The story broke before the election and people voted for him regardless. This is all a smear campaign.
Whatever it is it was enough to get a Federal Magistrate to sign off on the Search Warrant. Mueller didn't do this entirely on his own, he couldn't in fact..
Just like the FISA warrant was issued by a judge based on a Russian dossier paid for by the D party which was not disclosed to the judge ??
Listen Sarah, Im not sure if you're familiar with national security there in Kremlin but people are really concerned about it in the US especially after Trump. So there are actually things risking national security if a stupid attorney pays porn stars hush money on behalf of world's strongest commander in chief. You keep playin dumb I keep making sure your role gets stuck on you alright...
My understanding was it was regular warrant, not a FISA one, and part of a completely different case. And what about those Cubs this year? Weren't they great? That has about as much relevance. You shouldn't use tactics which were among the favorites of the Stalinists, it betrays your origins
?????? The alleged sex was given for free according to stormy. Where do you see prostitution here? And the alleged campaign violations would be a civil matter not criminal. You are totally lost here on this topic. Your views are a product of your ideology.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/03/politics/alex-van-der-zwaan-sentencing/index.html There was a dutch lawyer convicted. Rest of the details he made up.
OKAY - another perjury trap. No actual crime committed. It’s reassuring to know that our highest level crime fighters are protecting our welfare in this manner.
Some of the right says she was a prostitute and some don't: they can't get their story straight. The "alleged campaign" contribution is the problem here.
Whether she is a prostitute is irrelevant because the allegations BY HER is that she gave it willingly and for no charge. And the campaign contribution is still a civil matter not criminal. Try to focus on the relevant and quit running to irelevancy
I don't know and the relevance of that is up to the court if it goes to trial. The fact of the matter is that Mueller did not "break in" as Trump is saying. The warrant is legal on the face of it and that's all that is needed now. If a warrant is illegal that will come out at the trial. Oh and the illegality of the FISA warrant is far from established.
You are kind of a one trick pony, aren't you. Feel free to point to ANYTHING specific that you do not think I get or know. BECAUSE, from my first post in the thread I pointed out he was