High Rise Building "Experts Speak Out" about 9/11

Discussion in '9/11' started by Brother Jonathan, Nov 27, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Experts Speak Out" was presented a few months ago on Denver's PBS TV. It was their most popular show in August. It is a well produced documentary, by professional high rise architects and engineers, on the events surrounding WTC Towers I & II and WTC Building 7 which collapsed later that afternoon on September 11, 2001. Some of the building professionals have 40 years of building experience. If you have not yet watched it ... it is well worth the two and a quarter hours.

    [video=youtube;X-V1CiuGMJo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo&feature=relmfu[/video]​
     
  2. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    When Quintierre signs off on Little Dickie's models, I'll give him ten minutes to draw a crowd before kissing his ass in Times
    square.
     
  3. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    [video=youtube;wKdi27dtycU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKdi27dtycU[/video]

    http://chrismohr911.com/

    I watched yours, did you watch mine?
     
  4. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I believe the High Rise Building Experts because they employ the Scientific Method of Proof in their assessment. You use ridicule to try and discredit them. That is standard operating procedure for people trying to hide the truth.

    Ridicule of Conspiracy Theories Focuses On Diffusing Criticism of the Powerful
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll: gimme a break.....troothers are SO persecuted
     
  6. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Like hell they do. Little Dickie can't even tell the differtence between PAINT and PYROTECH.
     
  7. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Standard operating procedure for truth deniers is ridicule. You have to ridicule Richard Gage because you can not refute his proofs. People do not like to be ridiculed and that more than anything has blocked more building professionals from joining the 9/11 truth movement. Now, the tables are turning. 9/11 liars will be ridiculed in the future for being so dumb. The video in the OP is very well done.
     
  8. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gage's "proofs" have been debunked. Maybe next time, he should use evidence...but, we know you don't have any of that either.
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Citation requested.
     
  10. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    is that why Truthers constantly ridicule, insult, and defame ANYONE who dares to refute their lies?
     
  11. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No Ronstar. What is going on is that truthers are trying to tell the truth. There are professional agents who ridicule people trying to tell the truth because they have so much to lose if the truth becomes known. Others simply believe the professional liars because the professional liars own all the TV networks, radio, and most newspapers. Then insults begin, and as a truther, it is impossible for me to determine if I am being challenged by a professional liar or simply some who believes the lie. It is the classic "Divide and Conquer" technique. I am willing to put up with ridicule from the professional liars in hopes that some who simply believe the lie will search for the truth. As that happens, the professional liars will stand out more and more.
     
  12. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
  13. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are many building experts in this video. Too numerous to post here on this forum. One of special note is the WTC Tower's own electrical engineer. Richard Humenn P.E. original WTC Chief Electrical Engineer had been inside the towers in restricted areas many many times. He knew the construction of the WTC Towers intimately.

    High Rise Building Experts from all over the world.
    MOD EDIT>>>SPAMMING <<<
     
  14. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    here's what a Truther "expert" knows about architecture and physics.

    [video=youtube;DFVoencqfZw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw[/video]
     
  15. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All the 9/11 liars have left is ridicule. Richard Gage does a good job in that video demonstrating free fall and the liars go straight to ridicule because they can't disprove what Richard Gage has proved.
     
  16. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol!!!

    really?

    you think comparing the WTC towers to cardboard boxes, shows a good undestanding of architecture and physics????

    lol!!!!
     
  17. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What Richard Gage demonstrated in that video was the concept of free fall and Newton's third law of motion. The cardboard box on the left went into free fall because there was nothing to stop it.

    The box on the right was dropped on top of the box under it and it did not crush it because the lower box kept it's structural integrity.

    The top of the towers crashing down on the lower towers can not crush the lower towers. Just like the box crashing down on lower box did not crush it.

    It's impossible exactly as Richard Gage presented. In order for the top box to come crashing down in free fall the structural integrity of the lower box would have had to be removed. Just like the top of the towers came crashing down to ground zero the structural integrity of the towers had to be removed.
     
  18. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    someone with a basic understanding of physics, engineering, architecture, and the difference between static and dynamic forces would NOT say such a silly thing.

    you sir, have exposed your complete lack of understanding.
     
  19. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ignoring that most of what Gage says is palpable nonsense, I posted for you in another thread a photo that proves the WTC towers were not in freefall. It does so by showing the exact effect (though not the bogus result) that Gage is demonstrating with his boxes.

    Why did you run away from it in a whiny snit?
     
  20. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The box on the left went into dynamic free fall because there were no static forces under it. The top box on the right went into dynamic free fall when it was dropped and was dynamic until it hit the structural integrity of the static force of the box below it. Just like the towers would do if the top towers were dropped onto the lower towers. It is physically impossible for the top towers to have crushed the lower towers.
     
  21. Quantumhead

    Quantumhead New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As if it actually needs pointing out, that claim is false. Professor Niels Harrit, the chemistry expert who headed the paper in which nano-thermite was identified in the WTC dust, after testing his samples, offered the hypothesis that he had discovered paint. He then went on to exhaustively discredit his hypothesis during the rest of the paper. He explained clearly that had the substance found been paint, it would not be highly energetic, and there would have been significant quantities of (among other things) zinc and magnesium discovered.

    You are not being truthful.
     
  22. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There was nothing underneath it at all... just like certain objects in the photo I posted that actually were in free fall.

    Ignoring that the lower box actually is a complete, undamaged integral box (something completely unlike the severely damaged lower section of the WTC towers), who here is surprised that a cardboard box could withstand a dynamic impact of a few micro-newtons?

    Too, too stupid. Let's talk about the effect of scale here.

    Take a mouse and an elephant to the roof of a two story house. Toss them both off. Tell me which one shakes it off and scurries away unharmed, and which one breaks every bone in its body, ruptures multiple internal organs, and then dies.

    That, my friend, is the difference between Mr. Gage's cardboard boxes and the WTC towers.
     
  23. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roflol: That is very funny Ronstar. That physical concept is exactly what the high rise building experts are trying to tell you about the towers in the OP. The top towers can not destroy the lower towers even if there was a dynamic load dropped on it. The lower portion of the towers would stop the upper portion of the towers just like the lower box stopped the upper box. I am convinced these high rise building experts understand Newton's third law of motion better than you. I agree with them.
     
  24. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Someday, a truther (or a birther or a creationist) will type an accusation that is not ironic and I will throw a party. With cake.

    1. All combustible small particles are "highly energetic." Ever see a grain silo explode? No thermite necessary.

    2. The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are perfectly consistent with carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. The red layer is an epoxy resin containing primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. Paint, in other words. The gray layer is the carbon steel.

    3. There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore whatever the red layer of the red/gray chips might be, it is not thermite or nano-thermite.

    4. Nano-thermite or thermite can't accomplish what truthers even claim in the first place. So its presence in the WTC wreckage would be gratuitous.
     
  25. Quantumhead

    Quantumhead New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is just ridiculous. It is people like you who drove Gage to performing experiments like that by denying basic high school physics. First you deny the existence of Newtonian mechanics, and then you try to ridicule Gage for showing you how it governs the behaviour of all mass.

    It is basically a flat out joke that anybody on Earth is stupid enough to think those towers didn't have explosives in them. Three thousand dead Americans will never have justice because of the stupidity, selfishness and apathy of the ones left alive. Isn't that grand?
     

Share This Page