Incest & Planned Parenthood

It’s against the law to fund abortions with tax dollars, yet that has not stopped Democrats:

And this:

Will Planned Parenthood finally be stopped? Not if it follows in ACORN’s footsteps. It’s easier to turn lead into gold than it is to defund any part of socialism’s culture of death.

Planned Parenthood wrapped itself in plausible deniability by camouflaging their abortion mills as health clinics for women. Look for Planned Parenthood and it’s defenders to change tact on this one:

Calls for Planned Parenthood oversight hearings get louder
by Audrey Hudson
Posted 03/05/2012 ET
Updated 03/05/2012 ET

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=49956

Denise Fairbanks adds a new dimension to the funding issue. I’m certain the infanticide crowd will try to get some milage out of incest. I can only pray that the members of the committee understand that legal, tax dollar funded, abortions encourage incest. First, legal abortion removes the fear of pregnancy, then removing the burden of paying for an abortion by accessing tax dollars makes it easier for incestuous individuals at the lower end of the economic ladder to abuse children who are close relations. It is those children who need the most protection, but get the least from Democrats —— male and female. No elected Democrat will offend a major constituency just to protect children.

Finally, I don’t know how much of the aforementioned $5.8 billion PP received —— after funding abortions with tax dollars was declared illegal, but if I was on that committee the minute a Planned Parenthood sharpshooter started to testify I would interrupt with this one:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bciFny5ysrQ&feature=player_embedded"]HANK SNOW - "THE GOLD RUSH IS OVER" - YouTube[/ame]

 

I imagine there is a reason why they didn't report the abuse.

 

Let's hope the girl gets over her abuse. And if the dad was there, in other words the person who raped her, why would the girl tell PP?

 

Excellent question, and one the lifers will likely dodge.

 

Let's find out. Taking a good guess as to yes though.

 

To Makedde: There is always a reason. When it comes from hustlers like Planned Parenthood the reason offered seldom has anything to do with the truth.

To Kranes56 & Makedde: You’re coming mighty close to blaming the victim in order to shield Planned Parenthood.

 

You do know her case was dismissed, right?

 

To Cady: I’m not certain if the case was dismissed, settled, or is in progress? The following excerpt from the article I linked in the OP indicates the case is ongoing. No matter. The congressional hearing is the important part of the story. I hasten to add “It’s about time.”

 

This is just the tip of the iceberg…..over the years PP has been in the spot light many times for hiding underaged girls abortion for whatever reason.

They will do anything under the sun to promote their agenda.

 

To churchmouse: And keep the tax dollars rolling in. Making everyone pay for infanticide is the agenda.

 

Because they don't want to loose the repeat business.

 

Oh, well, that settles it. Nothing to see here!

 

To Cady & Makedde: Nice bit of misdirection moving the thread away from Planned Parenthood and onto the status if Denise Fairbanks’ lawsuit. Okay, if that’s the way you want to go let’s try this! Get all of those top Democrat women to make videos of them engaging in sex with animals, with multiple partners, masturbating, homosexual acts, and every other foul thing they advocate for children. Admittedly, they are old hags; nevertheless, run the videos on the Internet to show they practice what they preach.

The article in part two goes back ten years, but it captures the essence of the things Democrat women stand for:

Planned Parenthood now Sex, Inc.?
Pro-lifers say abortion business shows children to how-to's
Published: 9 hours ago
By Dave Tombers

American Life League, one of the nation’s largest grassroots pro-life organizations, says Planned Parenthood really isn’t in the health business these days, it’s in the sex business.

The organization says the abortion industry giant’s “business model” essentially “is aimed at making money from people who are engaged in sexual activity.” Celebrities such as Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., repeatedly have stumped for more federal tax money for Planned Parenthood.

ALL has produced a video, part of the American Life League Report, that documents Planned Parenthood’s promotion of sex toys, sex contests, sex balloons, sex cupcakes, sex fruit rollups and sex costumes.

The video has been posted in an adult section on YouTube and, while informational for parents and adults, is explicit and should not be accessed by children.

ALL’s opening statement in its report is, “Do not let children watch this episode of the American Life League Report.”

In addition to showing viewers the indoctrination Planned Parenthood is delivering to younger and younger audiences, the report also brings to light internal Planned Parenthood memos dating before the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that show strategies on how to reduce the American population through methods such as “forced abortion” and “fertility control agents” dispersed in the nations water supply.

The video, called “Hooking Kids on Sex,” exposes Planned Parenthood’s decades-long endeavor to push sex on youngsters, much like a drug dealer hooks potential customers on narcotics.

Paul Rondeau, executive director of American Life League, told WND that the “Hooking Kids on Sex” report shows how Planned Parenthood uses tax money to push disturbing sexual behavior on kids, “because it drives future business for them.”

“Those [young girls] are the women who will have abortions,” the organization explains.

It also claims that 51 percent of Planned Parenthood’ 2010 income came from abortions.

Rondeau said the video gathered 200,000-plus views in just four days.

“Any parent that sees the video of Planned Parenthood’s material for school children will be horrified,” ALL said.

The ALL report documents Planned Parenthood videos, websites and curriculum aimed at children as young as 10, including those that encourage kids to have sex and feature cartoon depictions on how to do it.

“Remember when activists alleged that just the fact that Joe Camel was a cartoon character implied kids should smoke, so he was banned?” asked Rondeau.

“Even people who thought they knew better were shocked by how Planned Parenthood promotes sex to youngsters,” he said

The report begins with images of sex toys and graphics that the host identifies as being pushed by Planned Parenthood’s “community activities.” The narrator then declares, “But what’s truly shocking, is how these perverts are allowed unfettered access to our children while raking in government cash to sell them unrestrained sex.”

The “why” isn’t complicated, the report says.

“Just as the goal of a drug dealer is to make drug addicts, Planned Parenthood’s goal is to make sex addicts.”

The host then wonders if Planned Parenthood is looking for future abortion and contraceptive customers.

Among the campaigns attributed to Planned Parenthood is a book pushed on a website for young readers titled “It’s Perfectly Normal,” which contains cartoon depictions of naked boys and girls, images of masturbation and cartoons of people engaged in sex.

“If a dirty old man showed this book to kids in a park, he’d be arrested,” said the host. “Why does Planned Parenthood, a taxpayer-funded organization, get to distribute these books to our children and get more government money?”

A statement on Planned Parenthood’s teen website, for example, encourages kids to seek arousal through breasts: “They are basically ‘freebies,’ since you can’t get pregnant or catch sexually transmitted infection by going to ‘second base,’” the statement said.

Other body parts are described in great detail on the website, including many declarations about “pleasure” and “feeling good,” as well as detailed instructions on engaging in homosexual acts.

The ALL report also portrays a memo apparently written in 1969 by then-Vice President of Planned Parenthood-World Population Frederick S. Jaffe. It was to Bernard Berelson of the population council, which highlighted proposed endeavors to reduce U. S. fertility through organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the U. S. government.

“As shown in this memo from 1969, Planned Parenthood’s national goal is to restructure the family and encourage increased homosexuality as a sick form of population control,” explains the video.

The memo contains a table under the heading “Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U. S. Fertility” that contains subheadings such as “Restructure Family,” followed by means to achieve the goal, such as “Postpone or avoid marriage” and “Alter image of ideal family size.”

The memo then suggests other ways to help achieve a “restructured family” such as “Compulsory education of children,” “Encourage increased homosexuality,” “Educate for family limitation,” “Fertility control agents in water supply” and “Encourage women to work.”

Then the 1969 Planned Parenthood memo suggests even more radical measures such as “Discouraging private home ownership,” “Additional taxes on parents with 1 or 2 children in school,” “Compulsory abortions for out-of-wedlock pregnancies” and “Require women to work and provide few child care facilities.”

ALL told WND that the report not only shows parents the disturbing methods Planned Parenthood uses to reach America’s young children, such as through cartoons and games, but also through the hosting of “no-pants” sex parties.

According to ALL, the video report had to be replaced by nearly the same video this week after a former Planned Parenthood intern and abortion escort apparently complained to Youtube about a copyright violation.

Youtube replaced the “white hot” video with this message, “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Jessica Faerman.”

ALL maintains that there were no copyright issues with the video but has modified it slightly and re-posted it as “Hooking Kids on Sex II.”

It also has been made available online at other sites, including all.org, to ensure no further disruptions to the message.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/planned-parenthood-now-sex-inc/?cat_orig=us

 

PART TWO:

Child sex book given out at U.N. summit
Washington Times 05/10/02: George Archibald

A UNICEF-funded book being passed out at the United Nations Child Summit encourages children to engage in sexual activities with other minors and with homosexuals and animals.

As the delegations to the summit remain deadlocked on abortion, international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that support the U.S. delegation's anti-abortion stance circulated copies of pages from a UNICEF-funded book given to delegates from Latin America that promotes sexual activity and abortion among teens in their countries.

"Reproductive health includes the following components: Counseling on sexuality, pregnancy, methods of contraception, abortion, infertility, infections and diseases," says the Spanish-language book, whose title translates to "Theoretic Elements for Working with Mothers and Pregnant Teens."

An accompanying workshop book produced by the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) tells Latin American mothers and teens: "Situations in which you can obtain sexual pleasure: 1. Masturbation. 2. Sexual relations with a partner ? whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. 3. A sexual response that is directed toward inanimate objects, animals, minors, non-consenting persons."

The book, which was distributed by the Mexican government with U.N. funding, suggests lesbian sex as an acceptable alternative for girls.

"Sexual relations with a partner: Here we should insist there is no ideal or perfect relations between two or several people," the book says. "The one that gives us the most satisfaction and that which is adopted to our way of being and the style of life we have chosen. This is why we encounter many differences among women. Some women like to have relations with men. And others with another woman."

UNICEF spokesman Alfred Ironside acknowledged U.N. funding for the book, but said it was produced by the Mexican government in 1999 and pulled from circulation "when the content was more carefully reviewed."

Mr. Ironside said he did not know how many of the books were circulated. "A very small number were produced fewer than a thousand," he said. "It was pulled out of circulation when the content was more carefully
reviewed."

"That book was a product of the Mexican government, supported by UNICEF financially as part of UNICEF's support to the Mexican government," Mr. Ironside said.

"We do everything we do in full agreement with the governments we support. We do not operate independently," he said.

He said the book was "intended as a training manual for people working with adolescent women to prevent teen pregnancy. That publication was a compilation of articles by different contributors and has a very clear disclaimer in the front that the views of the writers do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations."

The workshop book is being passed out by anti-abortion NGOs to persuade delegates from the large Latin American bloc of countries called the Rio Group to support the U.S. proposal to remove ambiguous language from the child-summit action document, which has been used in the past by U.N. agencies to promote abortion.

Delegations to the U.N. Child Summit remained deadlocked yesterday in closed-door negotiations over abortion and other hot-button issues that have held up final agreement on a U.N. action agenda to protect the world's children.

The U.S. delegation, praised by pro-family groups for standing firm to ensure the agenda does not sanction continued U.N. promotion of abortions, was attacked by NGO critics for a second day at an afternoon briefing, NGO members at the meeting said.

Douglas Sylva, an official with the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, called the briefing "an NGO feeding frenzy," in which the United States was attacked for its position on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict; arms sales to allies; the Bush administration's support of capital punishment; and U.S. failure to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child.

"The fact that the United States is the only country besides Somalia that has not ratified [the] child's rights [convention] is shocking," said Paula Daeppen, director in Zurich for the Federation of American Women's Clubs Overseas.

"We're supposed to be a moral leader of the world and child friendly," she said.

Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, Texas Democrat, told the meeting she applauded the administration's work to protect children from pornography, exploitation and "child soldiering." But she said she disagreed with the U.S. delegation on some issues.

"There needs to be flexibility on life," she said ? an apparent reference to the administration's strong anti-abortion stance. A person close to the congresswoman, who asked to remain anonymous, said her remarks were intended to urge "more flexibility on family planning."

Abortion is not mentioned directly in the draft child-summit document, but UNICEF, which organized the 187-country special session of the General Assembly, and the U.N. Fund for Population Activities, interpret the ambiguous phrase "reproductive health services" to include abortion.

A senior Canadian negotiator told delegates in earlier preparatory meetings that the term includes abortion, prompting the Bush administration to start pushing for the alternate term "reproductive health care."

European countries, with the exception of Spain, along with Canada, Japan and New Zealand oppose the U.S. position. Muslim nations and some African countries also support the United States.

The Rio Group, whose delegations say their predominantly Catholic populations don't condone abortion, said there is no danger the term "reproductive health services" will be used to promote abortions in Latin America.


http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/ArchibaldUnicef.php

http://www.prisonplanet.com/child_sex_book_given_out_at_un_summit.html