Is Roe v. Wade at Risk???

FoxHastings said: ↑
Why should she do what YOU want?



I did NOT ask that. I asked "Why should she do what YOU want?"





I did NOT ask that. I asked "Why should she do what YOU want?"

NOT why would she shouldn't seek your counsel but that IS A GOOD WAY TO DUCK answering the question


LOL, you just can't admit that she doesn't have to do what you say......and what if you counseled her to have an abortion??? Should she have to do that because she was "counseled" to do that???

Why do you continue to purposely "misread" what I asked?

Because you know you have no point?

I asked "Why should she do what YOU want?"

NOT why would she shouldn't seek your counsel but that IS A GOOD WAY TO DUCK answering the question

 

No, they are not.

 

Do you really think the slaves were freed because of MORALS ??!!!


.

LOL...try economics and politics.

Some USED "moral arguments" but some people use any means to get what they want..

 

You have to ask why siblings would seek each others counsel? What do you think family is about? Why shouldn't she seek my counsel?

 

As it so happens, morals and economics are related. Are they not?

Yes, there were people in Congress arguing for the freedom of slaves because it was the right thing to do.

 

You proved the point, society decided slavery was NOT moral and outlawed it.

 

I give you a 9 out of 10 for style adaptation and use of bold. We just need to work on your annoyingly correct use of the quote feature, and you'll be a perfect 10!

 

Of course you missed the point!

Laws aren't based on morals because morals CHANGE and vary from person to person and from time to time.

Do you really think the slaves were freed because of MORALS !!!

LOL..... DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH many people thought slavery WAS "moral"... SOME STILL do....but it won't be legal because of legal RIGHTS NOT "morals".

 

Laws change with morals, lol. There's a correlation. And laws are a subset of morals. How can you possibly not understand that.

 

You proved it thank you very much. When we as a society believe an immoral act is so immoral as to be banned under law we pass laws to do so.

 

Nothing complicated about it is there.

 

No. But there are posters on this board that dig down deep to prove an incorrect point. And when they discover it's wrong, they just repeat themselves and dig faster.

 

Yes responding in kind with the formatting

 

What should they be based on then?

 

Exactly!

 

Yep, it's confirmed - THAT'S A RAP! It sure has been a fun couple of months destroying you all! Until next time! If there even IS a next time!

 

My goodness! The silence is DEAFENING!

 

Can she deal with what is in her body on her own?

 

Seems you don't know what autonomy means, which is...freedom from external control or influence. In other words not being controlled by govt when it comes to making the CHOICE to have an abortion.

 

Abortion inside the health system IS the government! So you want to get the government out of abortion? Okay, let's do it!

 

We have private insurance in the US. So no, it's not the govt

 

You don't seem to be familiar with 'Departments of Health.'

 

What does that have to do with private health insurance?

 

Women ALWAYS have a choice. The just don't have the right to someone else's labour.

 

Are you saying that the private health sector doesn't have government health sitting above them?