How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition

You can't even get the history of printing correct..

Early newspapers were mostly print,with some cartoons and illustrations,the amount of work needed discouraged papers from doing it a lot

 

"newspapers" came a good bit after the invention of printing
I'm talking about in the beginning when most of the audience for the material
could not read.

 

In the beginning it was just type

 

whatever ..... You don't know about "woodcuts"?

anyhow, back to the subject of 9/11
can you understand that in order to get WTC7 to fall
in the manner that it did, and at the rate of acceleration that it did,
it would be necessary to remove ALL of the support out from under
the bit observed falling, and ALL at the same time.
how is that done without explosives, or somebody ripped off Harry Potter's wand?

 

You don't understand the time involved making woodcuts?

It got easier when they went to offset


NO explosives in WTC 7

 

and you know guaranteed for certain "no explosives"
exactly how?

please enlighten me.........

 

Were any indications of explosions in the debris?...did the workers notice the telltale smells of explosives?

 

Ya know, I can't say for the scene at "ground zero" but I know for a fact
that at least 1 witness at the Pentagon told of smelling explosive, and he was ignored. oops!

anyhow, in all the chaos of NYC at the time, there where a LOT of different smells
floating around because of the mass quantity of pulverized material in the air.

The real smart thing to do, would be to collect up samples of the dust to be examined
later, and do a very careful sample collection with specific location data and the time
of collection for each sample, this was not done.

Look up NFPA 921 ......

 

One witness...oh boy

there was no 'pulverized metal in the air'.and the dust is a bad idea.

 

try re-reading my post .......

 

No need

 

note: I wrote "pulverized material" and you misquoted me as "pulverized metal"

no need ...... really?

 

hmm,my mistake.

 

Strange that every witness that counters the standard boloney being presented, is wrong. Every pro government witness is completely credible. Why is that?

 

because the ones that 'counter' it a few and far between,and usually on the fringe

 

define what constitutes being "on the fringe"

 

Not in touch with reality. Also: out to make a buck or ten from gullible 'truthers'.

 

Please see posts 1 & 2 of this thread, they answer a LOT
of the points that have been brought up lately in that one
question was raised as to the nature of radio controlled
detonators and what was the possibility of a random R.F.
source triggering an explosion when it wasn't supposed to
happen yet.

also please note that in the towers there were most likely
a dozen or more large power transformers, these towers
had to have their own utility sub-stations internally and the
only way to have conversion from the high voltage feed to
the lower voltages used by the offices, is to use a transformer.
these transformers would by their very nature be tons of iron
& copper and the iron would be in a unified core of the transformer,
that is more like a single lump of iron a ton or more and surrounded
by copper windings that would consist of copper flat-bar at least 4 mm thick and 80 mm wide, and with all of that stuff, where is the so much
as a recognizable remnant of a power transformer?

 

How do you know there wasn't?

 

I have searched for pix of remnants of the "collapse"
on the web, and also asked questions about it on forums
and so far, after years of asking, no evidence has as yet
surfaced, what do you have?

 

Power originated from the Con Ed station at the base of WTC7. They supplied power to the power distribution center below the ground level which supplied power to the switchgears and transformers located on 4 different mechanical floors in each tower. Why would you expect there to be a variety of explicit pictures of their remnants/removal? Lack of these photos means absolutely nothing.

Read the PDF at the link below starting in section 2.

http://www.starsandstrikes.com/imag.../PACO Report (8.1.02) 02-19-2007-05-38-29.pdf

 

There was a big deal made of finding even a seriously damaged
file cabinet at ground zero, I would have expected various bits
to have been documented, there are pictures of collections of
fire-arms salvaged from the rubble, however larger objects such
as the stoves, & cookware from the Restaurant at the top of WTC1
conspicuous by its absence. Very strange that......

 

There are pictures of one of the elevator motors on the ground.

Have you seen that?

 

your last sentence is is so full of b.s in the fact that if you had even bothered to read his posts and watch the vidoes which you obviously did not,you would see it does indeed make far more sense than these bs unsubstantiated ramblings that muslims did it because first of all it makes perfect sense that an unknown group of people went into the two towers and bld 7 and wired them up without anyone noticing,they used service elevaters which the employyes had no access to and the employees talked about a lot of very strange unusual activities going on in the prior months before that was unprecedented.

oh and Bushs cousin was the head of the security so only an idiot wouldnt see through that,that the government was easily able to plant those explosives.duh.also the CIA always participates in covert operations involving explosives so that point is irrelevent as well.

oh and it actually only takes only a dozen or so people working in the government to remote control them to do that,never mind that remote controlled aircraft can fly several hours on end around the country and that there are alot of evil people in the world who as long as they are paid money,will keep their mouths shut and will murder thousands,that human lives mean nothing to them,that they will do anything for money cause there are thousands of selfish greedy people in the world and never mind our corrupt government has been exposed for lying to the people so many times before in the past so your point there is mute as well.

its called sophisticated state of the art equipment is why they werent interrupted Einstein.

the BBC is just as bad as the lamestream media is and the CIA operates around the entire globe and they work with them Einstein.you have no logical answer for them reporting it to collapse saying its LIVE on the spot when it hasnt even collapsed yet.

people who are well paid arent going to talk and they dont want to end up getting killed either Einstein. oh and just be patient,40 years from now,dont be surprised if people start coming forward confessing they were involved.E Howard Hunt a CIA operative,denied for decades that he was in dallas on nov 22nd 1963 but on his deathbed confession a few years ago confessed he had lied all these years and decades and was there as part of a CIA operation to kill kennedy.

myself and others brought that up and the JFK section only to watch all the paid shills that troll this section everyday defending the lies of the 9/11 coverup commision ignore it acting like nobody posted it.

considering that half the alleged highjackers turned up alive afterwards just shows how gullible you really are and how idiotic this post is to say the official version makes much more sense.

miserable fail. your so afraid of the the truth,you only see what you want to see which is why you did not bother to read anything he posted.

 

Paid shills on this forum?

You don't think that's ever so slightly paranoid?