Homosexuals do not belong in the House of GOD

I think it was quite productive to point out that marriage predates Christianity by thousands of years. After all that's what the OP was about. I think anyone who can't see that this is a productive point must have blinkers on.

 

What the actual (*)(*)(*)(*) did I just read. I think I'll choose to believe this guy is a skilled troll, as it's actually saddening to think that I might have spent time interacting with someone who genuinely hold such views.

 

Some Americans sent anthrax by mail, this does not mean American people in general want to spread the disease.

 

Buaahhahhaahhaaahaa!!!

Thanks, I needed that.

And I kinda agree. I wouldn't go somewhere where I'm not wanted. So I think it is reasonable for Homosexuals, that don't want to, to not go where you are.

 

G-d ...

I like how Jews have this mysticism about not calling their made-up god by name, because that would somehow give them power over It It's hard to get sillier than Christians, but that bit does just manage it.

 

Do you realise how stupid this sounds? Are you making this up or do you have scientific evidence?

1. There is no evidence Neanderthals were bi-sexual or even homosexual, although this probably occurred.

2. Please explain why homosexuality has always existed in East and South East Asia while there has been no evidence of Neanderthals ever populating those parts of the globe.

 

Thats some really rich material. Did you make all that up?

 

Most Gays try to oppose the idea by referring to Nazxi who made Je3ws wear the arm bands.
But the small tattoo near rhe belly button would not be publically noticeable.
It would be better than a quarantine.

It would save Gays from getting infected.
It might even save Straigth drug users who tend to use dirty needles.

 

Not exactly what I said, and not close to my point at all.

You assume the point is that Gayness is bad.
You react to the criticism that homosexuals are psychologically sick people, intent on hurting their father, or at least reducing him to a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) cat who will "Swallow" as Fromm called it.
You oppose promotion of the idea that Gays advance in their relationship with their mother, i.e., Oedipus Syndrome, by pairing up against daddy and twisting the knife right in his face.

But that is not the point at all.

The momentum of the Feminists and the Gays is too great to detour them now.
My goal is to get them to start making the proper decisions now that they are in power.

No matriarchy has ever lasted more than a generation or two.
Gays and women need to change their focus to see that surrounding patriarchies are their enemy, not daddy anymore.

And, they need think about their own fate if a dictator like Obama ever got installed, because dictators are Father Figures, and once they have the unquestionalbe power to govern, they turn on the Gays and the women, too, i.e. Hitler.


Rev. 17:3 So he carried me away (in the spirit of thought), into the wilderness (of my imagination) and I saw (as if) a woman, ...



.... (those who have Institutionalized a system of sexual seduction into a failed matrimony), sit upon a scarlet coloured beast (of a brazen and corrupt sexually misdirected economic system: [Dan 3:1-5]), full of names of (Pagan) blasphemy, having seven heads:
(which existed in (1) Egypt, (2) Assyria, (3) Babylon, (4) Persia/Mede, (5) Greece, (6) Rome (7) the whole of Western Culture to follow)...







... having ten horns upon these seven heads:
(1. Undivided Empire; capital Rome: [305 AD],

2. Western Roman Empire: (Romulus Augustus): [to 476 AD],

3. Eastern Roman: Byzantine Empire, [1453 AD]

4. Charlemagne, [800 - 1000 AD]

5. Holy Roman Empire, [1200 AD-1492 AD]

6. Italy, [Renaissance, 16th century]

7. Spain, [17th century]

8. France, [18th-19th Century]

9. Britain, [19th-20th century]

10. Nazi Germany, [20th century])


11. America next…?

 

Take a susceptible mind and collide them with an unhinged charismatic teacher and you get the drivel pasted above.
You have been abused, and you have no idea.

 

I think it's true that we have no right to wink at sins, but it goes farther than simply gayness. There are other behaviors that shouldn't be tolerated. http://www.jewfaq.org/613.htm I suppose we're gonna be kicking a lot of people out, considering the rules about letting a hired man "eat of the harvest he's harvested" and that a seller cannot cheat a buyer. Funny how the sex rules get all the press. What about the rules requiring a parapet on the roof?

 

Where is the condemnation of the unparapeted?
Christians are leaving so many deserving people unjudged.

 

heterosexuals have been destroying marrioages and families just fine on their own. gays marrying has zero effect upon heterosexual marriages or families.

the majority of aids cases worldwide are among heterosexuals.

 

Don't confuse the poor lad.

 

What a scrambled mess of a post.

No surprise that homophobes are misogynist as well.

You are projecting all kinds of nonsense. If you (personally) feel powerless or weak in the face of life... then don't hang that on women, but go MAN UP on your own behalf.

What a cop-out / idiocy looking to 'invent' / attribute responsibility / blame to women for gayness. The world is turning... and changing... and those resistant to change, wind up delusional and devoid of sense.

Living in the real world always preferable to making up stuff to suit / compliment our pathologies...

 

"Homosexuals do not belong in the House of GOD ????"
They have always had their own "house," the House of Eros so why is this even a question?



Christianity is the most recent expression of the sole monotheism that appeared 3362 years ago in Egypt.
That was when Moses first introduced the theory that sexual promiscuity destroys people, families, societies, nations, and even empires.

What we are personally witnesses to, today, is the demise of the whole Pan-American Empire.
The entire beast of the seven heads now sinks in the mire of the collapse, economically and socially, through out all Europe and America, dragging Asia and Eygpt and the Middle East with it.


Rev. 17:11 And the beast, (a brazen and corrupt, sexually misdirected economic system: [Dan 3:1-5]), that was until Rome), and is not (for a thousand years of Monasticism under Christ), even he is the eighth, (the Global Economy), and is of the seven, (Western Culture), and goeth into (Historical ignominy), perdition.

What I see in the Bible is evidence of a Social Science that the writers understood and one that worked.
Our behavior today will complete the Empirical Experiment they set up as evidence that their sociology actually works.

I suspect that if America does not change, which has never happened in all the other collapses of Empire, then the Chinese or the Muslim patriarchies will or could benefit from the evidence of our demise.

 

Of course what I say is immediately unpopular and one would expect women to react negatively and deefensively.

But I appeal to the Facts, which as Chris Rocks says, won;t matter in an argument with women in general.
Women havethe unique advantage, Chris says, that they don't have to be reasonable.

Even women tough, care about children more than the lying which could maintain their sacred place in society, immune tio criticism.
I appeal to the rationality that criticism of women ought be at least entertained without immediate rejection, since the Stats show kids of Single M others are abused to the point of their own destruction.

Since Single Mothers are a result of the Feminists' Sexual Revolution of 1960, and now @ 50% of the families in America, women need to at least examine what is actually transpiring today in regard to the kids.

 

I suppose you would also apply the same standard to heterosexuals since the majority of cases are amongst them.. But you clearly want to ignore that, that's why you ignored my earlier post.

Should we also do the same with Chlamydia, gonorrhea, genital warts, crabs? Where do you draw the line?

 

Hmmm...Prior to the Sexual Revolution and the legislation of Ni Fault Divorce, before 1950, for instance, marriages were almost sacred and Divorce rare.
Even when divorces occurred, it was shameful to the people involved, a sign of mutual failure, and rather unpopukar and not socially acceptable.

Divorced women had great social difficulties and were not so easily included in the social memebrship of the married woman.

But even today, in contrast with the 70% Divorce among Gays within the first 7 years, Straight marriages are very stable by comparison:




Notice that almost 70% of Stariht Marriages are intact after seven years.
Observe that after 20 years, half of the Straight Marriages are still viable, and that is AFTER the job of raising the family is pretty much over.

 

So, there were no single mothers before 1960, eh?

I guess you think there was no premarital sex, then, either.


You aint got your head on straight, son.

 

Where are the statistics regarding gay marriage, as it has only been around in the U.S. since 2004? If you are comparing marriage statistics to boyfriend relationships you are presenting a false equivalency.

 

Thread's > 500 posts. Feel free to start another.

Thanks
Shangrila
Site Moderator