For those who think the election doubters have no grounds-

Officials in Detroit illegally blocked Republican poll challengers’ access,
covered the windows called the cops, and denied lawful challenges in order to
count ballots in secret.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/po...nter-challengers-detroit-michigan/6164715002/

 

You're saying that there should be questions, because Trump was there. Yep, that's the mindset of the left. They have the conclusion in advance of an event or issue.....

 

No, I am saying that it is not surprising that there are ZERO questions from the RW about election integrity -- because Trump won.

This is really not about election integrity, it is about Trump winning or not. If he wins, everything is fine and dandy. If he doesn't win, it was stolen from him. You and I both know that if Haley or DeSantis had won last night's caucus, this would have been his accusation.

 

Maricopa County accepted 20,500 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020,
including 18,000 – more than the entire election margin – on Nov. 4 picked up
from the U.S. Postal Service. By law, ballots must be received no later than 7
p.m. on Election Day, which was Nov. 3.

https://verityvote.us/long-withheld...il-ballots-received-after-the-legal-deadline/

 

Some of the rhetoric would follow that. But- once the conditions exist where people are sure they can no longer trust the integrity of elections, that is going to happen. My belief that the 2000 election was fraudulent does not come from whom I prefer- but from the many elements that scream it's not legit. If the Kentucky Derby ran in the midst of a fog, and at the finish line a donkey came across first. I would have the same doubts. That's the parallel. I'm sure the person behind the donkey will object. You may not know where it came from, but you absolutely know it's not possible that it won the race.

 

And we understand that as longe as votes <= registrations the election is probably valid. Democrats that that relationship as a sign they haven't worked hard enough to create votes.

 

So now your are changing to a brand new claim: you are now saying there were more votes than registrations. That's different from the previous claim. Do we want to go with this nonsense now?

 

Many people think that last night's winner is the donkey in your parable. Did he cheat?

 

[

Many people think there are too many parrots on the left, and not enough wise owls watching the nest.

 

The other half was LBJ's manipulation of the state of Texas vote.

JFK's campaign all but admitted that that fraudulent votes in Chicago and Texas might probably change the results. Nixon was quite certain of it. Nixon chose not to contest it to ward off a constitutional crises.

 

Well, yes. I have no clue how the number of registered voters can exceed the number of voters in a district.

 

Let's say that there are 1,000 registered voters in a district and one dies tomorrow. Are there now more registered voters than voters? This isn't complicated. Your average child can figure this out quite easily.

 

Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according
to the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an
election with this type of discrepancy.

 

I'd ask for a source, but we both know this **** is just made up turds with no basis to support them.

 

So the new claim (which is different from the one made before) is that there were MORE voters than registered voters in a district. You were lied to about that. Feel free to try to provide some evidence for your fringe claims.

Name ONE district where there were more voters than registered voters. This will be cute.

 

And you don't see bull**** in that? (or was that some other guy???)

 

Sure...
https://verityvote.us/pennsylvania-voter-deficit/

 

. . . no. I don't see why there should be some maaaaaagic spell that does that. I think it requires actual work and effort to accomplish. And you don't see why your magical thinking makes no sense (or was that some other guy???)

 

Cool. You able to actually talk about this or are you just doing the usual?

 

Yes? So? They get caught.
Else no one would know someone voted as a dead person.

I thing the data showed more dead people voted for trump in 2020. Probably 2016 also.

 

Are you able to actually read this or are you just doing the usual when you shown the truth and can not present a rebuttal...

Prove the article wrong or stop with the misinformation and propaganda.
Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according
to the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an
election with this type of discrepancy.

 

You are claiming there are more votes than voters . . . which you haven't actually shown . . . and now you are crying and demanding that I disprove something that you never actually demonstrated in the first place. So, to answer my original question: the ****ing usual.

 

Republican lawmakers, led by State Representative Frank Ryan, were tracking
the vote discrepancy in real time in the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors
(SURE) system. Ryan, a certified public accountant, initially reported that there
were 170,830 more votes than voters in the Presidential race, more than twice the
margin in Pennsylvania.56 “These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged
certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely
premature, unconfirmed, and in error,” the lawmakers said.

 

And maybe if you had included a link we could talk about this. There's a reason you didn't.

 

Yeah. Because the story that Biden recieved the most votes of any president in US history is totally believable.