Is Fauci the Patron Saint of health or the Antichrist of a worldwide plague?

You live in a dream world. Now tell us how everyone else in the world is wrong and you’re right.
https://apnews.com/article/d8da9ab23f6d410e807805c42d972f8c

 

Burp…..I’m sure your last bogus post can attest to your lack of reliability.

 

What was the final outcome?

 

If you really knew you would have listed a reference. The false statement was that the courts never ruled on it. They did. Get with the program.

 

You lead the pack.

 

As yet, you still can’t tell us who these asymptomatic people are.

 

In your link the last ruling was SCOTUS allowed it to stay in effect till SCOTUS heard the case. How did that turn out?

Getting Federal courts to rule to block Trump was no step for a stepper but this didn't stay blocked. Did it?

 

A fraudulent post by you. I maintained the courts ruled on them as being unconstitutional. Trump pulled a lot of unconstitutional sht. You’re wrong again.

 

Makes sense, if you’re a farmer and try to compare cows and sheep to human beings. In the real world, humans go to schools, the vast majority until recently wear unvaccinated. . I guess in your world every is put into a pen, caged or corralled. Last I looked, normal behavioral humans weren’t

 

Still trying to bring up strawman arguments I see. Read the original two posts again.

 

Nobody can. Even our best testing can’t identify them.

But I can identify a small demographic of who they aren’t.

 

Wrong.you’re not reading anything but the farmer’s journal

 

Our best tests can’t identify asymptomatic infections consistently and reliable. That’s a fact.

I appreciate the ad hominem. It all to my advantage.

 

Obviously, they can. You have provided no evidence, just accusations. Obviously you rely on observed symptoms which is hilariously more inconclusive then any other method.

why not just use hair color ? Btw, just calling something a fact when it isn’t, isn't working.

 

The ruling was never finalized, to claim it was is a fraudulent claim. SCOTUS let the bans stand till the case could be heard. Do you have a link to the final ruling on it?

 

I always have evidence. I’ve posted the evidence many times on PF. Here it is again just for you. From the Farmer’s Journal. Oh, wait, no, it’s the Annals of Internal Medicine. LOL

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-1495

The results are similar for completely asymptomatic demographics.

I only post facts, Dagosa. I’m here to help people. Lying doesn’t help people. You are getting enough lies from your sources. I won’t mislead you.

 

What for?

 

Here’s more from the FDA if you prefer their assessment to independent peer reviewed data.

https://www.fda.gov/media/136149/download

 

You're not a very smart guy. That's too bad.

 

The courts did not rule on Trump's COVID travel bans or travel restrictions.

The evidence you just posted had nothing to do with COVID travel bans or restrictions. But it's nice to watch you prove that you have no idea what you're talking about. You just made yourself dumb with no help from me.

 

There was no ruling about the Travel bans Trump imposed in response to the virus. So, there was no outcome.

This dagosa character is using an unrelated case to argue his position.

 

It's funny to watch someone actually post information which proves they are wrong but still insist that they are right.

Lol.

 

Whatever he's using isn't working for him.

 

Well, you’re completely wrong on this post.

 

You guys are wrong…by your own admission there have been TWO RULINGS,
Tahuyaman
“There was no ruling about the Travel bans Trump imposed in response to the virus. So, there was no outcome.”