Fully Automatic Glock with a 100 round magazine. Should this be legal?

You should have went all caps and bold on the word "CRAZY". They are defending themselves lmao

You have several responses, people sticking their hands in the air as CRAZY GUN OWNERS

 

You can't own one of those since they are post '86 production.

Of course this still doesn't prevent terrorists from acquiring them.

George Bush owns the one taken from Hussein.

 

Everything will be on the Cloud by then and it will automatically be reported by a bot.

 

I see that you are going to completely dodge the fact that semi handguns are the most used in mass shootings. You post a video about a 100 round Glock but neither the Glock or AR-15 used in Orlanda had 100 round mags.

Do you know how many mass shootings used a 100 round magazine full auto Glock? ZERO

https://kirbysandersbiz.wordpress.c...used-in-contemporary-american-mass-shootings/

So why the hell do you post a video about it and call it dangerous when its never been used?

 

You can't buy a full auto Glock in America. Thread fail.

 

live in freedom, as long as you do no harm to your fellow man.

 

I believe Glock made these for a while, and then stopped for whatever reason.

Should they be legal? I think they are more likely to kill the person operating them than anyone else. They do not look particularly ergo or safe.

 

No, you are simply Obtuse.

You see, The Second Amendment is a Guarantee of Our Uninfringed Right to keep and bear Arms.

Our argument against gun control has been; Why do gun banners want to restrict My Right to keep and Bear Arms when you can't do anything about the Criminals bearing arms ?

No one has asked why there are laws against Murder or Speeding, regardless of whether or not people will violate the applicable laws.

 

last I checked, the guys making the youtube videos and various models of 3D printed metal guns... all use localized machines... and I'm quite certain criminals who want to mass produce the guns, will be just as capable of connecting a wire to a computer, rather than to the internet where they can be discovered... its already crazy how many millions of downloads the current 3D printed guns have... what are the odds the FBI tracked that and was able to identify all the foreign nationals who now link to the plans on their own websites which constantly change and get moved around... or on the dark net where the odds of being traced are even less likely...

so no, I won't trust it will all be in the cloud and tracked, it will be a few dumb ones who get caught, I'm never worried about dumb ones who get caught, its the smart ones who don't that worry me...

 

Please don't tell me that you are dumb enough to actually believe that your average American can just buy that and then head out to the gun range.

Fully Vetted:

Doctor listed on psych-evaluation carried out on Omar Mateen by G4S says she never saw him and was not living in Florida at the time it was conducted. “A doctor who is listed on the psychological evaluation for Orlando shooter, Omar Mateen, said she did not see him and she was not even living in Florida at the time when G4S security firm ordered the evaluation. Psychologist, Dr Carol Nudelman, who now lives in Colorado, said in a statement released through her attorneys to the Miami Herald that she never evaluated Mateen nine years ago for G4S, a security firm that was known as Wackenhut at the time. However, Nudelman’s name appears on the document in Florida’s state records, which cleared Mateen to carry a firearm as a private security guard.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ar-Mateen-says-did-not-him.html#ixzz4BwslqaT7

Looks like yet another government screw up. And why was Obama walking guns to the Mexican Drug cartels, again? And why is Obama the biggest arms seller in the world since WWII? And why is he flooding the country with improperly vetted refugees from terrorist spawning regions? And why are we experiencing a sharp uptick in civilian slaughters by Islamists? And now he wants to talk about Republicans and gun control?

How about we talk about his flooding the world with weapons while he floods the nation with Islamists?

 

Kinda hard to conceal the mag don't you think? Plus if ten other guys were armed then machine gun isn't going to do you much good especially if your out in the open.

 

The Glock 18 is currently available to Law Enforcement Agencies and Military, and assorted Federal Agencies, the actual parts cost is low, and the design is quite simple, After 1986, Civilian Transferable Glock 18s or Transferable conversions, are not available to the General Public anymore...

And if there are any Pre 1986 Civilian Transferable Glock 18s or Transferable conversions left, the cost would be rather prohibitive.

 

no firearm should be banned for honest citizens to own. Any such regulation (based on a dishonest expansion of the commerce clause) violates the Constitution and is an affront to the foundation this country was based on.


BTW you don't need a license to own a car that can compete at the Formula One level and you don't need a license to operate it on non-public property

 

So you think that people on the terrorist watch list should be able to buy this item at the McGun Drive Through. Correct?

Or are you agreeing with me that this REGULATED item is regulated for a reason and regulations don't deprive anyone of owning this item?

 

Glock didn't make the item lmao.

Modifications manufacturers did.

- - - Updated - - -

I have a winter coat that has inside pockets that can hold VHS tapes. You tell me.

- - - Updated - - -

So you think the average citizen should be allowed to own an ARMED tank?

 

What you are discussing is Liberty. And you end with "Fixate on Liberty until those Liberties infringe the Liberties of others."

Risk vs. Reward is how you weight Liberty.

I want to own the item in the OP. Looks extremely fun, like a toy.

Will I want to force this item to be legal because it looks like a fun toy?

Nope. I'm not an overgrown child.

 

Glock makes the G18. If someone does make a modification kit, it is just as illegal to own as the actual gun itself.

Why shouldn't someone who is able to afford an armed tank be able to? Anyone who can actually afford such an item has way to much to lose by using it illegally.

 

Only the unorganized militia has a problem with it; nothing but a bunch of gun lovers who don't love their republic as much as they claim to love their guns.

 

You are a Silly Billy Goat, when you are attacked at 3 am by a Drug Crazed home invader, bent on killing you, and you get shot, manage to grab your 1911 and return fire eliminating the threat to your life, then come and talk to me about guns.
Otherwise, go pound sand.

 

None of this matters....Gun control is a diversionary tactic. It's about control...not about guns. The issue is used as a platform, from which to advance other agenda's ......... How do i know this......? Because it's already illegal to shoot people.....has been for a long time. You cant shoot people with any kind of gun, with any size magazine capacity, regardless of how or where it was purchased... Making laws pertaining to this gun...or that gun, is redundant BS...........HEY.........Look over there.......................................

 

It is indeed wonderful to see someone with the Intellect to discern such truth !

 

Correct. Gun control, in the context with criminals, is an obvious oxymoron.

- - - Updated - - -

Gun control stimulates more gun crime.

 

There will never be any effective regulation of the kinds of weapons a criminal can possess. Gun control, as it relates to criminals is pure folly.

 

Yes we've seen how well the anti-gun agenda worked against the France and San Bernardino attackers.

Anyone bent on mass murder is going to ignore any and all gun laws in existence because as you pointed out.....murder is already highly illegal.

 

Is it immoral to violate the law?