Is Fauci the Patron Saint of health or the Antichrist of a worldwide plague?

Discussion in 'Coronavirus Pandemic Discussions' started by Ray9, May 10, 2021.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
  2. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Burp…..I’m sure your last bogus post can attest to your lack of reliability.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
  3. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,888
    Likes Received:
    5,145
    Trophy Points:
    113
  4. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you really knew you would have listed a reference. The false statement was that the courts never ruled on it. They did. Get with the program.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
  5. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You lead the pack.
     
  6. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As yet, you still can’t tell us who these asymptomatic people are.
     
  7. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,888
    Likes Received:
    5,145
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In your link the last ruling was SCOTUS allowed it to stay in effect till SCOTUS heard the case. How did that turn out?

    Getting Federal courts to rule to block Trump was no step for a stepper but this didn't stay blocked. Did it?
     
  8. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A fraudulent post by you. I maintained the courts ruled on them as being unconstitutional. Trump pulled a lot of unconstitutional sht. You’re wrong again.
     
  9. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Makes sense, if you’re a farmer and try to compare cows and sheep to human beings. In the real world, humans go to schools, the vast majority until recently wear unvaccinated. . I guess in your world every is put into a pen, caged or corralled. Last I looked, normal behavioral humans weren’t
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
  10. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still trying to bring up strawman arguments I see. Read the original two posts again.
     
  11. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    18,415
    Likes Received:
    10,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody can. Even our best testing can’t identify them.

    But I can identify a small demographic of who they aren’t.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
  12. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong.you’re not reading anything but the farmer’s journal
     
  13. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    18,415
    Likes Received:
    10,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Our best tests can’t identify asymptomatic infections consistently and reliable. That’s a fact.

    I appreciate the ad hominem. It all to my advantage.
     
  14. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obviously, they can. You have provided no evidence, just accusations. Obviously you rely on observed symptoms which is hilariously more inconclusive then any other method.

    why not just use hair color ? Btw, just calling something a fact when it isn’t, isn't working.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
  15. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,888
    Likes Received:
    5,145
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The ruling was never finalized, to claim it was is a fraudulent claim. SCOTUS let the bans stand till the case could be heard. Do you have a link to the final ruling on it?
     
  16. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    18,415
    Likes Received:
    10,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I always have evidence. I’ve posted the evidence many times on PF. Here it is again just for you. From the Farmer’s Journal. Oh, wait, no, it’s the Annals of Internal Medicine. LOL

    https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-1495
    The results are similar for completely asymptomatic demographics.

    I only post facts, Dagosa. I’m here to help people. Lying doesn’t help people. You are getting enough lies from your sources. I won’t mislead you.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
  17. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,888
    Likes Received:
    5,145
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What for?
     
  18. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    18,415
    Likes Received:
    10,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here’s more from the FDA if you prefer their assessment to independent peer reviewed data.

    https://www.fda.gov/media/136149/download
     
  19. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Banned

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    14,038
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're not a very smart guy. That's too bad.
     
  20. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Banned

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    14,038
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The courts did not rule on Trump's COVID travel bans or travel restrictions.

    The evidence you just posted had nothing to do with COVID travel bans or restrictions. But it's nice to watch you prove that you have no idea what you're talking about. You just made yourself dumb with no help from me.
     
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2021
  21. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Banned

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    14,038
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There was no ruling about the Travel bans Trump imposed in response to the virus. So, there was no outcome.

    This dagosa character is using an unrelated case to argue his position.
     
  22. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Banned

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    14,038
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's funny to watch someone actually post information which proves they are wrong but still insist that they are right.

    Lol.
     
  23. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,888
    Likes Received:
    5,145
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whatever he's using isn't working for him.
     
  24. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, you’re completely wrong on this post.
     
  25. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,553
    Likes Received:
    6,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You guys are wrong…by your own admission there have been TWO RULINGS,
    Tahuyaman
    “There was no ruling about the Travel bans Trump imposed in response to the virus. So, there was no outcome.”
     
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2021

Share This Page