You mean that you are a good trol instead of a bad one... Nah... silly troll is a silly troll independant of whose eyes gaze on him.
Mahamaddim and Mohammad are not the same two words it's not (*)(*)(*)(*)ing rocket science, Mahamaddim is not even a proper noun, it's a common noun which means that it can not be a name of anyone, it means delightful, and everyone here is now dumber for having listened to your nonsense, I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul.
They are two different words, and Mahamaddim is not even a proper noun IE it's not someones name, it is a common noun which means desire.
Response: Yet your inability to provide any evidence of such a ridiculous claim proves otherwise. Thus all you've demonstrated is a consistency to be delusional, as you repeat the same fallacies, but never attempt to provide any source to back it up. Stop embarrassing yourself.
Response: Then according to your logic, the verse would mean "He is desirables", which is not even a coherent sentence. Debunked as usual.
There is nothing to quote from the link, as I said before,it was to show you what a 'majestic plural' was and how it applies... But I will break it down for you... There is simply no sense in making any ONE'S name in the Bible plural to denote respect. E.G. The very first man in the Bible 'Adam' is not Adamim (hāāḏām) Abraham is not Abrahamim Isaac is not Isaacim Moses is not Mosesim King David is not Davidim etc... you get the picture ? In fact, the only place that you are claiming this should be the case is with 'machmadim' and that would make absolutely no sense i.e "His mouth is most sweet; yea, he is altogether Muhammeds". lol Try a little bit of research from actual Hebrew Scholars.
You are completely wrong, except the warning of the Holy Bible about Islam!And we know the "Fruits" of Isalm. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ Matthew 7:15-20 King James Version (KJV) 15Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Response: We se you once again claim that the plural of respect is not included in mahamadim....with absolutely no quote as proof from any source stating so. Thus your own weak evidence supports the fact that Muhammad's name is mentioned in the bible.
Response: To the contrary, the bible states Muhammad is a true prophet: "Beloved, believe no every Spirit, but try the Spirirts whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into he world" "Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every Spirit that Confesseth that Jesus Christ has come in the Flesh is of God" (1 john 4:1-2) Here we see that a true prophet is one that says that Jesus has come in the flesh. Thus your own bible states that Muhammad is a true prophet because he confesses that that Jesus has come in the Qur'an: "When the Angels said "O Mary, Allah gives thee glad tidings of a son through a word from Him, His name shal be the Messiah, Son of Mary, honoured in this world and in the next, and of those who are granted nearnes to God" Thus your own bible actually confirms that Muhammad is a true prophet.
