If you don't want a baby, get your tubes tied.

Giving up a baby for adoption is not only emotionally wrenching for the woman, but the child is likely to have psychological issues. Adoption is not a panacea, and because it hasn't always been adequately regulated, there have been many cases such as these:

Adoptive Parents Arrested After Abusing, Starving 2 Girls: Arizona Police

A Peoria couple faces felony child abuse charges after two of their adoptive daughters outlined a pattern of ongoing
physical and psychological abuse at the hands of their parents that began five years ago as an attempt, the mother
said, to “train” the girls to be “loving and nurturing.”
http://ktla.com/2014/06/08/adoptive-parents-arrested-after-abusing-starving-2-girls-arizona-police/

Las Vegas police: Former foster parents arrested on child abuse, neglect charges

Two former foster parents were arrested on charges of abuse and neglect of three children whom they later adopted,
according to Las Vegas police reports released Thursday. Janet Solander, 53, and Dwight Solander, 50, face multiple felony charges that include child abuse, neglect or endangerment. The mother also is charged with sexual assault of a minor. Also facing charges is Janet Solander’s biological daughter, Danielle Hinton, 21.

Police arrest adoptive parents of child found chained up
http://wreg.com/2014/07/09/police-arrest-adoptive-parents-of-child-found-chained-up/

Extensive list of adoptive parental abuse cases:
http://poundpuplegacy.org/node/20817

 

That's right, better to kill them in the womb. Before they ever have a chance to live an unhappy life.

 

YUP! But it sounds like you enjoy the idea of children having an "unhappy" life.....


Why do you keep asking the same question over and over again? The answer doesn't change....can't you comprehend written words?


Adoption isn't terrible...everybody who is against abortion should adopt a kid including YOU.

However, it is very terrible for the woman giving up her child for adoption.

She has to go through nine months of pregnancy, suffer pain, discomfort, and permanent physical damage, possible serious illness or death, monetary loss, possible job loss, time off work, interrupted education or career....all to go through giving the kid to someone else!?!?

That's just Stupid with a capital S.

 

It IS all about the woman. Women are the ones who get pregnant.


Women are not like pet animals, you know, that they should be forced to breed.

 

That's up to each individual person. It's not up to you to make decisions for other people. Sorry but you don't have that right. You don't rule over another person's body, peace of mind, etc.

 

That's the problem with Anti-Choicers, the psychotic "Busybody, I Rule the World " syndrome...........they don't really care about the fetus, just getting their way, like spoiled children who think the world was created just for them.

 

in order for the anti-lifers to justify murder, they give license to call it something other than human/baby. That way they can sleep with themselves after they murder that evil growth inside of them.......it ain't murder when you can call it anything but a baby. You know, that "cop" mentality...where "I thought it was armed" usually ends up with another dead something other than human

- - - Updated - - -

who speaks for the baby? Most certainly not some in here...they are more worried about "it's all about me"

 

Prolifers need to call it a "baby" (medically, it isn't until birth) to justify controlling women's lives.

Do you speak for the baby when Republicans try to take away its healthcare insurance and food stamps? Do you speak for the baby when corporations pollute the air and water, and ignore safety regulations? What about the children whose parents are denied a decent working wage?

 

as far as jobs go, talk to your hero. He's the one that has finished the job trashing the economy. Why the hell should I pay for deadbeats? Social obligation? bull(*)(*)(*)(*)!...... that idiot is more concerned with being a golfing rockstar than being a leader.
things things you lay on the rest of America have their very roots in Socialism. So far it's failing and failing faster the Liberals want to think about.
It is the parent's responsibility to take care of their families, not the government.
So you absolutely favor the Nanny State. Why care for yourself when you can force your neighbor to take care of the retarded Libs while they insult and slur them, eh?
Who's going to pay for the 50% who don't work? and how long will that last? take note that only 30% of the population is currently employed in any instance today. (I believe it is less than the 30% I stated)

 

Post limit thread closure notification

Shangrila
Moderator