I made it nice and big so that he would see it TWICE. I would hope he realized I saw it there. And what it meant. But then I don't think reading for comprehension is his strong suit.
There's no "if's" in life? I will if he didn't say that. Are you going to apologize to me if he did say it? PS, still waiting for your answer.
Just want to clarify your answer so you don't later say "That's not what I said/meant blah blah blah." Isn't that the prudent thing to do? Waiting for you to clarify and waiting for Fangbeer to answer. (Why do you think he's afraid to?)
I'm trying to if I'm wrong. I'll freely admit I was wrong [and apologize] that you made a claim that you didn't. Which one(s) was I wrong about: - was a Ground Zero volunteer - contacted Shanks volunteers, who told him most of 93 was buried - has photos and video from them proving the buried claim - dear family friends with Flight 77 passenger victim Asia Cottom - truth blogger convicted of pedo I did, I said you were the source, duh.
No. You're waiting because you can't support your claim. I answered your question. At least one of your claims is a lie, the rest are suspect as a result. The answer to your question is that your question's premise is false. How do you answer the question, "when did you stop beating your wife?" The answer is that the question's premise is false. Now you should apologize to Hannibal for inventing a story about pedophilia.
We'll find out soon enough. You really didn't. *If* he said these, which ones you think would be of a gross nature: - was a Ground Zero volunteer - contacted Shanks volunteers, who told him most of 93 was buried - has photos and video from them proving the buried claim - dear family friends with Flight 77 passenger victim Asia Cottom - truth blogger convicted of pedo You're proof of that? Pretend it's a hypothetical then. If he didn't say it, I will. You can see that's I've been asking him several times now if he said those things so I can apologize if he didn't. Not sure what's taking him so long to answer -- just like you.
You have absolutely no intention of ever providing said link to the pedo-blogger. So, in honor of said non-existent link, I'll provide a stand-in for that blogger.
Does that blogger have proof he was a pedo on his site? He must be brazen to do so, so post it if you like. Since you directed this demand at Hannibal, it has to be assumed that he posted some kind of info on this site. That should be pretty easy to find, no?
How is TOS violated by claiming that a truth blogger was convicted of pedophilia? I don't see that in the TOS anywhere. His comment couldn't have been deleted from this forum unless it violated some rule. What rule did it violate?
Well I'm asking the source, so we'll soon see -- or maybe we won't soon see since he seems to be taking an extraordinarily long time to answer.
So we're dealing in ifs and maybes? That's hardly conclusive evidence that you haven't completely made up the whole mess. Are you just pulling at straws or are you claiming that you have some sort of inside information about a post that was deleted?
Are you merely speculating as usual, or do you know something more about this? Since you were the one who made the claim in this thread that this existed somewhere, the anus is on you to provide it. You got something, anything? I actually looked at some old threads and found nothing. Deleted posts don't really provide any kind of information because they could have contained anything. Since you seem privy to some type of detail (you know, the claim you made), maybe you shouldn't take such an extraordinarily long time providing it. If you can't provide proof of this allegation, I'll report you for harassment if Hannibal hasn't already done so.
He did provide source info, but you appear to be unwilling to do so with your claim. Got a phone number, mailing address, anything? If not, then your batting average will get you sent down to the minors.
I stand behind any claim I've made. If you can link to it, and I said it, I stand behind it. You claim I made a statement. Show me where.
This thread has been fruitful. All I've gotten out of if is that the OP's title was a lie, and, apparently, there's some blogger out there who's a pedo. Some really interesting stuff there.......derp.
I wonder which blogger he's referring to, and if he will ever provide a link to something I said. So far, the topic has just been about me.
This thread is in danger of being closed, if you want to continue please stay on topic and stop harassing others.
The good news is the someone can successfully claim someone was convicted of pedophilia without violating TOS. No proof EVER of Flight 93 being buried. Now we need to close the thread because the subject is far too invasive, and needs to be shut down (as was similar previous threads).
