies" in "old age homes"?

    Or are you just feigning ignorance to entertain me. ;-)
     
  20. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just making fun of you and your completely misinformed by RW propaganda beliefs.
     
  21. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,675
    Likes Received:
    25,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well have fun, but the nearly 100 million workers idled by the current sick economy do not include "grannies" in "old age homes". Surely you know that?
     
  22. Taxpayer

    Taxpayer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
    Messages:
    16,728
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    63


    I think this could be true. If you can offer some research showing the composition of those jobs, it would be more compelling. Some research showing the increase in jobs is part time and an associated decrease in full time jobs.



     
  23. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, what is ignored are the many legislative bills brought to the floor like Nancy Pelosi's proposal to give tax break incentives to companies that would bring back jobs to the U.S. and the Republicans blocked that idea. That's why job quality is lacking in this country.
     
  24. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obama Debt

    07/08/2016 - 19,386,088,037,398.99
    09/30/2009 - 11,909,829,003,511.75
    Increase - 7,476,259,033.887.24

    Reagan Debt

    09/29/1989 - 2,857,430,960,187.32
    09/30/1981 - 997,855,000,000.00
    Increase - 1,859,575,960,187

    https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo5.htm
    http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

    Under Reagan the country went into debt 1.8 trillion more by the end of his 2 terms and the economy flourished. They spent a lot more under Obama. We are currently spending even more than under Bush and the economy is at an average of less than 2% growth since Obama was elected. It should be clear that more spending DOES NOT equate to economic growth, it's what the money is spent ON!

    [​IMG]

    Obama 2009 to 2016 less than 2% mean GDP growth.

    [​IMG]

    Reagan 1981 to 1989 4% mean GDP growth. Maybe we should cut spending back to Reagan levels.
     
  25. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let's see our country is exporting companies and jobs and importing workers to take the jobs that are less......That's the Democrats jobs plan?
     

Share This Page