Florida school bus beatdown goes unnoticed by self-styled civil rights activists

I think that the whole civil rights debate, and the Zimmerman forum, is their excuse to post anti-black propaganda.

 

.........as opposed to anti-white rhetoric?

 

'Whitey' wins another one and Blacks loose again. Bottom line the Black 'community' climbed onto a wanna-be-gang-banger's wagon and made him their 'Poster Boy' but the little Black cherub turned out to be just another young Black thug who got shot while he was committing felony assault and now they are embarrassed and that is why they are acting like babies.
Tip of the day: Next time you all decide to elevate a young Black cherub to sainthood make sure you check them out more carefully first or you all will once again end up with 'collard greens' on your face.

 

This is racially-charged language. It may be legal, but it's despicable.

I don't care who 'wins' and don't involve me in your race war.

Even though Zimmerman has admitted to a violent criminal history, I have never portrayed Martin as a "cherub" or a "saint". However, he did nothing to warrant being pursued or having the cops called on him that night. He'd still be alive today if Zimmerman hadn't targeted him.

What proof do you have that Martin committed a felony assault? Zimmerman's acquittal doesn't prove this whatsoever.

 

Oh Idk....maybe the documented, trial evidenced, photographic proof of injuries
Testimonies under oath in court by independant witnesses.


But before you say "post proof" just know, its all been documented and linked so many times on pf.com its as common knowledge as the fact that Martin is dead.

All you do by not accepting the knowledge that trayvon assaulted Zimmerman is you have either lived under a rock for the past two years. ... (ignorance) or you are being dishonest and ignoring all the evidence because it doesn't suit your agenda. Constantly demanding links is simply trying to divert the discussion when it meets opposition to your made up story

 

Who cares? They're just poor victims of circumstance. Caught up in a system of institutional discrimination. They can't help themselves. The white boy simply deserves the beat down for being born the wrong color. If he were more tolerant, he wouldn't have been so racist as to be born the same color as people who owned slaves. Plus he has white privilege. So this is just leveling the playing field. It's an affirmative action beating, if you will. And if he were a better person, he would understand why he should accept his beating and why the black kids were justified in giving it to him. Because that's how racial tolerance works.

 

I don't agree with that. 3 kids mauling another kid on video is different from a man finding a kid "suspicious" just because he is black.

- - - Updated - - -

No, I think black leaders would be crying had the 3 that were on the attack not been charged with a crime. Big difference.

 

So you advocate violent crime ? As well as the use of the idiot word "snitch". Hint: that's a word criminals use. Could that be why you're OK with violent crime ?

 

There wasn't enough evidence for an arrestwith z. However, never let that stop racebaiting gun control agendusts from forcing a trial anyways (and then act surprised and mad that there wasn't enough evidence to convict)

 

A dead unarmed 17yr old that was minding his own business before Zimmerman came along was enough for me.

I own several guns, don't have a problem with anyone carrying a gun. Now with that said I do have a problem with a wanna be coward with a gun following an unarmed teenager in the night that was doing nothing wrong and ends up dead. I have a big problem with that.

 

So, you WERE there and saw it all.......glad you testified that at trial..................well, the prosecutor still lost with all of your valuable testimony

 

Did they really lose or was the verdict in before the trial started.

 

technically, he was innocent under SYG laws. The trial was a mere formality. The trial proved it.
........the prosecutors rush to trial, the judges attempt to influence the jury, and total lack of evidence just proved Z story.
I've said it before, and in case you didn't catch it, I had no preconceived notion about guilt or innocence. If he had never been tried, that would have been interpreted as innocence due to self-defense. All the pertinent questions were asked at trial. Just because you are at odds with it is your problem.
sbb, you really need to give this one up................you're entire approach to this issue is starting to look foolish, IMO.

 

The fact that you own guns concerns me. With all of this ranting and raving by you, hell, you're too close to the edge to be trusted with one.....and all you are doing is guessing. None of us were there, not you, not me, none of the others in this forum were there. But some are willing to hunt a man down just because somehow, you've managed to convince yourselves of some alternate ending. Have you asked yourself, what if what Zimmerman says is true? Can you afford to be wrong?

 

Really, he should have been guilty under SYG laws. Trayvon was the one standing his ground, since he didn't go in pursuit of Zimmerman.

Actually it was just the stacked jury that got him over.

I had one and I knew when I saw that all white jury what the outcome would be.

I disagree, there were many pertinent questions that were never asked at trial.

Well we know what opinions are like. Funny, people told Emmitt Till's mother the same thing until the day she died.

 

What should concern you is a grown man with a gun murdering an unarmed teenager, thats what should concern you.

Hmmm, I have never killed anyone with one of my guns, but you put your faith in a coward with a gun who has murdered an unarmed teenager who was just mindng his own business. Sounds like you need to look at the man in the morror instead of worrying about WTF I might do.

I didn't need to be there to see what happened.

So you are saying that you are such a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) of a man that you have to shot a kid in a fist fight because you may have been getting your ass whooped. I don't believe a word of what he said, but if that was the case, what does that say about you?

 

I am done and over you....................your bigotry no longer astounds me..................we are done.
You weren't there, You are not a lawyer, and you have no idea what you are taking about...................

 

There wasn't enough evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt, which is intentionally a very high bar set to protect the innocent. I think Zimmerman is guilty of manslaughter, but the jury reached the correct verdict for lack of evidence. Now it is up to Florida citizens to either rewrite the law or live with it.

- - - Updated - - -

You support schoolyard kids dealing drugs? I think it's immoral and hope you do not personally profit from selling drugs to kids.

 

your "minding his own business' part is very subjective.... and even if you are 100% correct, and trayvon was doing nothing wrong, attacking a guy who is allowed to ask what he's doing there, because he looks gay, is what caused trayvon martins death....not Zimmerman thinking an innocent kid is up to no good.

If you walk in my neighborhood, I may question your need to be there. You dont have to answer me, you can tell me to eff off..... but if you jump me, in Florida, I'm allowed to shoot you whether or not you had a legitimate reason or not



I own several guns, don't have a problem with anyone carrying a gun. Now with that said I do have a problem with a wanna be coward with a gun following an unarmed teenager in the night that was doing nothing wrong and ends up dead. I have a big problem with that.[/QUOTE]

 

So is determining that he is up to no good, on drugs, then pursuing him, becoming involved in an incident which results in shooting him.

 

My bigotry, it is you and your ilk that try and villify an unarmed, black teenager just walking home minding his own business who was pursued and murdered by a coward with a gun. Had Trayvon been white you and your ilk would have been calling for Zimmerman's head on a pike.

 

How many times have you jumped out of your vehilce and chased a teenager into the dark who was minding his own business?

You may, but since you have no legal authority to question me about anything I would probably tell you to GFY.

Well I guess it would depend who can draw the fastest.

 

nope, you're wrong again. I have said that I stood by what ever the jury decided.
and again, you weren't there, you didn't know the family of either, personally or otherwise and as a result you are only speculating about both, AFTER the fact. Yep, your bigotry............
Trayon Martin was no angel...........that much is coming forward.
so much speculation leading nowhere is going to be the biggest failure of all of this...........
again, you actually cannot prove one word of your statement, so it is merely your opinion. Either that..........or produce your irrefutable proven facts that proves anything you say

 

Yes but in all fairness what did the Zimmerman / Martin incident have to do with civil rights violations ? Usually in a civil rights violation case, there needs to be a public official doing the violating of the rights. With the Zimmerman killing there was no public official. In this bus beat down there was a black bus driver that was a government employee that did not lift a finger to stop the black guys from beating up the one little white kid.

 

Again, nothing illegal in observing, even confronting.....

Trayvon chose to escalate it by making it illegal.