How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition

Discussion in '9/11' started by Munkle, Sep 12, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    you are entitled to your opinion on this matter.
    however the manner of destruction for WTC1, 2 & 7
    for starters, and of course you see no evidence of controlled demolition.

    The evidence has been presented, its just that some people are resistant to recognizing it.
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Again,it's not my 'opinion'...It's fact,You've presented NO 'evidence'
     
  3. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is of course two sides to this,
    and the faction that refuses to recognize the fact that there is evidence to support the inside job position, simply places itself in an untenable position.

    There is LOTS of evidence pro / con,
    and people need to recognize that fact, and examine as much as they can find, and then in the final analysis the decision is a very personal one, do you get it, or do you not?
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    YOU have presented NO evidence......period.
     
  5. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
  7. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    By that standard, the faction promoting the suicidal hijackers story
    also has zero evidence.

    : )
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nice try Bob,but you know we have airtight evidence
     
  9. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You insist that the "evidence" supporting the hijacked airliners fiasco,
    is "airtight" ..... like the phone calls from the planes?
    like the total destruction of WTC1,2 & 7, What is it that makes your
    case, what makes you actually believe there were even any airliners at all?
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Phone calls came from airphones on the planes and when they were flying low enough,from cell phones

    And I KNOW there were airliners,there was physical evidence to support that fact.
     
  11. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Physical evidence like the "95%" of FLT93 that was allegedly accounted for but there is no documentation for? Like the fact that the "FLT11" & "FLT175" flight data recorders were never found? Like the flight path discrepancies in the alleged FLIGHT DATA for "FLT77"?
    at least one of the airliners used ( or alleged to have been used )
    in this fiasco, is known for certain to have NOT had "airphones" installed, and so no airphone calls were possible from that flight. The whole cell phone calls bit is really reaching, in that for some of the calls, at least according to tracking data on the aircraft, the airliner was above 10,000 ft when the calls were made, simply not possible to engage a cell tower from that altitude.

    Bottom line here, the "news" has fed the public a load of crap
    the Pentagon hit is IMPOSSIBLE to have happened the way
    that the official story tells it.
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    >>>MOD EDIT Off Topic Removed<<<


    Oh by the way ,all four airliners had airfones,and the people who used cell phones had varied amounts of success
     
  13. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BTW: David Ray Griffin addresses the phone calls from the planes issue
    in "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" youtube video part 5, 2:30 into it..... check it out, & yes, I trust his research.
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't...he has books and videos to sell,as well as speaking engagements with the truther faithful...
     
  15. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So what you base your distrust upon, is the fact that he writes books and speaks in public? Have you actually checked any of his work?
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Unbelievable....Of course I've checked it out

    And It's not JUST the fact he writes books and gives speeches,It's the SUBJECT he invariably covers
     
  17. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so, since you have checked it out, have you found any specific
    instance where his findings are inaccurate?
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    claiming 9/11 was an inside job is really all that's needed
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What bit of evidence proves beyond any doubt that
    9/11 was not an inside job?
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The fact that there's no evidence for 'inside job'.
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh yea, little bits like the obvious demolition of WTC1,2 & 7
    the obviously fake airliner hit to the PENTAGON ......
    just little bits like that.....
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All in your imagination
     
  23. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just because some people choose to accept the fairy tale about suicidal hijackers .... ( etc ..... ) doesn't mean everybody should fall for that ridiculous story.
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You haven'y even proven it was a 'ridiculous story' yet,either
     
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and the fan-club of the official story has yet to prove that WTC1,2 & 7
    could have collapsed into total destruction in the manner observed without the use of explosives.

    Why is it that you refuse to even discuss alternatives to the total collapse scenario? There are a multitude of possible outcomes, and total destruction is among the least probable of all.
     

Share This Page