English 101 for anti 2nd amendment advocates and those who don’t think it’s absolute

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by Joe knows, Dec 17, 2022.

  1. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    nuclear weapons are not arms within the meaning of the second amendment for many reasons
     
  2. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If they could get one, sure. If you had a car you could run every red light in your town. Only the car ownership would actually be legal, though.
     
  3. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,988
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Magazines, ammo, etc are also ordnance. No problem then with infringing on ordnance?
     
  4. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,988
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Tell that to the one who used nuclear weapons to rob a bank.
     
  5. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    where do you come up with such an idiotic claim.
     
  6. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,988
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You seem completely ignorant of the term of The 2A, Shall Not Be Infringed.
    Regardless of any argument you want to make to allow infringement.
     
  7. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    another completely inane argument. no one has ever used nuclear weapons to rob a bank/ You might do some studying about what is the natural right upon which the second amendment is based upon. and from that you will learn that nuclear weapons have no use for individual self defense
     
  8. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ah this dishonest garbage again. You support banning all sorts of firearms and pretend that is no different than saying the second does not protect nukes. a completely dishonest argument
     
  9. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,988
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What claim is that?
    About ammo being ordnance? Why do you claim that is idiotic? Do you not know what ordnance is. That seems idiotic, does it not?

    ...
    ordnance
    noun
    ord·nance ˈȯrd-nən(t)s


    1
    a
    : military supplies including weapons, ammunition, combat vehicles, and maintenance tools and equipment

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ordnance
     
  10. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    oh btw you must be talking about incorporation since you silly argument -at the federal level-demonstrates you don't understand the tenth amendment
     
  11. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    you are not using the 18th century meaning. try again
     
  12. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,988
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Again, bring it up to the one who brought it into the thread. I merely responded to it. And asked a question related to that post.
    You might want to actually know what has been posted in the thread before making inane responses.
     
  13. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    well your comment about the tenth and the second demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of constitutional law and constitutional theory
     
    Rucker61 likes this.
  14. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why do you believe that magazines and ammo in common use for lawful purposes are ordnance under the law?
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  15. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,988
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    TOG 6 said:
    Do you believe there is a 2nd Amendment right to use a nuclear weapon to rob a bank?

    Not any argument I'm making.
     
  16. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,988
    Likes Received:
    19,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ordnance
    noun
    ord·nance ˈȯrd-nən(t)s

    1
    a
    : military supplies including weapons, ammunition, combat vehicles, and maintenance tools and equipment
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ordnance

    ...
    Does the law use different definitions than dictionary definitions?
     
  17. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    what do you think the term "arms" means in terms of the second?
    what weapons and accessories are protected against federal interference by the second?
     
  18. Joe knows

    Joe knows Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2021
    Messages:
    13,654
    Likes Received:
    10,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The second amendment mentions common uses?
     
  19. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    20,870
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Rucker (as do I) is well versed in the supreme court case law and this is a key point in Heller
     
  20. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's the question to be asking. Do laws commonly have links to an online dictionary, or do they have a definition created by the law's writers?

    Compare your dictionary definition of "assault weapon" to the definition included in S.736.
     
  21. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Second Amendment neither defines the right nor limits the right protected by the Second Amendment. It limits government power to infringe the right, like the rest of the Bill of Rights.
     
    Joe knows likes this.
  22. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :lol: :lol: :lol:
    OK, Scotsman.
     
  23. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You choose to be wrong.
     
  24. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You choose to be wrong.
     
  25. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The USSC says he's wrong.
     

Share This Page