Its funny that the ability to show just how off base your claims are makes me a "minion." You'd look less like someone who has no clue what they are talking about if you backed up those claims you made with some actual science. Or did the total sum of your "intense research" of the facility consist of reading a few articles on conspiracy theory websites?
I'd say you were lying Fraud,but that might get my hands slapped when you start whining....RF doesn't DO what you claim
Really,I mean why does Fraud think the HAARP array is in Alaska?...right under the northern auroral zone? It takes the sun to charge our atmoshere and cause auroras,along with heating the oceans causing sometimes violent weather patterns Does Fraud think we can come close to the energy output of a G type main sequence star???
People who believe these strange conspiracy theories are often small minded people who haven't lived up to their expected potential in life. Belief in these theories give these people a chance to feel important and smarter than other people they could never compete with in real life. We should pity them and treat them with the support they need.
Can't figure out what HAARP is utilized the most for. Weapons or weather modification? http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/pandora/haarp.html
Exactly WHY should we take the views of a economics professor on anything about HAARP seriously,Fraud? RF energy doesn't do those things..Pull your head out and deal with that
Why do they not reference any of this scientific evidence? They talk about claims people have made. They talk about an author that speculates things are possible, but they provide no science at all to back it up. I think it's also wonderful that the article admits: Great article. It doesn't support a thing you have said. It agrees with you, but people with stupid opinions do exist so...
....and the torch is "officially" passed, I guess. Oh, and agreed on the "stupid people with stupid opinions" part of your post (Just thought you'd like to know).
It's the M.O. Step one: Document a page from the codex of the religion. Step two: Call anyone that refuses to supplicate themselves a heretic. Step three: Return to step one. Truthers never bother to defend the claims made in the opinion pieces they supply as "evidence." They can't do that because the end game is always the total destruction of the claims that were made. Just look at the absence of an ability to defend the scientific claims made by the information provided by the HAARP CTer. EVERY one of the counter claims I have made can be checked. EVERY time I check a claim by a CTer I find that their reference material has been misconstrued, or taken out of context, or straight up lied about. For example, Bernard J. Eastlund is not the "H.A.A.R.P. patent holder" Bernard J. Eastlund did not invent a weather modification machine. H.A.A.R.P. does not "bounce 3.6 MW off of the ionosphere" So instead they call those who point out the errors and lies "shills" and run on to another topic content that they kept their theory intact. So goes the pattern. So predictable.
geeze,I learned about skip 40 years ago when I built my firstt radio shack shortwave radio, and studied it later for my amateur radio ticket....what is Fraud bringing?
Step 1..defend the "official". Say 911 is exactly what we're "officially" told that it was. Step two..defend the "official" position. Say HAARP is "official" nothing perverse of hidden, and is as stated "officially". Step three...defend the "official" position, and say both are completely on the up and up "officially". I think there's a pattern here.
Yep: you are shown evidence. You ignore it for awhile, then you wet your pants and squeal, then you run away. Over and over. Isn't it time for you to meet your buddies at the airport? - - - Updated - - - Yep. Constantly.
To include free Thorazine? Interesting, isn't it, that nobody from inside the project has gone rogue and blown the whistle on it all?