Fani Willis Hit With a New Accusation

https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-new-accusation-wiretap-act-trump-rico-case-1886896

It appears Fani Willis is the gift that keeps on giving. It appears she has committed a felony for recording one of Harrison Floyd's attorneys out of Maryland, a two-party consent state. This is punishable by up to five years in prison and fines of up to $10,000. To put it bluntly, Harrison Floyd and Fani Willis have a tumultuous relationship. She put a lot of effort into having his bond revoked over some Twitter posts and was outraged when the judge only issued a warning, saying any violations were not severe enough to revoke his bond. Fani hilariously claimed a Twitter post tagging Raffensperger that read "we want the truth" was an illegal "threat." Fani brought in a witness in the case who was tagged in one of these posts, and during cross, it appeared he didn't even know about it until Fani called him and asked him to testify saying his feelings were hurt in an effort to revoke Harrison Floyd's bond.

Floyd has since kept posting negatively about Fani, which is not against the rules of his bond. One of his recent tweets called her a "DEI thug with a law license."

Meanwhile, Jocelyn Wade has filed contempt of court proceedings against Nathan Wade, saying he hasn't been paying his spousal/child support, and she is in desperate need of medical treatment that she cannot afford without the court-ordered support she has not been receiving.

 

No one is above the law. Clearly Fani needs to go to prison if this is what the law calls for.

 

Fans seems to operate like a secret Trump plant.

 

I wondered is AOC was a republican plant. Hard to believe anyone could be that stupid and lived as long as she has.

 

Some of the defendants are allegedly seeking a gag order against Fani Willis due to her improper extrajudicial comments about the case and invoking race into the public discussion. The holdout seems to be that they worry any gags or discipline imposed on Fani at the current level could give the appellate court a reason to keep her on the case due to the sanctions reigning her in to some degree. Part of their argument to disqualify her is due to what the judge called "legally improper" (ie- illegal due process violation) public statements about the defendants and the case.

 

Oh no!
Another accusation!

This one will do it and completely exonerate individual 1

 

Trouble is that Fani Willis is not the one on trial. One of the defendants is a sore loser. Let's see, what was his name?

 

Fani Willis is a real piece of work. She represents part of the problem with our justice system. Look at graphs and study polls and pour over statistics, but we the people know crime in our big cities is out of control and we know why -- liberal DA's who go after conservatives rather than criminals and liberal judges who release criminals back on the street.

 

She still committed a crime, what do you say about that?

 

Trump allegedly committed crimes, and the Georgia Rico case is against him and his co-conspirators.

 

No, no, no…you must have misunderstood what I posted. This thread is about Willis and she committed a crime. What should happen to her?

 

Just another Trump delay tactic, like all the trials. Do you really think his lawyers would be using all these delay tactics if he was innocent.

 

How long did it take for Hunter Biden to see the inside of a courtroom?

I’m sure the delaying tactics aren’t Trump’s idea because he isn’t a lawyer. I’m sure his lawyers are doing what is in the best interests of their client.

 

We'll just hope and pray that justice is served on sore loser Trump for his part in the January 6th insurrection, where he sat and watched the events unfold on TV. Nine people died as a result. He had exhausted all his legal court options. Instead of conceding victory to Biden, the sore loser started a "Stop the Steal" campaign, and summoned a mob to Washington. Him and his co-conspirators planned False Elector Plots to try to overturn the vote of the American people - my vote.

 

9 people died on 1/6? Do you have the specifics of each death? The last I heard, the left was saying 6 people died with one person, a cop, beaten to death with a fire extinguisher which turned out to not be true. Another so called victim died either weeks or months after 1/6 when a Muslim killed him. The ONLY person I know for sure who died on 1/6 was an unarmed woman who was shot while standing on the other side of a door from the shooter who was a cop.

 

Here you go --- Details in article. Summary below.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/us/politics/jan-6-capitol-deaths.html

A bipartisan Senate report, released in June, found that the seven deaths were connected to the Capitol attack. But the report was issued a month before two Metropolitan Police officers — Gunther Hashida and Kyle DeFreytag — died by suicide in July.

 

Fani is just a great example of the culture she represents!

 

You linked to a pay wall.

 

Steve, they've heard this stuff on their media so much they believe it to be true, like so many other things. Problem is, if they get away from their TV, they vote!

 

You can copy it before the pay wall activates.

WASHINGTON — As a pro-Trump protest turned into a violent attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6 last year, four people in the crowd died.

• Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as rioters tried to breach the House chamber.
  
• Kevin D. Greeson died of a heart attack, collapsing on the sidewalk west of the Capitol on Jan. 6.
  
• Rosanne Boyland appeared to have been crushed in a stampede of fellow rioters as they surged against the police.
  
• Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke.
  

Mr. Greeson and Mr. Philips died of natural causes, the Washington medical examiner said in April. He added that Ms. Boyland’s death was caused by an accidental overdose.

In the days and weeks after the riot, five police officers who had served at the Capitol on Jan. 6 died.

• Officer Brian D. Sicknick of the Capitol Police, who was attacked by the mob, died on Jan. 7.
  
• Officer Jeffrey Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department killed himself after the attack.
  
• Officer Howard S. Liebengood of the Capitol Police also died by suicide four days afterward.
  

The Capitol Police had previously said that Officer Sicknick died from injuries sustained “while physically engaging with protesters.” The Washington medical examiner later ruled that he had died of natural causes: multiple strokes that occurred hours after Officer Sicknick’s confrontation with the mob. The medical examiner added, however, that “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”

A bipartisan Senate report, released in June, found that the seven deaths were connected to the Capitol attack. But the report was issued a month before two Metropolitan Police officers — Gunther Hashida and Kyle DeFreytag — died by suicide in July.

The police agencies have not classified the four total suicides as “line of duty” deaths that would provide the victims’ families with enhanced benefits. Washington law excludes suicide deaths from the line-of-duty designation.

 

Biden killed my grandma who died of a stroke after attending a political rally. When will he be put in jail?

 

Georgia is a one party consent state. Clearly she is going by the rules in her state.

Maryland is a two party consent state.

So, it's not clear cut in interstate phone calls in this circumstance.

Given the above, it's doubtful she will face any legal problem if she decided contemporaneously (on the fly) to record the conversation given that she can't be expected to know all the laws in every state on this particular issue. Now, if she were going to make a preplanned recorded call to Maryland, the onus would be stronger on her to know the rules in Maryland, and get consent, given that Maryland is the stricter of the two states. So, here, context is everything.

This sounds like she recorded him as an afterthought (on the fly), to me:

"She did reach out to us, one of my colleagues in Maryland, and was rude, abrupt with him on the phone, and he was dealing with the Maryland case and I was dealing with the Georgia case, and she ended up recording him," Kachouroff said.

I doubt she is in legal jeopardy on this one.

 

She's like the cop who has no problem pulling you over for speeding or not using a signal and then goes and does that all day long herself thinking that she's above the law.

She has to be functionally retarded to think that it's okay for her to record a call like that without consent. Or she just thinks she's so special that no one can do a damn thing about it

 

It would seem like as a lawyer she should be aware of these sort of things and err on the side of caution.

https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2023...law, one-party,when called across state lines.

Third-Party Recording
Recording calls where one party is in a two-party consent state and the other is in a one-party consent state can be legally challenging. The strictest consent laws among the involved states usually apply.

 

I would draw distinctions between the peaceful protestors and the insurrectionists, but that is being too generous to Sore Loser Trump, who had exhausted all his legal challenges, and should have conceded the election. Instead he organized a STOP THE STEAL rally, which was totally unfounded.

Anybody who votes for Sore Loser Trump can expect more of the same.