Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

How does gay marriage affect you?

Discussion in 'Gay & Lesbian Rights' started by Daggdag, Oct 15, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 4 of 5
  1. Uncle Meat

    Uncle Meat Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,948
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And many straight men do that with their female partners. Your point?
     
    Uncle Meat, Oct 21, 2011
    #76
  2. xsited1

    xsited1 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    211
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who are these women and what are their phone numbers??? :mrgreen:
     
    xsited1, Oct 21, 2011
    #77
  3. Uncle Meat

    Uncle Meat Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,948
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not telling :-D
     
    Uncle Meat, Oct 21, 2011
    #78
    xsited1 and (deleted member) like this.
  4. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Your argument is mainly irrelevant and certainly weak.

    It's better now, to simply assail the BS you are putting out, and remind others that your point of view should not be embraced overall.

    Think for yourselves folks; dixon just doesn't get it.
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 21, 2011
    #79
  5. Uncle Meat

    Uncle Meat Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,948
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He actually seems incapable of "getting it".
     
    Uncle Meat, Oct 21, 2011
    #80
  6. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I think it's a diversionary tactic (a distraction). Most people realize that paternity and procreation have little or nothing to do with homosexual people being denied the right to marry legally.
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 21, 2011
    #81
  7. PatrickT

    PatrickT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    16,593
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I support gay marriage for the reason that all Americans should have equal rights. I recognize that extending those rights to gay couples will increase my tax liability--I'm one of the minority who pays his income tax--so in that respect it would negatively effect me.
     
    PatrickT, Oct 21, 2011
    #82
  8. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I get it just fine. What you people cant get is that no one has claimed the capability or intention of a couple to procreate does play a part in whether a couple can marry
     
    dixon76710, Oct 21, 2011
    #83
  9. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113

    The success it has had in courts all across the country would indicate otherwise.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 21, 2011
    #84
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    YOU DID. your entire argument relies on it. your statement "the govn't licenses and regulates marriage because of procreation" means that the govn't requires procreation in order to get married. it doesn't work any other way.
     
    rahl, Oct 21, 2011
    #85
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it's actually LOSING in court.
     
    rahl, Oct 21, 2011
    #86
  12. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113

    ???? Marriage, by design, is intended to discriminate between the married and unmarried, NOT equal rights for "all Americans".
     
    dixon76710, Oct 21, 2011
    #87
  13. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Silly, fool logic. Means no such thing
     
    dixon76710, Oct 21, 2011
    #88
  14. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Many of the rulings are being reviewed as we speak. In any case, it is good and right for homosexual people to fight for equal rights.
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 21, 2011
    #89
  15. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    dixon, the manner in which you infer the importance of procreation, attaches your positions to such "logic".
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 21, 2011
    #90
  16. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, both you and Rahl seem to follow the same, silly fool logic.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 21, 2011
    #91
  17. PatrickT

    PatrickT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    16,593
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No, it isn't. In fact, that's a ridiculous definition of the intentions of laws pertaining to marriage.

    We are denying equal protection under the law to gay couples. In my opinion, that's wrong. I realize that in your opinion, it isn't.

    I also recognize that extending the benefits to gay couples would cost money. Probably less than Solyndra or Michelle Obama cost but still it would cost.
     
    PatrickT, Oct 21, 2011
    #92
  18. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What silliness. Of COURSE the laws that discriminate between the married and unmarried, were intended to do so.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 21, 2011
    #93
  19. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    No, we are merely seeking to challenge you openly, right here in this forum. If this screen name or portions of my actual character must be seen as 'foolish' because I'm wallowing in the poop-ridden MUD you spew... then so be it.

    I've got a little time and electricity to spend shooting up flares, to illuminate the things you say.
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 21, 2011
    #94
  20. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    retarded dixon logic. it means exactly that.
     
    rahl, Oct 21, 2011
    #95
  21. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't speak for johnny, but I don't follow silly fool logic. I'm using actual logic which is destroying your idiotic arguments.
     
    rahl, Oct 21, 2011
    #96
  22. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm with you! What I'm doing at this point, is every time dixon brings up the "irrelevant", I just shoot up a flare (so to speak) as a marker; saying... he did it AGAIN!! ;)

    You, I and numerous others have out-reasoned him on his persistent points of irrelevancy many times, for many weeks running. It's downright comical to me now... except for the reality that others who read these threads and take him seriously, may be seriously misled.

    Ultimately, I'm tired of his anti-gay BS and that of others; so, I'm motivated to just plain act-up about the same. dixon is EASY, because he is obsessed with those few irrelevant points he continues to make.
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 21, 2011
    #97
  23. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, you two have no shortage of your personal "flares". I can back up my views with case law. You have personal opinions based upon emotions and hormones.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 24, 2011
    #98
  24. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    our views are backed up by FEDERAL case law. you simply don't have the mental capacity that a 6th grader does. or you missed that day in 6th grade civics that taught FEDERAL>state
     
    rahl, Oct 24, 2011
    #99
  25. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None that youve shared with us here. You two have been too busy declaring my arguments to be refuted, to have ever gotten around to actually doing so.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 24, 2011
    #100
Page 4 of 5
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page