So is your claim you want to save children when what you really mean is you want to do something that is convent for you and puts you in no personal danger. Keyboard cowboys. Whatever, dude.
OMGAWD! JUST OMGAWD! Where do conservatives complain? With every thread on abortion, on Welfare, the poor, taxes....head in the sand syndrome doesn't negate a long history of Repub/conservatives trying to defund or cut funding to programs that aid children especially poor children. Trump supporters applaud Trump putting immigrant children in cages ...
FoxHastings said: ↑ OMGAWD! JUST OMGAWD! Where do conservatives complain? With every thread on abortion, on Welfare, the poor, taxes....head in the sand syndrome doesn't negate a long history of Repub/conservatives trying to defund or cut funding to programs that aid children especially poor children. Trump supporters applaud Trump putting immigrant children in cages ... I had plenty, I explained you. But, once again as usual YOU couldn't refute one word of my post ...you make it so obvious ! LOL!
One can lead a horse to water but... Even with all the proof I've provided you, you still won't understand.
So you do you think about the millions of Germans who were complicit in the holocaust were just fake Christians when they went to church? Wonder why they weren’t put in concentration camps? If you have to ask me who is putting children in cages separating them from their parents then you’re worse than I thought. There’s that extremism again projecting onto me how you would probably grade someone who said that abortion should be allowed. I don’t give a F’s to students who don’t agree with me but as I said abortion is not discussed.
Yes. Who is putting children in cages ?? Let's see some pictures of these cages that children are put into. I'd suggest that you stay out of the CNN/MSNBC cesspool. If one of your students said the human life begins at conception how would you react ??
Back in 2013, Democrats, who at the time controlled the Senate, were so frustrated by the slow pace of confirmation of then-President Obama's nominees that they pulled the trigger on what was known as the "nuclear option." This essentially changed the rules in the Senate and busted the 60-vote threshold down to a simple majority of 51 votes for presidential nominees only. Fast-forward to 2017, when Republicans chipped a little more away from the 60-vote requirement when they said that Supreme Court nominees would also only need 51 votes to be confirmed.
I assumed a certain level of understanding that the discussion was about legislation. I was obviously very wrong.
I certainly saw nothing pertinent to your claim....perhaps you can explain your reasoning so everyone here understands what you meant.
Considering I am the one who posted about it (not by that name) I would say I have an understanding...your attempt to change the subject to make embarrassment less did not work however and rather than get warned for calling you out again I will now walk away. Buh Bye
