How many of you people actually know for every $1 there is $1 of debt?

Come now, you know your points were fabricated in your own mind, but feel free to demonstrate their accuracy

 

Is this the best you can think up after your cretinous "assures: assumption, unproven" error? That's a shame. I was hoping for at least some fight.

 

You're view appears to be defining a dollar in terms of being simply numbers centrally maintained by government. If that's what this thread is trying to say, then if/when government achieves that goal I will agree with the OP. But that has not been accomplished yet.

 

It's not just government debt that creates dollars and the FED is not part of the government

 

When you use the word 'dollars', I take it you are NOT referring to the currency we can hold in our hand. Is that correct?

 

Most dollars are electronic credits in a computer

 

Imperial credits.

 

Have you tried to convert your bank account to $100's lately? You'll get the imperial treatment alright

 

We are all victims of “the war on cash”.

 

Central control of currency is the fifth plank of Marx's manefesto

 

Of course. Makes perfect sense.

 

Government hates money, but loves currency that it can produce at will.

 

Government hates anything that they can’t control completely.

 

Ooo, you've been reading right wing tosh sites haven't you? Marx wasn't at all fussed with the 10 principles: "The practical application of the principles will depend, as the Manifesto itself states, everywhere and at all times, on the historical conditions for the time being existing, and, for that reason, no special stress is laid on the revolutionary measures proposed at the end of Section II. That passage would, in many respects, be very differently worded today"

 

I agree that it is better for the government to eliminate interventions in the monetary system.

 

Friedman wouldn't agree!

 

And why would I give an eff about what Friedman would agree with?

 

An example of a right winger that, whilst error stricken, doesn't agree with you. Do you have a right winger example that does?

 

Not an answer. Why would I give an eff about what Friedman thinks?

 

Don't dodge now! I deliberately chose a right winger who would tut at your opinion. Now try and answer my simple question. Can you refer to a right winger who would agree with you?

 

To directly answer your question: No I can’t refer to a right winger who would agree with me.

But I agree that it’s better for government to eliminate interventions in the monetary system.

 

like giving large finance banks $1.3T for 4 years running while exchanging it for failed assets on the books of the banks ? That kind of intervention ?

 

Yes. Those sort of interventions should be eliminated.

 

ooh, you make your living by the forced use of the system.

 

Not ten congressmen combined would be willing to do anything about it.