GAY TEACHER READS HOMOSEXUAL STORY TO 3RD GRADERS

Those who don't know what a logical fallacy is (that would be you) are just like people who urinate out in public--they don't tend to care what others think.

Thanks for proving it to me.

 

I don't need to be imaginative I caught you red-handed.

you can leave at any time you can stop posting to me at anytime I'm kind of having fun.

except I quoted your words

I quoted your words. Did someone hack your account and type in that post?

saying because two things happened to be correlated that one causes the other.

 

People that commit logical fallacy after logical fallacy after logical fallacy then talk about what they think, don't seem to Garner much empathy for what they think.

 

They aren't congruent. One is a relationship with a person of the same sex and the other is sexual fetishization of an object.

They aren't congruent because they're both unusual.

 

Except you didn't.

This is getting stupid.

So your idea of having fun is having your arse handed to you...I see.

Question to you, do you like this more or having your anus pounded by a penis?

:facepalm:

For the umpteenth time, you didn't.

Thanks for your concern for my cyber-safety, however, no, I did NOT say that. You are misrepresenting what I said.

Except I never said homosexuality and coprophilia are correlated. You can't even read. No wonder you mis-used the false cause fallacy.

 

Who cares whether there is a relationship or not? They are both forms of sexual deviancy.

 

Except I committed no fallacy.

The false cause logical fallacy is not what you think it is. Speaking of which, is your definition for this term forthcoming? I asked you to provide it so that we know we are talking about the same thing.

 

But you did.

Than every debate sight and book that has a definition for it is wrong.

I already did 6 posts previous of this one.

 

Just too because something is unusual doesn't mean it's wrong.

 

Produce a link from a credible source for this term, then.

This is the link I got the definition from: http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/cause.html

 

I didn't say homosexuality is wrong. I say it's a form of sexual deviancy.

 

yes I did.

If it's stupid you can stop. I find it funny

watching people Express a delusion they know to be false to try and feel like they've won an argument is hilarious.

I'm a top. Though i do like oral.

so did someone hack your account and type the post I quoted?

if you didn't do it and I quoted your username doing it did a Ghost type it?

no you went farther and said they were congruent except you know different in a lot of ways.

you misused it

 

Okay.

http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/cause.html

I'm going by that definition.

Did you not say that homosexuality and coprophilia were congruent because they're unusual?

 

deviance simply means unusual.

 

I just might stop. I am getting sleepy. Usually boring posts (that would be yours) tend to make me want to fall asleep.

Except nowhere did I indicate that I wished to "win" an argument. You are projecting your own desires onto me.

Lol lol. Winning an online argument is important to your psyche.

So you are a homo that's a top. I must agree, this makes it slightly better (very, very, VERY slightly).

To calm your meager little psyche, no, my account is not hacked. But you seem to enjoy throwing this one out like it's some sort of a gem.

I said what I said, and yes you can quote the actual words I typed. However, you don't get what I am trying to convey. You are mis-representing what I am saying. I don't know if this is due to bad comprehension on your part or something else. Can't say for sure.

I did NOT say homosexuality and coprophilia are congruent. I did say that they are both instances of sexual deviancy.

 

So????

 

Better than being hetero? Yes, but I'd say very very much.

 

It isn't a question of being embarrassed, it's the female to female empathy, and the mother's life experience in how best to cope with it. Stop with the pathetic attempt at social engineering to suit your agenda fgs.

 

In my life code, something is either right or it's wrong. What you do is wrong and I'm not PC enough to accept it as being right.

 

Sorry but I'm not going to get into your word games, nor discuss the occasional exceptions to the norm.

 

than what in the hell are you posting on thus thread for? Do you think homosexuals are the norm?

 

Well male parents can be empathetic. But the experience isn't there. Is it necessary?

Too late.

 

Being that I'm not a enthusiast of homosexuality you prefer that I didn't post on the subject don't you? You'd rather I just shut up? I post on homosexual threads as a way of countering the unwanted thoughts which go with the practice, so it's a kind of protest at having been reminded of it when I'd much rather not be.

 

One more word outta you and I'll be talking to a moderator!

 

Go for it. I did nothing wrong. I simply asked questions. I was polite and friendly. I don't know why you became hostile.