Homosexuals do not belong in the House of GOD

I don't think so.

I've never seen a copyright symbol by the term Human Rights, nor seen any mention of them owning the patent in the history books.

I think this is bogus man.

 

I asked you whether, in your opinion, Lot's two daughters, whom he was prepared to send outside to be gang raped, had rights from Yahweh. What do you say?

And likewise for the poor nameless daughter of the nameless old man in Judges and the unnamed concubine? I guess that one's more easily answered, at least for the concubine, wouldn't you say? How about that "righteous" man having a concubine, eh? That makes for yet another interesting matter.

 

Only GOD and CHRISTIANS could have created "human rights"........

What.....you think commies or some other nation could have done the same???? NO, human rights is owned by CHRISTIAN AMERICANS, inspired by GOD'S WORD.

 

Uh huh, so women don't share in the same rights as men do, in your view.

I think the humanists and, in fact, the majority of human beings overall, are at least slightly more advanced than you in terms of morals and ethics.

 

Explain this.

 

Righteous men should not have concubines at all, and ought to confine all sex to their CHRISTIAN WIFE.

But, sometimes men are weak, and we sin......a concubine is better than sinning than going to a homosexual. There are degrees of evil. A concubine has already been defiled and thrown her lot in with Satan. So having sex with a concubine has been more permissible, in history, in the CHRISTIAN tradition, than other alternatives. For example, a senator cheating his wife with a concubine is not punished so harshly, as than he cheated his wife with a man as a homosexual, had sex with children, animals, or dead bodies.

Sexual crimes depend on the nature of the crime. Necrophilia, for example, is particularly heinous and disgusting. Society judges this crime very harshly.

 

Of course not

Men have more responsibilities, and harder responsibilities than women, in life. Men are responsible for SPIRITUALITY and a relationship with GOD, what is more important than spirituality???

NO

 

You act as though a concubine has a choice in the matter. She's the property of a man who uses her for his sexual pleasure, a sex slave.

You seem to be completely oblivious to the rights of women, as though they're not even human.

 

Well, I don't think there's much else I need to say to you or ask of you at this point. Your insanity and depravity are laid as bare as can be at this point.

 

1..a man could never "invent" human rights on his own. This signals that GOD must have created it, otherwise, where did human rights come from??

2..a man could never ENFORCE human rights, even if he did invent them. How can man, who is subject to CORRUPTION and IMPERFECTION, enforce the perfect system and morality of human rights? He would become corrupted by doing so. Human rights can ONLY be enforced, measured, and punished, by GOD. Christians are responsible for human rights, as GOD made TRUE CHRISTIANS His conduit for bringing human rights into existence.

 

Some are, some are not.........it depends on the particular people

As I repeat often........some people are CLOSER TO ANIMALS than others. These are types of people who are barely human, if human at all

What is the difference between ANIMAL and HUMAN????????? ANSWER THIS, DURANDAL!!!!!!! Don't avoid this question!!!

Begin to know the answer by accepting that ANIMALS CANNOT MARRY! This is the start of your answer, why can't animals marry in nature???? Why does marriage not exist, AT ALL, in the animal kingdom?

 

It's an idea. It comes from thinking, something you're evidently not much good at.

... Nevermind.

 

To answer your question, it would be necessary to define both terms. We are animals by definition, specifically mammals, more specifically primates. We set ourselves apart from other animals through our intellect, which has also come at the cost of being physically inferior, though overall we are not that different from our ape cousins. We have the benefit of a larger brain which gives us more advanced cognitive abilities and, together with our more unique physical features, certain other abilities the other primates lack, such as speech, which is of course reflective of our superior cognitive abilities. Plus, we're bipedal, which is pretty rare among non-avian animal groups. Of course, there exist clear signs of our having evolved from a quadrupedal stance in the past, such as where our sinuses drain, i.e. on top(!) when we're standing upright; they would function better if we were not upright-walking creatures.

As for marriage.. Many animals mate for life, and are in fact far better about following through with that than we humans and our primate cousins are.

If you're interested in the history of marriage, though, I'd suggest you research it. Maybe it will disabuse you of the crazy notion that Christians invented it

 

So mating for life and marriage are the same thing are they? Well, to an atheist whose entire fallacious concept of a relationship centers around sex and nothing else ... that would probably be so.

Also explains why you favor enslaving women for sexual purposes as well.

 

I was just quoting.

 

...

Idiots, both of you.

 

Who were you quoting? There are no quote marks in the post where you accused Neutral of beating off.

 

First off, you obviously DON'T know much about burden of proof. YOU are making a claim that it is a divinely inspired process. YOU have to back up that claim. I NEVER made the claim that marriage existed in nature. I do NOT have to back up a claim I did not make.

Yeah, only Chirstians have daughters. What the hell, are you on PCP or something? You're acting as if Christians have never raped or done anything wrong. You're a sick (*)(*)(*)(*)ing man, to be honest.

 

It was his post just before mine. It was a joke. If it's important to you you can look it up. You'll find it. If not, then that's ok too.

 

You're just an angry liberal who wants to use women as sluts and whores, as objects of disposal, and I call you out on your morally degenerate nature.

Typical lib

Don't hate me for your own sexual perversion, that's ALL YOU!!!!!!

 

You know what? Your entire argument is based on the assumptions that God exists and that your Bible is an accurate representation of that God's will. Good luck with providing any evidence for these things. This right here is the problem with democracy.

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
― Isaac Asimov

 

Well, it appears that the context of his statement was not repeated in your so-called quote; therefore, you made an open ended remark which may have been based on a partial listing of his statement, but the manner in which you expressed his words, shows that you intentionally did not use the same language which added description to what he was talking about. Yours was like a misrepresentation of what he said, because you did not insure that the context remained the same. At any rate, I was just curious about the so-called quotation which was not a quotation.

 

And yours is based on the opposite ... and you have zero evidence for any of it ... so good luck yourself. Or are just supposed to assume that your faith is actually science?

We know, you can't prove a negative, except you can, and curiously, all the atheists who say that are silent on that thread, but circling the wagons on this one? Hmmmm ... Odd that JUST the belief in God equates to blind support for homosexual marriage?

 

You're obsessed with animals. Are you secretly a dog or a cat?

Romance... a prelude to marriage... aah...