If Trump burned everybody alive who didn't vote for him, would you then condemn him?

Mohammad approved of circumcision. Not all circumcision is FGM.

Why do you think FGM is concentrated almost totally in Africa north of the Congo?

 

So you would rather humans be robots who are incapable of doing anything that the Christian god perceives is "evil"?

 

I've never seen anyone care as LITTLE for little girls as you do.

 

He's smart, he can give us free will but also, to some degree, not free will in every thing.....or is he not "all-powerful"?

You are defending a religion that burns people alive if they convert to, say, Buddhism. You are defending evil. Take a good look in the mirror and ask yourself why you DEFEND evil.

 

Free will isn't really a "degrees" thing. You either have it or you don't.

 

Where the **** do you get that out of my post? I'm rightfully pointing out that FGM is almost entirely an African tribal practice that occurs across religions.

 

Mohammad approved of FGM.....FGM. Can you condemn Muslims for thinking that the best man off all time is one who approved of FGM? I do.

 

It would have been better if Mohammad said "I oppose FGM", instead of approving of it, of course - that way fewer (I didn't say "all") little girls would have been hurt/damaged in such a barbaric way. Can we at least agree on that?

 

It was still a tribal belief. FGM and support of it are not required to be Muslim.

 

Why do you insist on holding people who never lived in modern day America to the moral standards of modern day America?

If you are determined to be "evil" by the standards of 28th Century Mars, would it be fair for you to be condemned by 28th Century Martian standards? Standards that you have never even heard of and know nothing about?

 

Not even Dawkin's can say that.

 

Can the constitution be amended by removing what is already there? Or does it only allow additions? If removal is allowed, then I don't understand why that is still in there. However, does it really matter if it is not applied today?

 

cant remove, but can amend so as to annul.

the 2nd amendment can be annuled by a new amendment.

 

You can't be as devoid of rational perception as you sound. But then, most who hawk the liberal/socialist and now democratic propaganda are in deep denial too, and work hard to prove that pigs really do fly in libby land.

Obama will go down in history as the first black president- other than that, he will be as memorable as jimmy Carter except that he made a lot more mistakes.
Now I voted for the guy- and I'm really ashamed for being taken in by a smooth talking, charming personality that couldn't really drive the bus at all.
I was wrong, and I admit it. Some people have such a resistance to accepting they are wrong that they defend a bad decision indefinitely in the face of clear evidence.

 

So why isn't it if it is essentially racist! This is the first time that I'm questioning the constitution of the USA.

 

Oh, when was Moore found guilty?

You think Obama's deportation policy was too harsh? Are you actually for zero deportation?

Since when was Russia a sworn enemy of the USA? And when did Trump praise Kim Jong Un? The two of them are Twitter's most famous feuding couple.

 

I say you views on God, heaven and hell are too superficial. But you are moving in theright direction, I think.
Perhaps you should become a Buddhist or something, it will suit you well philosophicaly.

 

Creating full time jobs is not as easy as part time. The vast majority of the jobs created under Obama were part time. Take my sister for example. For years she worked in a lawyers office, then the ObamaCare employer mandate hits and she has her hours cut in half. She now works 3 part time jobs. To you, that would mean Obama created two new jobs. As for his other "accomplishments"

 

It’s overwritten by the 13th and 14th Amendments, but the clause remains in that section.

 

>
If Trump burned everybody alive who didn't vote for him, would you then condemn him?


Why would they? They haven't condemn him for anything he's done, not even lusting after his own daughter nor war mongering any other gross , nasty thing he's done.

They approve .

 

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be "wrong" about, because you didn't bother to state it or quote me "being wrong". But thanks for trying anyway....

 

"Found guilty"? I'm not going to waste my time explaining how statutes of limitations work. Look it up.

No.

"Sworn enemy"? I have no idea who you are responding to.

 

Neither part time nor full time are easy to create. As a matter of fact, I'm using the "expression" used by the person I'm responding to Strictly speaking, what Obama did was create the conditions that allowed for the creation of jobs. He did that by enacting legislation, which is the only way to do it in a sustainable way. Trump has enacted zero legislation that would have had that effect.

 

Are you saying that it is a problem?

 

What the hell does this have to do with statutes of limitations? Are you suggesting that if the statutes of limitations didn't exist, then he would've been taken to trail and found guilty by now? You called the man a pedophile and I'm curious how you know that he is. If someone accused you of being a pedophile, are you a pedophile too?

Okay, but you think Obama's deportation policy was too harsh?

You referred to Putin as a "foe", did you not? And when did Trump praise Kim Jong Un?