Evolution is a joke pt V

Nope, neither has the people who believe in evolution. Why do you believe in common descent that there is some sort of magical creature that split into three different beings?!? Not just with us mind you... But, with every living thing on this planet without not one shred of evidence that (as some of you state) takes millions of years that there is not one - not ONE that is having offspring of two completely different species, because this MUST happen in mutation rates and gene dominance.

Also, I always wondered, once a lifeform mutated into a new species (to where it was unable to mate) how did it mate? How was it able to mate? Kinda like the horse and mule... Whichever came first wasn't able to mate, so wouldn't natural selection just kill off that weird mutation?

But, keep having faith that it's real... Keep having faith that simple life created trees and bugs, and flowers and roaches...

 

Perhaps if actually READ the article you would have seen this:

Its demostating what is NOT an adpataion!

 

Tick tock, Im waiting!

 

Christianity is molesting babies and then burning them alive.

Is that untrue?

If you're gonna post bull(*)(*)(*)(*) I'm gonna call bull(*)(*)(*)(*), and this thread is bull(*)(*)(*)(*). If you don't like my commentary on your bull(*)(*)(*)(*), ignore me, or at the very least, don't bother replying just to tell me you disagree; obviously you disagree, you're posting tripe you think means something, and I'm saying it's bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

There's no such thing as a Darwin religion, that's made up bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

The theory of evolution includes nothing about supernatural or spiritual bull(*)(*)(*)(*), so you saying evolution is a religion is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

You've offered no religious alternative in your failed attempts to discredit evolution, all you've thrown up is incorrect bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

Sorry, but if you want this thread to mean something for religion then the minimum that can be expected is that you put forth a religious alternative, which in the 500+ pages of bull(*)(*)(*)(*), you have not done. Not once.

This thread is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

Nah, that's projection. And that's also part of part 1, by the way; from the get go, you've assumed that something doesn't exist for the only reason that you don't get it. Hence, those who say it does exist doesn't get it at all. And so the loop of brain neurons is closed.

See? Still the same. These things don't exist to you for the only reason that you don't get it.

 

Let's recap...

You posted back -

Are you suggesting that the above answered my question? Because this doesn't answer the question I asked about why you think that chimps having 48 Chromosomes and use having 46 means anything...

Does the fruit fly share some of Chromosome 2 with us was another question...

 

I know the difference, because there is one. Next time I suggest you do not post that they are the same, because they are not the same... Like you did below...

Adaptation IS NOT evolution... Do you understand that?

 

Being a white male is killing black teenagers and eating them for dinner.

Is that untrue?

I am pretty sure people are going to read this post above and look at it as one of the most intelligent postings they have ever read on this site!!

Watch!!!!

 

What I get is science and the scientific method. If you are going to call something a theory (thus common descent) you better pass what is required for a fairytale to be even considered science.

Thus, God can not pass the scientific method because it can't be proven... Common Descent... Has that passed the method? Nope, so what is the difference between the people that believe in either?

Nothing...

They have a basic "faith" that each is true...

 

CAN'T...

KEEP MY...

EYES...

OFF OF...

THREAD...




MUST...




POST...

 

No... Incorrect... It was just another feathered dinosaurs as I stated before. You just believed and had "FAITH" that they were telling the truth... You had "FAITH" that this was a flying bird and it wasn't...

Your religion did you wrong, but, just like Mormons (like slavery and all the other ridiculous things they've changed), it will change with the times and create a "new" theory!

No... Probably not... Like I stated before - what that was before is what it is now... http://australian-animals.net/emu.htm or http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/birds/ostrich/ or ... Well... take you pick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flightless_bird

 

You're doing the very thing he predicted you would do. Do you realize that? You're getting angry and defensive as if someone were attacking your religion.

 

You can view it that way, or you can view it the way I do: people vomiting up incorrect bull(*)(*)(*)(*) (purportedly on purpose) is (*)(*)(*)(*)ing annoying. He could be talking about math for all I care, if he's going to pretend math is a religion and say that it's only a hypothesis, it's (*)(*)(*)(*)ing annoying and I'm not gonna be "civil" about it anymore.

The thread OP is ignorant bull(*)(*)(*)(*) that is not related to religion.

 

Your problem lies in that difference. Either you can't or you won't allow yourself to make the discernment. My bet is on the latter because, to the former, you've been given more than ample opportunity. Not just on this forum.

 

Gravity is caused by little fat creatures with 27 arms that all push molecules together. I know this is true because gravity cannot be proven.

 

LOL, that's astrology. LMAO

Wow, you couldn't possibly make this any easier for us.

 

Birds are feathered dinosaurs. They are therapod dinosaurs that fly. That's all they are.

What are you smoking and where can I get some?

Secondary flightlessness is common. That's what is believed to have happened to some dromaeosaurs, in fact.

 

LOL

And to think that this has been going on for at least two years. Mindblowing.

 

What do you think, is the criminal subconsciously trying to get caught, or is he really that ignorant?

Methinks the bridge collapsed.

 

Do you have an ability to form long-term memories or something? I know that I've repeatedly told you that evolution occurs on the population level, not the level of the individual. A few single mutations in an organism that prevent it from breeding with other members of its species will not reproduce; if those mutations do not prevent it from breeding, then it has a probability of reproducing and having those mutations in the allele(s) get fixed in the population.

It's like a mechanic trying to explain to a customer that they need their serpentine belt replaced and the person replying "what? a snake in my car? that's ridiculous!"

Except the conversation repeats itself for THREE (*)(*)(*)(*)ING YEARS.

 

To be honest, I have no idea. I've talked with tons of creationists back when I found it interesting but I haven't seen anything like this before.

 

Lets start off with one REALLY simple question:

Are human beings primates?

 

Waaaaa

You are one of the religious that I stated from the beginning and just been had... Don't get mad... accept what you are and know that because of YOU this thread makes it to the religious forum...

We thank you for not knowing crap about evolution and posting your posts...

I thank you!

 

What? I'm not following - your talking in riddles again.

There has been nothing that I did not provide a link from well known sites, that the poster was wrong.

It is a faith. Period.

Or - you can just end this and provide us with how evolution (common descent) passed from a hypothesis to a theory using the scientific method. You can end it all right here and right now.

Please provide a link...

 

Gravity can be proven by math genius... You have no clue what your talking about religous one...